Société Telus Communications et al. v. Peracomo Inc. et al.
| Jurisdiction | Federal Jurisdiction (Canada) |
| Judge | McLachlin, C.J.C., Rothstein, Cromwell, Karakatsanis and Wagner, JJ. |
| Date | 23 April 2014 |
| Citation | [2014] N.R. TBEd. AP.012,2014 SCC 29,[2014] 1 SCR 621,[2014] SCJ No 29 (QL) |
| Court | Supreme Court (Canada) |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
42 practice notes
-
Febles v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration)
...J. (dissenting) Yugraneft Corp. v. Rexx Management Corp., 2010 SCC 19, [2010] 1 S.C.R. 649; Peracomo Inc. v. TELUS Communications Co., 2014 SCC 29, [2014] 1 S.C.R. 621; Pushpanathan v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), [1998] 1 S.C.R. 982; Ezokola v. Canada (Citizenship and ......
-
Del Giudice v. Thompson
...Taschereau, Fauteux, Abbott, Martland, Judson and Ritchie JJ.: dissenting).  See also: Peracomo Inc. v. TELUS Communications Co., 2014 SCC 29; Hurst v. PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, [2009] O.J. No. 1415 (S.C.J.); R. v. Gosset, [1993] 3 S.C.R. 76; R. v. Tutton, [1989] 1 S.C.R. 1392; Sansr......
-
R. v. Fearon
...data-vids="">122 cases, 14 other sources SUPREME COURT OF CANADA Citation: R. v. Fearon, 2014 SCC 77, [2014] S.C.R. 621 Date: Docket: 35298 Between: Kevin Fearon Appellant and Her Majesty The Queen Respondent - and - Director of Public Prosecutions of Canada, Attorney General of Quebec, Att......
-
Table Of Cases
...842, 986 Peracomo Inc et al v TELUS Communications Company et al, 2011 FC 494, aff’d 2012 FCA 199, var’d 2014 SCC 29 ......................... 940−41 Perrigoue v British Columbia Ferry Authority, [1966] Ex CR 744, 1966 CarswellNat 351 ..............................................................
Get Started for Free
26 cases
-
Febles v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration)
...J. (dissenting) Yugraneft Corp. v. Rexx Management Corp., 2010 SCC 19, [2010] 1 S.C.R. 649; Peracomo Inc. v. TELUS Communications Co., 2014 SCC 29, [2014] 1 S.C.R. 621; Pushpanathan v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), [1998] 1 S.C.R. 982; Ezokola v. Canada (Citizenship and ......
-
Del Giudice v. Thompson
...Taschereau, Fauteux, Abbott, Martland, Judson and Ritchie JJ.: dissenting).  See also: Peracomo Inc. v. TELUS Communications Co., 2014 SCC 29; Hurst v. PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, [2009] O.J. No. 1415 (S.C.J.); R. v. Gosset, [1993] 3 S.C.R. 76; R. v. Tutton, [1989] 1 S.C.R. 1392; Sansr......
-
R. v. Fearon
...data-vids="">122 cases, 14 other sources SUPREME COURT OF CANADA Citation: R. v. Fearon, 2014 SCC 77, [2014] S.C.R. 621 Date: Docket: 35298 Between: Kevin Fearon Appellant and Her Majesty The Queen Respondent - and - Director of Public Prosecutions of Canada, Attorney General of Quebec, Att......
-
Febles v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration)
...of Article 31 results in ambiguity or a result which is "manifestly absurd or unreasonable": Peracomo Inc. v. TELUS Communications Co. , 2014 SCC 29, at para. 100. [91] In Pushpanathan v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) , [1998] 1 S.C.R. 982, Bastarache J. described the app......
Get Started for Free
5 firm's commentaries
-
World-Class Tanker Safety System (Mar-Times Newsletter, February 2015)
...is a sampling of those of greater significance that have arisen in various areas of admiralty practice. Peracomo v. Telus Communication, 2014 SCC 29 In a much awaited decision, the Supreme Court of Canada examined the standard of fault constituting conduct barring limitation under Article 4......
-
Ontario's Bill 218 Proposes Limiting Liability For COVID-related Claims
...v. Murray, [1942] S.C.R. 141 (S.C.C.). See also the recent discussion of these cases in Société Telus Communications v. Peracomo Inc., 2014 SCC 29. The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specifi......
-
Supreme Court Of Canada Weighs In On Conduct Barring Limitation
...INC. v. TELUS COMMUNICATIONS CO. 2014 SCC 29 The difference between intentionally or recklessly causing a loss and willful In a much awaited decision, the Supreme Court of Canada examined the standard of fault constituting conduct barring limitation under Article 4 of the Convention on Limi......
-
Supreme Court Of Canada Expands Scope Of 'Wilful Misconduct' Marine Exclusion No Intent Required
...analysis will remain limited to the statutory exclusions in marine insurance. Footnotes 1 Société Telus Communications v. Peracomo Inc. 2014 SCC 29 (S.C.C.) 2 See the trial judge's reasons at 2011 FC 494 (Eng.) (F.C.) at para. 40. 3 Notably, M. Vallée did not own or consult any of the marit......
Get Started for Free
9 books & journal articles
-
Table Of Cases
...842, 986 Peracomo Inc et al v TELUS Communications Company et al, 2011 FC 494, aff’d 2012 FCA 199, var’d 2014 SCC 29 ......................... 940−41 Perrigoue v British Columbia Ferry Authority, [1966] Ex CR 744, 1966 CarswellNat 351 ..............................................................
-
The Federal Courts and Admiralty Law
...intent to cause such loss, or recklessly and with knowledge that such loss would probably result. 61 Peracomo v Telus Communications , [2014] 1 SCR 621. [ 481 ] The Federal Co urT oF appeal and The Federal CourT a isherman. However, he did a very stupid thing,” 62 and condemned him for the ......
-
The implementation and interpretation of treaties
...above note 316 at 55–61. Curiously, the same judge proceeded in the reverse order – purpose irst, text second – in Peracomo v Telus , 2014 SCC 29 at paras 24–6. he learned judge’s approach in hibodeau is more in line with the VCLT. Using International Law in Canadian Courts 372 States Incom......
-
Civil Liability for Vessel-Source Pollution
...crew members, and pilots from being held liable, subject to the same requirement imposed Court of Appeal, 2012 FCA 199. At the SCC, 2014 SCC 29, limitation was restored but the shipowner lost the benefits of his insurance coverage. 58 Ibid at para 25. 59 See Chapter 22. 60 See Chapter 10. ......
Get Started for Free