Tang v. Cheng, 2020 BCSC 1341
Jurisdiction | British Columbia |
Court | Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada) |
Judge | Master Elwood |
Citation | 2020 BCSC 1341 |
Docket Number | E193003 |
Date | 10 September 2020 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
2 practice notes
-
Kadyschuk v. Behan,
...the evidence is properly developed or there are exceptional circumstances: I.F. v. R.J.R., 2015 BCSC 793, at para. 130; Tang v. Cheng, 2020 BCSC 1341 at para. 108. Neither is the case here. [34] The claimant’s income for support purposes is $45,814......
-
Morrison v. Morrison,
...general rule with respect to movable property is that it passes under the law of the deceased’s domicile at death: Tang v. Cheng, 2020 BCSC 1341 at para. 62, citing Tezcan v. Tezcan (1992), 87 D.L.R. (4th) (B.C.C.A). Similarly, a foreign personal representative is not to be sued in a......
2 cases
-
Kadyschuk v. Behan,
...the evidence is properly developed or there are exceptional circumstances: I.F. v. R.J.R., 2015 BCSC 793, at para. 130; Tang v. Cheng, 2020 BCSC 1341 at para. 108. Neither is the case here. [34] The claimant’s income for support purposes is $45,814......
-
Morrison v. Morrison,
...general rule with respect to movable property is that it passes under the law of the deceased’s domicile at death: Tang v. Cheng, 2020 BCSC 1341 at para. 62, citing Tezcan v. Tezcan (1992), 87 D.L.R. (4th) (B.C.C.A). Similarly, a foreign personal representative is not to be sued in a......