The Director of Criminal Property and Forfeiture v Gurniak et al, 2020 MBCA 96

JurisdictionManitoba
JudgeMadam Justice Freda M. Steel,Mr. Justice Christopher J. Mainella,Madam Justice Jennifer A. Pfuetzner
Citation2020 MBCA 96
Date06 October 2020
CourtCourt of Appeal (Manitoba)
Docket NumberAI19-30-09313
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
5 practice notes
  • The Director of Criminal Property and Forfeiture v Ramdath et al, 2021 MBCA 23
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Manitoba)
    • 16 Marzo 2021
    ...property to compensate victims of crime (see section 2 of the Act; and The Director of Criminal Property and Forfeiture v Gurniak et al, 2020 MBCA 96 at paras [32] The Act is property-based. Even though the proceedings have parties, proceedings taken under Part 2 of the Act (see sections 3-......
  • The Director of Criminal Property and Forfeiture v Nguyen et al, 2021 MBCA 19
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Manitoba)
    • 9 Marzo 2021
    ...In the recent case of The Director of Criminal Property and Forfeiture v Gurniak et al, 2020 MBCA 96, Steel JA reviewed the history of the CPFA and explained its purpose (at para The purpose of the CPFA is to provide civil remedies that prevent people from profiting from criminal activities......
  • R v Airmaster Sales Ltd, 2021 MBCA 30
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Manitoba)
    • 30 Marzo 2021
    ...in my view, this is no such case (see Borowski at pp 358-63; and The Director of Criminal Property and Forfeiture v Gurniak et al, 2020 MBCA 96 at paras 25-26).  Although the issues of statutory interpretation presented with regards to sections 53(1) and (2) of the POA and section......
  • 2024 BCSC 1456,
    • Canada
    • 1 Enero 2024
    ...79. 12 The Stickney test was fleshed out by the Manitoba Court of Appeal in The Director of Criminal Property and Forfeiture v. Gurniak, 2020 MBCA 96, wherein the Court stated at paras. 39 – 41: [39] When an individual faces a civil proceeding concurrent to a related criminal charge, the co......
  • Get Started for Free
5 cases
  • The Director of Criminal Property and Forfeiture v Ramdath et al, 2021 MBCA 23
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Manitoba)
    • 16 Marzo 2021
    ...property to compensate victims of crime (see section 2 of the Act; and The Director of Criminal Property and Forfeiture v Gurniak et al, 2020 MBCA 96 at paras [32] The Act is property-based. Even though the proceedings have parties, proceedings taken under Part 2 of the Act (see sections 3-......
  • The Director of Criminal Property and Forfeiture v Nguyen et al, 2021 MBCA 19
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Manitoba)
    • 9 Marzo 2021
    ...In the recent case of The Director of Criminal Property and Forfeiture v Gurniak et al, 2020 MBCA 96, Steel JA reviewed the history of the CPFA and explained its purpose (at para The purpose of the CPFA is to provide civil remedies that prevent people from profiting from criminal activities......
  • R v Airmaster Sales Ltd, 2021 MBCA 30
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Manitoba)
    • 30 Marzo 2021
    ...in my view, this is no such case (see Borowski at pp 358-63; and The Director of Criminal Property and Forfeiture v Gurniak et al, 2020 MBCA 96 at paras 25-26).  Although the issues of statutory interpretation presented with regards to sections 53(1) and (2) of the POA and section......
  • 2024 BCSC 1456,
    • Canada
    • 1 Enero 2024
    ...79. 12 The Stickney test was fleshed out by the Manitoba Court of Appeal in The Director of Criminal Property and Forfeiture v. Gurniak, 2020 MBCA 96, wherein the Court stated at paras. 39 – 41: [39] When an individual faces a civil proceeding concurrent to a related criminal charge, the co......
  • Get Started for Free

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT