Teed v. Teed, 2002 NBQB 230

JudgeGraser, J.
CourtCourt of Queen's Bench of New Brunswick (Canada)
Case DateWednesday July 03, 2002
JurisdictionNew Brunswick
Citations2002 NBQB 230;[2002] N.B.R.(2d) Uned. 78 (FD);[2002] N.B.R.(2d) Uned. 78
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
3 practice notes
  • Spousal Support on or after Divorce
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Archive Canadian Family Law. Seventh Edition
    • 29 Agosto 2017
    ...of the original application but 4 Baiu v Baiu , 2015 ONCA 288. 5 See, for example, Petrunia v Petrunia , 2012 ABQB 568; Teed v Teed , 2002 NBQB 230; Penney v Penney , 2006 NLUFC 17; Smith v Smith , [1998] NSJ No 583 (SC). 6 Vickers v Vickers , [2001] NSJ No 218 (CA). For the suggestion that......
  • Spousal Support on or After Divorce
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Canadian Family Law - Ninth edition
    • 25 Julio 2022
    ...to the “means and needs” of the parties, the 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 See, for example, Petrunia v Petrunia, 2012 ABQB 568; Teed v Teed, 2002 NBQB 230; Penney v Penney, 2006 NLUFC 17; Smith v Smith, [1998] NSJ No 583 Vickers v Vickers, [2001] NSJ No 218 (CA). For the suggestion that nominal ord......
  • Spousal Support on or after Divorce
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Archive Canadian Family Law. Eighth Edition
    • 3 Agosto 2020
    ...see Droit de la famille — 182390, 2018 QCCA 1940 at paras 39–42. See, for example, Petrunia v Petrunia, 2012 ABQB 568; Teed v Teed, 2002 NBQB 230; Penney v Penney, 2006 NLUFC 17; Smith v Smith, [1998] NSJ No 583 Chapter 8: Spousal Support on or After Divorce spousal support may be vacated o......
3 books & journal articles
  • Spousal Support on or After Divorce
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Canadian Family Law - Ninth edition
    • 25 Julio 2022
    ...to the “means and needs” of the parties, the 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 See, for example, Petrunia v Petrunia, 2012 ABQB 568; Teed v Teed, 2002 NBQB 230; Penney v Penney, 2006 NLUFC 17; Smith v Smith, [1998] NSJ No 583 Vickers v Vickers, [2001] NSJ No 218 (CA). For the suggestion that nominal ord......
  • Spousal Support on or after Divorce
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Archive Canadian Family Law. Seventh Edition
    • 29 Agosto 2017
    ...of the original application but 4 Baiu v Baiu , 2015 ONCA 288. 5 See, for example, Petrunia v Petrunia , 2012 ABQB 568; Teed v Teed , 2002 NBQB 230; Penney v Penney , 2006 NLUFC 17; Smith v Smith , [1998] NSJ No 583 (SC). 6 Vickers v Vickers , [2001] NSJ No 218 (CA). For the suggestion that......
  • Spousal Support on or after Divorce
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Archive Canadian Family Law. Eighth Edition
    • 3 Agosto 2020
    ...see Droit de la famille — 182390, 2018 QCCA 1940 at paras 39–42. See, for example, Petrunia v Petrunia, 2012 ABQB 568; Teed v Teed, 2002 NBQB 230; Penney v Penney, 2006 NLUFC 17; Smith v Smith, [1998] NSJ No 583 Chapter 8: Spousal Support on or After Divorce spousal support may be vacated o......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT