Tallcree First Nation v Rath & Company, 2022 ABCA 174
| Judge | Feehan,Slatter,Wakeling |
| Citation | 2022 ABCA 174 |
| Docket Number | 2003-0179AC; 2103-0093AC |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Alberta) |
| Date | 11 May 2022 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
4 practice notes
-
Stanchfield v Doe,
...that would include an assessment of reasonableness of the contingency fee agreement: Tallcree First Nation v Rath & Company, 2022 ABCA 174 at para 57; Morrison v Rod Pantony Professional Corp, 2008 ABCA 145 at para 9 Mr. Denis relies on his Contingency Agreement, which is dated April 21......
-
Bertram Family Trust v Felesky Flynn LLP,
...of fact are determined on the palpable and overriding error standard: Tallcree First Nation v Rath & Co, 2020 ABQB 592, aff'd 2022 ABCA 174, at para 38 Issues of jurisdiction and procedural fairness are questions of law and attract a correctness standard of review. The assessment of the......
-
Tallcree First Nation v Rath & Company,
...Rath and Company and Jeffrey Rath (“Rath”) have paid monies into Court in early 2024 after the Court of Appeal dismissed his appeal at 2022 ABCA 174, and the Supreme Court of Canada subsequently refused Rath's leave 2 These reasons now deal with who the “unreasonable fee” amount of $8,518,0......
-
Mikisew Cree First Nation v Rath,
...result, and the risks taken by the solicitor along the way. The Court of Appeal decision in Tallcree First Nation v Rath & Company, 2022 ABCA 174 is an example of what can happen on a review once the results of the case are 113 Here, there is no information as to what, if any steps, tha......
4 cases
-
Stanchfield v Doe,
...that would include an assessment of reasonableness of the contingency fee agreement: Tallcree First Nation v Rath & Company, 2022 ABCA 174 at para 57; Morrison v Rod Pantony Professional Corp, 2008 ABCA 145 at para 9 Mr. Denis relies on his Contingency Agreement, which is dated April 21......
-
Bertram Family Trust v Felesky Flynn LLP,
...of fact are determined on the palpable and overriding error standard: Tallcree First Nation v Rath & Co, 2020 ABQB 592, aff'd 2022 ABCA 174, at para 38 Issues of jurisdiction and procedural fairness are questions of law and attract a correctness standard of review. The assessment of the......
-
Tallcree First Nation v Rath & Company,
...Rath and Company and Jeffrey Rath (“Rath”) have paid monies into Court in early 2024 after the Court of Appeal dismissed his appeal at 2022 ABCA 174, and the Supreme Court of Canada subsequently refused Rath's leave 2 These reasons now deal with who the “unreasonable fee” amount of $8,518,0......
-
Mikisew Cree First Nation v Rath,
...result, and the risks taken by the solicitor along the way. The Court of Appeal decision in Tallcree First Nation v Rath & Company, 2022 ABCA 174 is an example of what can happen on a review once the results of the case are 113 Here, there is no information as to what, if any steps, tha......