The Director of Child and Family Services v GMH, 2018 MBCA 35
| Jurisdiction | Manitoba |
| Judge | Madam Justice Freda M. Steel,Mr. Justice William J. Burnett,Madam Justice Jennifer A. Pfuetzner |
| Citation | 2018 MBCA 35 |
| Docket Number | AH17-30-08953 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Manitoba) |
| Date | 04 April 2018 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
5 practice notes
-
Sawatzky v Sawatzky, 2018 MBCA 102
...35; The Director of Child and Family Services v JG and KB, 2017 MBCA 27 at para 7; and The Director of Child and Family Services v GMH, 2018 MBCA 35 at paras 12, [21] The issue of whether to proceed on the basis of affidavit evidence or to require viva voce evidence arises under a number of......
-
A.M. v Ministry of Social Services, 2020 SKCA 114
...rights (see K.L.W. at para 136). [176] In The Director of Child and Family Services v G.M.H., 2018 MBCA 35 [G.M.H.], the issue was whether a s. 7 violation resulted from the delay caused when a trial judge, on his own motion, adjourned a child protection hearing, on the day the hearing was ......
-
Dakota Ojibway Child and Family Services v KRF et al, 2018 MBCA 104
...(Director of Child and Family Services) v HH and CG, 2017 MBCA 33 at para 70; and The Director of Child and Family Services v GMH, 2018 MBCA 35 at para 14). Children under apprehension need to have their status determined quickly and fairly. In some cases, the parents’ interests will be ali......
-
CFS Western Manitoba v. A.L.F., 2019 MBQB 15
...opinion is necessary, not just helpful, in determining the best interests of J.K.D. (see The Director of Child and Family Services v GMH, 2018 MBCA 35, at para. [100] Such an opinion is necessary as it is likely to provide information that pertains to the welfare of the ch......
Request a trial to view additional results
5 cases
-
Sawatzky v Sawatzky, 2018 MBCA 102
...35; The Director of Child and Family Services v JG and KB, 2017 MBCA 27 at para 7; and The Director of Child and Family Services v GMH, 2018 MBCA 35 at paras 12, [21] The issue of whether to proceed on the basis of affidavit evidence or to require viva voce evidence arises under a number of......
-
A.M. v Ministry of Social Services, 2020 SKCA 114
...rights (see K.L.W. at para 136). [176] In The Director of Child and Family Services v G.M.H., 2018 MBCA 35 [G.M.H.], the issue was whether a s. 7 violation resulted from the delay caused when a trial judge, on his own motion, adjourned a child protection hearing, on the day the hearing was ......
-
Dakota Ojibway Child and Family Services v KRF et al, 2018 MBCA 104
...(Director of Child and Family Services) v HH and CG, 2017 MBCA 33 at para 70; and The Director of Child and Family Services v GMH, 2018 MBCA 35 at para 14). Children under apprehension need to have their status determined quickly and fairly. In some cases, the parents’ interests will be ali......
-
CFS Western Manitoba v. A.L.F., 2019 MBQB 15
...opinion is necessary, not just helpful, in determining the best interests of J.K.D. (see The Director of Child and Family Services v GMH, 2018 MBCA 35, at para. [100] Such an opinion is necessary as it is likely to provide information that pertains to the welfare of the ch......
Request a trial to view additional results