Société Telus Communications et al. v. Peracomo Inc. et al., [2014] N.R. TBEd. AP.012
Jurisdiction | Federal Jurisdiction (Canada) |
Judge | McLachlin, C.J.C., Rothstein, Cromwell, Karakatsanis and Wagner, JJ. |
Subject Matter | PRACTICE,TORTS,INSURANCE,LIMITATION OF ACTIONS |
Citation | [2014] N.R. TBEd. AP.012,2014 SCC 29,[2014] 1 SCR 621,[2014] SCJ No 29 (QL) |
Court | Supreme Court (Canada) |
Date | 23 April 2014 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
34 practice notes
-
R. v. Fearon, [2014] 3 SCR 621
...data-vids="">122 cases, 14 other sources SUPREME COURT OF CANADA Citation: R. v. Fearon, 2014 SCC 77, [2014] S.C.R. 621 Date: Docket: 35298 Between: Kevin Fearon Appellant and Her Majesty The Queen Respondent - and - Director of Public Prosecutions of Canada, Attorney General of Quebec, Att......
-
Del Giudice v. Thompson,
...Taschereau, Fauteux, Abbott, Martland, Judson and Ritchie JJ.: dissenting). See also: Peracomo Inc. v. TELUS Communications Co., 2014 SCC 29; Hurst v. PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, [2009] O.J. No. 1415 (S.C.J.); R. v. Gosset, [1993] 3 S.C.R. 76; R. v. Tutton, [1989] 1 S.C.R. 1392; Sansr......
-
Febles v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), [2014] 3 SCR 431
...J. (dissenting) Yugraneft Corp. v. Rexx Management Corp., 2010 SCC 19, [2010] 1 S.C.R. 649; Peracomo Inc. v. TELUS Communications Co., 2014 SCC 29, [2014] 1 S.C.R. 621; Pushpanathan v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), [1998] 1 S.C.R. 982; Ezokola v. Canada (Citizenship and ......
-
The Federal Courts and Admiralty Law
...intent to cause such loss, or recklessly and with knowledge that such loss would probably result. 61 Peracomo v Telus Communications , [2014] 1 SCR 621. [ 481 ] The Federal Co urT oF appeal and The Federal CourT a isherman. However, he did a very stupid thing,” 62 and condemned him for the ......
Request a trial to view additional results
21 cases
-
R. v. Fearon, [2014] 3 SCR 621
...data-vids="">122 cases, 14 other sources SUPREME COURT OF CANADA Citation: R. v. Fearon, 2014 SCC 77, [2014] S.C.R. 621 Date: Docket: 35298 Between: Kevin Fearon Appellant and Her Majesty The Queen Respondent - and - Director of Public Prosecutions of Canada, Attorney General of Quebec, Att......
-
Del Giudice v. Thompson,
...Taschereau, Fauteux, Abbott, Martland, Judson and Ritchie JJ.: dissenting). See also: Peracomo Inc. v. TELUS Communications Co., 2014 SCC 29; Hurst v. PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, [2009] O.J. No. 1415 (S.C.J.); R. v. Gosset, [1993] 3 S.C.R. 76; R. v. Tutton, [1989] 1 S.C.R. 1392; Sansr......
-
Febles v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), [2014] 3 SCR 431
...J. (dissenting) Yugraneft Corp. v. Rexx Management Corp., 2010 SCC 19, [2010] 1 S.C.R. 649; Peracomo Inc. v. TELUS Communications Co., 2014 SCC 29, [2014] 1 S.C.R. 621; Pushpanathan v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), [1998] 1 S.C.R. 982; Ezokola v. Canada (Citizenship and ......
-
Febles v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), [2014] N.R. TBEd. OC.030
...of Article 31 results in ambiguity or a result which is "manifestly absurd or unreasonable": Peracomo Inc. v. TELUS Communications Co. , 2014 SCC 29, at para. 100. [91] In Pushpanathan v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) , [1998] 1 S.C.R. 982, Bastarache J. described the app......
Request a trial to view additional results
4 firm's commentaries
-
World-Class Tanker Safety System (Mar-Times Newsletter, February 2015)
...is a sampling of those of greater significance that have arisen in various areas of admiralty practice. Peracomo v. Telus Communication, 2014 SCC 29 In a much awaited decision, the Supreme Court of Canada examined the standard of fault constituting conduct barring limitation under Article 4......
-
Supreme Court Of Canada Weighs In On Conduct Barring Limitation
...INC. v. TELUS COMMUNICATIONS CO. 2014 SCC 29 The difference between intentionally or recklessly causing a loss and willful In a much awaited decision, the Supreme Court of Canada examined the standard of fault constituting conduct barring limitation under Article 4 of the Convention on Limi......
-
Supreme Court Of Canada Expands Scope Of 'Wilful Misconduct' Marine Exclusion No Intent Required
...analysis will remain limited to the statutory exclusions in marine insurance. Footnotes 1 Société Telus Communications v. Peracomo Inc. 2014 SCC 29 (S.C.C.) 2 See the trial judge's reasons at 2011 FC 494 (Eng.) (F.C.) at para. 40. 3 Notably, M. Vallée did not own or consult any of the marit......
-
This Week At The SCC (25/04/2014)
...three judgments this week of interest to Canadian businesses and professions. The first, Peracomo Inc. v. TELUS Communications Co., 2014 SCC 29, involved an action against a crab fisherman and his company brought after he deliberately cut a cable lying on a river bottom which, unbeknownst t......
7 books & journal articles
-
Table Of Cases
...842, 986 Peracomo Inc et al v TELUS Communications Company et al, 2011 FC 494, aff’d 2012 FCA 199, var’d 2014 SCC 29 ......................... 940−41 Perrigoue v British Columbia Ferry Authority, [1966] Ex CR 744, 1966 CarswellNat 351 ..............................................................
-
The Federal Courts and Admiralty Law
...intent to cause such loss, or recklessly and with knowledge that such loss would probably result. 61 Peracomo v Telus Communications , [2014] 1 SCR 621. [ 481 ] The Federal Co urT oF appeal and The Federal CourT a isherman. However, he did a very stupid thing,” 62 and condemned him for the ......
-
Civil Liability for Vessel-Source Pollution
...crew members, and pilots from being held liable, subject to the same requirement imposed Court of Appeal, 2012 FCA 199. At the SCC, 2014 SCC 29, limitation was restored but the shipowner lost the benefits of his insurance coverage. 58 Ibid at para 25. 59 See Chapter 22. 60 See Chapter 10. ......
-
Limitation of Liability for Maritime Claims
...MSC Mediterranean Shipping Co SA v Delumar BVBA et al (The MSC Rosa M) , 67 61 Peracomo Inc et al v TELUS Communications Company et al , 2014 SCC 29 at paras 23, 25, and 49 [ Peracomo SCC]. 62 2011 FC 494 [ Peracomo FC], aff’d 2012 FCA 199 ( sub nom Peracomo Inc et al v Société TELUS Commun......
Request a trial to view additional results