The Owners, Strata Plan K855 v. Big White Mountain Mart Ltd., 2017 BCCA 438

JurisdictionBritish Columbia
JudgeThe Honourable Madam Justice Saunders,The Honourable Mr. Justice Groberman,The Honourable Mr. Justice Willcock
Citation2017 BCCA 438
Date19 December 2017
CourtCourt of Appeal (British Columbia)
Docket NumberCA43692
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
4 practice notes
  • Cottrill v. Utopia Day Spas and Salons Ltd., 2019 BCCA 26
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (British Columbia)
    • January 24, 2019
    ...the award of trials costs: Reid v. Reid, 2017 BCCA 191 at paras. 13–15; The Owners, Strata Plan K855 v. Big White Mountain Mart Ltd., 2017 BCCA 438 at para. 84. [15] The Company notes that as a result of the appeal having been allowed: (a) the trial judgment was reduced from $19,795.78 to $......
  • Latreille v. Downey, 2020 BCSC 976
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • June 30, 2020
    ...“reasonable” to mitigate a loss involves both a question of fact and law: The Owners, Strata Plan K855 v. Big White Mountain Mart Ltd., 2017 BCCA 438 at para. 66. A defendant is not entitled to complain of a failure to mitigate that is caused, or materially contributed to, by the defendant’......
  • Pearson v. Savage, 2020 BCCA 133
    • Canada
    • British Columbia Court of Appeal (British Columbia)
    • May 8, 2020
    ...“reasonable” to mitigate a loss involves both a question of fact and law: The Owners, Strata Plan K855 v. Big White Mountain Mart Ltd., 2017 BCCA 438 at para. 66. A defendant is not entitled to complain of a failure to mitigate that is caused, or materially contributed to, by the defendant’......
  • Basile v. Doyle, 2022 BCSC 819
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • May 17, 2022
    ...to mitigate a loss involves both a question of fact and law: The Owners, Strata Plan K855 v. Big White Mountain Mart Ltd., 2017 BCCA 438 at para. 66. A defendant is not entitled to complain of a failure to mitigate that is caused, or materially contributed to, by the defendant’s own ......
3 cases
  • Cottrill v. Utopia Day Spas and Salons Ltd., 2019 BCCA 26
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (British Columbia)
    • January 24, 2019
    ...the award of trials costs: Reid v. Reid, 2017 BCCA 191 at paras. 13–15; The Owners, Strata Plan K855 v. Big White Mountain Mart Ltd., 2017 BCCA 438 at para. 84. [15] The Company notes that as a result of the appeal having been allowed: (a) the trial judgment was reduced from $19,795.78 to $......
  • Latreille v. Downey, 2020 BCSC 976
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • June 30, 2020
    ...“reasonable” to mitigate a loss involves both a question of fact and law: The Owners, Strata Plan K855 v. Big White Mountain Mart Ltd., 2017 BCCA 438 at para. 66. A defendant is not entitled to complain of a failure to mitigate that is caused, or materially contributed to, by the defendant’......
  • Basile v. Doyle, 2022 BCSC 819
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • May 17, 2022
    ...to mitigate a loss involves both a question of fact and law: The Owners, Strata Plan K855 v. Big White Mountain Mart Ltd., 2017 BCCA 438 at para. 66. A defendant is not entitled to complain of a failure to mitigate that is caused, or materially contributed to, by the defendant’s own ......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT