Thomas v. Elliott, (1998) 221 A.R. 48 (QBM)
Court | Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada) |
Case Date | March 31, 1998 |
Citations | (1998), 221 A.R. 48 (QBM) |
Thomas v. Elliott (1998), 221 A.R. 48 (QBM)
MLB headnote and full text
Temp. Cite: [1998] A.R. TBEd. JL.106
Joseph Thomas and Aleyamma Thomas (plaintiffs) v. Randy Orlando Todd Elliott (defendant)
(Action No. 9603-25822)
Indexed As: Thomas v. Elliott
Alberta Court of Queen's Bench
Judicial District of Edmonton
Funduk, Master in Chambers
March 31, 1998.
Summary:
The plaintiffs sued the defendant following a motor vehicle accident. During examination for discovery, the defendant's counsel gave an undertaking to produce a statement made to police concerning the accident. The defendant subsequently applied to withdraw the undertaking.
A Master of the Alberta Court of Queen's Bench dismissed the application.
Barristers and Solicitors - Topic 4153
Relations with other lawyers - Undertakings - Withdrawal - The plaintiffs sued the defendant following a motor vehicle accident - During examination for discovery, the defendant's counsel gave an undertaking to produce a statement made to police concerning the accident - The defendant subsequently applied to withdraw the undertaking - A Master of the Alberta Court of Queen's Bench dismissed the application - To be relieved of an undertaking one had to show that the undertaking was given inadvertently (i.e., unintentionally), that the undertaking should not have been given and that the other side had not been prejudiced (or make an offer to repair the prejudice) - Here the test was not met where all the defendant's counsel could say was that he misconceived the law on whether the accident statement was privileged.
Cases Noticed:
Alberta Association of Psychologists v. Schepanovich (1991), 45 C.P.C.(2d) 108 (Alta. C.A.), refd to. [para. 5].
Robinson v. MacWilliams and Levesque (1997), 197 A.R. 394 (Q.B.), refd to. [para. 6].
Uvanile v. Wawanesa Mutual Insurance Co. (1984), 44 C.P.C. 110 (Ont. H.C.), refd to. [para. 10].
Counsel:
W.R. Shaw (Shaw & Tamke), for the plaintiffs;
G.W. Jaycock (Parlee McLaws), for the defendant.
This application was heard before Funduk, Master in Chambers, of the Alberta Court of Queen's Bench, Judicial District of Edmonton, who delivered the following judgment on March 31, 1998.
To continue reading
Request your trial