Tallcree First Nation v Rath & Company,
| Court | Court of Appeal (Alberta) |
| Judge | Feehan,Slatter,Wakeling |
| Citation | 2022 ABCA 174 |
| Docket Number | 2003-0179AC; 2103-0093AC |
| Date | 11 May 2022 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
2 practice notes
-
Stanchfield v Doe,
...that would include an assessment of reasonableness of the contingency fee agreement: Tallcree First Nation v Rath & Company, 2022 ABCA 174 at para 57; Morrison v Rod Pantony Professional Corp, 2008 ABCA 145 at para 9 Mr. Denis relies on his Contingency Agreement, which is dated April 21......
-
Mikisew Cree First Nation v Rath,
...result, and the risks taken by the solicitor along the way. The Court of Appeal decision in Tallcree First Nation v Rath & Company, 2022 ABCA 174 is an example of what can happen on a review once the results of the case are 113 Here, there is no information as to what, if any steps, tha......
2 cases
-
Stanchfield v Doe,
...that would include an assessment of reasonableness of the contingency fee agreement: Tallcree First Nation v Rath & Company, 2022 ABCA 174 at para 57; Morrison v Rod Pantony Professional Corp, 2008 ABCA 145 at para 9 Mr. Denis relies on his Contingency Agreement, which is dated April 21......
-
Mikisew Cree First Nation v Rath,
...result, and the risks taken by the solicitor along the way. The Court of Appeal decision in Tallcree First Nation v Rath & Company, 2022 ABCA 174 is an example of what can happen on a review once the results of the case are 113 Here, there is no information as to what, if any steps, tha......