Thomas v Input Capital Corp., 2020 SKCA 67
| Jurisdiction | Saskatchewan |
| Judge | Whitmore, Schwann and Tholl JJ.A. |
| Citation | 2020 SKCA 67 |
| Docket Number | CACV3220 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan) |
| Date | 03 June 2020 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
8 practice notes
-
The Registration System
...added as a new debtor by registration of a inancing change statement is entitled to make a demand, see Thomas v Input Capital Corp , 2020 SKCA 67 [ Thomas ]. The Ontario provision is worded somewhat diferently owing in part to diferences in the collateral description modalities for inancing......
-
Introduction and General Considerations
...discharge may be made by a “person having an interest in” the property to which the registration relates. 72 Thomas v Input Capital Corp , 2020 SKCA 67 at para 54. I ntroduction and General Considerations 17 3) Secured Party The Act adopts the generic term “secured party” to designate the p......
-
PATEL v. SASKATCHEWAN HEALTH AUTHORITY (formerly the Regina Qu’Appelle Regional Health Authority), 2020 SKQB 194
...screened by counsel to remove irrelevant or unreliable evidence, speculation, argument and opinion. [29] In Thomas v Input Capital Corp., 2020 SKCA 67, Tholl J.A., writing for the Court, said the [31] As noted above, the Chambers judge did not make a ruling on the objections because she was......
-
S.G. v K.B.,
...for this requirement was set out in Wongstedt v Wongstedt, 2017 SKCA 100, [2018] 4 WWR 82, as discussed in Thomas v Input Capital Corp., 2020 SKCA 67, 12 PPSAC (4th) 339: [32] In any Chambers application, it is necessary for the record to be clear with regard to the evidence that is admitte......
Request a trial to view additional results
6 cases
-
PATEL v. SASKATCHEWAN HEALTH AUTHORITY (formerly the Regina Qu’Appelle Regional Health Authority), 2020 SKQB 194
...screened by counsel to remove irrelevant or unreliable evidence, speculation, argument and opinion. [29] In Thomas v Input Capital Corp., 2020 SKCA 67, Tholl J.A., writing for the Court, said the [31] As noted above, the Chambers judge did not make a ruling on the objections because she was......
-
S.G. v K.B.,
...for this requirement was set out in Wongstedt v Wongstedt, 2017 SKCA 100, [2018] 4 WWR 82, as discussed in Thomas v Input Capital Corp., 2020 SKCA 67, 12 PPSAC (4th) 339: [32] In any Chambers application, it is necessary for the record to be clear with regard to the evidence that is admitte......
-
BLOM v. WOLLNER-KALLIS,
...of Ms. Blom’s affidavit. This is in keeping with the approach outlined by the Court of Appeal in Thomas v Input Capital Corp., 2020 SKCA 67, 12 PPSAC (4th) 339, and Wongstedt v Wongstedt, 2017 SKCA 100, 3 RFL (8th) 43, where at para. 38 it was acknowledged that it would be appropriat......
-
BURTON v. THE KINGSLEY CONSERVATION AND DEVELOPMENT AREA AUTHORITY et al.,
...methodology set out in Wongstedt v Wongstedt, 2017 SKCA 100 at paras 38 and 39, 3 RFL (8th) 43. See also: Thomas v Input Capital Corp., 2020 SKCA 67 at para 34; S.G. v K.B., 2021 SKCA 133 at para (i) Affidavit of the Secretary Sworn June 29, 2021 [91] ......
Request a trial to view additional results
2 books & journal articles
-
The Registration System
...added as a new debtor by registration of a inancing change statement is entitled to make a demand, see Thomas v Input Capital Corp , 2020 SKCA 67 [ Thomas ]. The Ontario provision is worded somewhat diferently owing in part to diferences in the collateral description modalities for inancing......
-
Introduction and General Considerations
...discharge may be made by a “person having an interest in” the property to which the registration relates. 72 Thomas v Input Capital Corp , 2020 SKCA 67 at para 54. I ntroduction and General Considerations 17 3) Secured Party The Act adopts the generic term “secured party” to designate the p......