Tallcree First Nation v Rath & Company,
| Judge | Feehan,Slatter,Wakeling |
| Citation | 2022 ABCA 174 |
| Docket Number | 2003-0179AC; 2103-0093AC |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Alberta) |
| Date | 11 May 2022 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
8 practice notes
-
Bertram Family Trust v Felesky Flynn LLP,
...should not routinely be able to walk away from agreements they have made with their lawyers”: Tallcree First Nation v Rath & Company, 2022 ABCA 174 at para 58 [ Tallcree b) Second appeals 22 Generally, there is only one appeal as of right and granting permission for a second appeal is a......
-
Stanchfield v Doe,
...that would include an assessment of reasonableness of the contingency fee agreement: Tallcree First Nation v Rath & Company, 2022 ABCA 174 at para 57; Morrison v Rod Pantony Professional Corp, 2008 ABCA 145 at para 9 Mr. Denis relies on his Contingency Agreement, which is dated April 21......
-
Solis v Sfakianakis,
...that would include an assessment of reasonableness of the contingency fee agreement: Tallcree First Nation v Rath & Company, 2022 ABCA 174 at para 57; Morrison v Rod Pantony Professional Corp, 2008 ABCA 145 at para 25; Stanchfield v Doe, 2023 ABKB 273 at para 8; Sturgeon Lake Cree Natio......
-
Bertram Family Trust v Felesky Flynn LLP,
...of fact are determined on the palpable and overriding error standard: Tallcree First Nation v Rath & Co, 2020 ABQB 592, aff'd 2022 ABCA 174, at para 38 Issues of jurisdiction and procedural fairness are questions of law and attract a correctness standard of review. The assessment of the......
Get Started for Free
9 cases
-
Bertram Family Trust v Felesky Flynn LLP,
...should not routinely be able to walk away from agreements they have made with their lawyers”: Tallcree First Nation v Rath & Company, 2022 ABCA 174 at para 58 [ Tallcree b) Second appeals 22 Generally, there is only one appeal as of right and granting permission for a second appeal is a......
-
Stanchfield v Doe,
...that would include an assessment of reasonableness of the contingency fee agreement: Tallcree First Nation v Rath & Company, 2022 ABCA 174 at para 57; Morrison v Rod Pantony Professional Corp, 2008 ABCA 145 at para 9 Mr. Denis relies on his Contingency Agreement, which is dated April 21......
-
Solis v Sfakianakis,
...that would include an assessment of reasonableness of the contingency fee agreement: Tallcree First Nation v Rath & Company, 2022 ABCA 174 at para 57; Morrison v Rod Pantony Professional Corp, 2008 ABCA 145 at para 25; Stanchfield v Doe, 2023 ABKB 273 at para 8; Sturgeon Lake Cree Natio......
-
Bertram Family Trust v Felesky Flynn LLP,
...of fact are determined on the palpable and overriding error standard: Tallcree First Nation v Rath & Co, 2020 ABQB 592, aff'd 2022 ABCA 174, at para 38 Issues of jurisdiction and procedural fairness are questions of law and attract a correctness standard of review. The assessment of the......
Get Started for Free