Teed v. Teed

JurisdictionNew Brunswick
CourtCourt of Queen's Bench of New Brunswick (Canada)
JudgeGraser, J.
Citation2002 NBQB 230,[2002] N.B.R.(2d) Uned. 78 (FD),[2002] N.B.R.(2d) Uned. 78
Date03 July 2002
Subject MatterFAMILY LAW

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
5 practice notes
  • Spousal Support on or after Divorce
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Archive Canadian Family Law. Seventh Edition
    • August 29, 2017
    ...of the original application but 4 Baiu v Baiu , 2015 ONCA 288. 5 See, for example, Petrunia v Petrunia , 2012 ABQB 568; Teed v Teed , 2002 NBQB 230; Penney v Penney , 2006 NLUFC 17; Smith v Smith , [1998] NSJ No 583 (SC). 6 Vickers v Vickers , [2001] NSJ No 218 (CA). For the suggestion that......
  • Chapter 8: Spousal Support on or After Divorce
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Archive Canadian Family Law (Tenth Edition)
    • April 14, 2025
    ...see Droit de la famille — 182390, 2018 QCCA 1940 at paras 39–42. See, for example, Petrunia v Petrunia, 2012 ABQB 568; Teed v Teed, 2002 NBQB 230; Penney v 2006 NLUFC 17; Smith v Smith, [1998] NSJ No 583 (SC). Canadian Family Law 10e.indb 186 11/18/2024 10:53:30 AM Spousal Support on or Aft......
  • Spousal Support on or After Divorce
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Canadian Family Law - Ninth edition
    • July 25, 2022
    ...to the “means and needs” of the parties, the 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 See, for example, Petrunia v Petrunia, 2012 ABQB 568; Teed v Teed, 2002 NBQB 230; Penney v Penney, 2006 NLUFC 17; Smith v Smith, [1998] NSJ No 583 Vickers v Vickers, [2001] NSJ No 218 (CA). For the suggestion that nominal ord......
  • Table of Cases
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Archive Canadian Family Law (Tenth Edition)
    • April 14, 2025
    ...[2003] BCJ No 2554 (CA) 440 Tedham v Tedham, 2003 BCCA 600 273 Tedham v Tedham, 2005 BCCA 502 203, 204, 229, 232, 298 Teed v Teed, 2002 NBQB 230 186 Tefera v Yergu, 2002 ABQB 215 24 Teitler v Dale, 2017 ONSC 248 409 Terracol v Terracol, 2010 ONSC 6442 414 Terry v Terry Estate (1994), 1 BCLR......
  • Get Started for Free
5 books & journal articles
  • Spousal Support on or after Divorce
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Archive Canadian Family Law. Seventh Edition
    • August 29, 2017
    ...of the original application but 4 Baiu v Baiu , 2015 ONCA 288. 5 See, for example, Petrunia v Petrunia , 2012 ABQB 568; Teed v Teed , 2002 NBQB 230; Penney v Penney , 2006 NLUFC 17; Smith v Smith , [1998] NSJ No 583 (SC). 6 Vickers v Vickers , [2001] NSJ No 218 (CA). For the suggestion that......
  • Chapter 8: Spousal Support on or After Divorce
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Archive Canadian Family Law (Tenth Edition)
    • April 14, 2025
    ...see Droit de la famille — 182390, 2018 QCCA 1940 at paras 39–42. See, for example, Petrunia v Petrunia, 2012 ABQB 568; Teed v Teed, 2002 NBQB 230; Penney v 2006 NLUFC 17; Smith v Smith, [1998] NSJ No 583 (SC). Canadian Family Law 10e.indb 186 11/18/2024 10:53:30 AM Spousal Support on or Aft......
  • Spousal Support on or After Divorce
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Canadian Family Law - Ninth edition
    • July 25, 2022
    ...to the “means and needs” of the parties, the 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 See, for example, Petrunia v Petrunia, 2012 ABQB 568; Teed v Teed, 2002 NBQB 230; Penney v Penney, 2006 NLUFC 17; Smith v Smith, [1998] NSJ No 583 Vickers v Vickers, [2001] NSJ No 218 (CA). For the suggestion that nominal ord......
  • Table of Cases
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Archive Canadian Family Law (Tenth Edition)
    • April 14, 2025
    ...[2003] BCJ No 2554 (CA) 440 Tedham v Tedham, 2003 BCCA 600 273 Tedham v Tedham, 2005 BCCA 502 203, 204, 229, 232, 298 Teed v Teed, 2002 NBQB 230 186 Tefera v Yergu, 2002 ABQB 215 24 Teitler v Dale, 2017 ONSC 248 409 Terracol v Terracol, 2010 ONSC 6442 414 Terry v Terry Estate (1994), 1 BCLR......
  • Get Started for Free