Tarko et al. v. Metropolitan Toronto Condominium Corp. No. 626 et al., [2015] O.A.C. Uned. 174 (DC)

JurisdictionOntario
Subject MatterREAL PROPERTY,TORTS,PRACTICE,LIMITATION OF ACTIONS
Citation[2015] O.A.C. Uned. 174 (DC),[2015] O.A.C. Uned. 174,2015 ONSC 982
CourtSuperior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
Date13 February 2015
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
2 practice notes
  • Bose v. Bangiya Parishad Toronto,
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • January 6, 2021
    ...[28]           In Tarko et al v. Metropolitan Condominium Corporation 626 et al, 2015 ONSC 982, Marrocco A.C.J.S.C. dealt with the issue of adequacy of reasons. In that decision he cited R. v. Sheppard, 2002 SCC 26, [2002] 1 S.C.R. 869, wher......
  • Smith v. Youthlink Youth Services, 2020 ONSC 7624
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • December 14, 2020
    ... In Tarko et al v. Metropolitan Condominium Corporation 626 et al, 2015 ONSC 982, Marrocco A.C.J.S.C. dealt with the issue of adequacy of reasons. In that decision he cited R. v. Sheppard, 2002 SCC 26, [2002] 1 S.C.R. 869, where at para. 42, the Supreme Court quotes with approval the f......
2 cases
  • Bose v. Bangiya Parishad Toronto,
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • January 6, 2021
    ...[28]           In Tarko et al v. Metropolitan Condominium Corporation 626 et al, 2015 ONSC 982, Marrocco A.C.J.S.C. dealt with the issue of adequacy of reasons. In that decision he cited R. v. Sheppard, 2002 SCC 26, [2002] 1 S.C.R. 869, wher......
  • Smith v. Youthlink Youth Services, 2020 ONSC 7624
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • December 14, 2020
    ... In Tarko et al v. Metropolitan Condominium Corporation 626 et al, 2015 ONSC 982, Marrocco A.C.J.S.C. dealt with the issue of adequacy of reasons. In that decision he cited R. v. Sheppard, 2002 SCC 26, [2002] 1 S.C.R. 869, where at para. 42, the Supreme Court quotes with approval the f......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT