Thomas v Quinlan, 2020 SKCA 82
| Jurisdiction | Saskatchewan |
| Judge | Ottenbreit, Schwann and Kalmakoff JJ.A. |
| Date | 08 July 2020 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan) |
| Docket Number | CACV3404 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
4 practice notes
-
R v Williams, 2020 SKCA 108
...make submissions “with respect to any facts relevant to the sentence to be imposed”. As this Court recently observed in Thomas v Quinlan 2020 SKCA 82 [Thomas], while “sentencing judges are entitled to accept non-contentious facts” put to the court in sentencing submissions, “factual asserti......
-
S.B. v. S.H.,
...he distributed intimate images of S.B., contrary to s. 162.1(2) of the Criminal Code. As Schwann J.A. noted in Thomas v Quinlan, 2020 SKCA 82, 64 MVR (7th) [58] ... It is beyond dispute that a plea of guilty in a criminal proceeding is considered an admission by an accused of hav......
-
Yorkton (City) v Mi-Sask Industries Ltd.,
...applied in other decisions of this Court: see, for example, Deren v SaskPower, 2017 SKCA 104 at para 41 [Deren]; and Thomas v Quinlan, 2020 SKCA 82 at para 30, 64 MVR (7th) 175 [25] In my opinion, Archibald, Deren and Thomas are correct. The palpable and overriding error standard of review ......
-
PATIENT X v. UKABAM,
...a subsequent civil action has its own complexities (see, e.g., R v Caesar, 2016 ONCA 599 at para 46, 339 CCC (3d) 354; Thomas v Quinlan, 2020 SKCA 82 at paras 55-60, 64 MVR (7th) 175). Dr. Ukabam’s prior court testimony is not in evidence in this action but – to state the obvi......
4 cases
-
R v Williams, 2020 SKCA 108
...make submissions “with respect to any facts relevant to the sentence to be imposed”. As this Court recently observed in Thomas v Quinlan 2020 SKCA 82 [Thomas], while “sentencing judges are entitled to accept non-contentious facts” put to the court in sentencing submissions, “factual asserti......
-
Yorkton (City) v Mi-Sask Industries Ltd.,
...applied in other decisions of this Court: see, for example, Deren v SaskPower, 2017 SKCA 104 at para 41 [Deren]; and Thomas v Quinlan, 2020 SKCA 82 at para 30, 64 MVR (7th) 175 [25] In my opinion, Archibald, Deren and Thomas are correct. The palpable and overriding error standard of review ......
-
S.B. v. S.H.,
...he distributed intimate images of S.B., contrary to s. 162.1(2) of the Criminal Code. As Schwann J.A. noted in Thomas v Quinlan, 2020 SKCA 82, 64 MVR (7th) [58] ... It is beyond dispute that a plea of guilty in a criminal proceeding is considered an admission by an accused of hav......
-
PATIENT X v. UKABAM,
...a subsequent civil action has its own complexities (see, e.g., R v Caesar, 2016 ONCA 599 at para 46, 339 CCC (3d) 354; Thomas v Quinlan, 2020 SKCA 82 at paras 55-60, 64 MVR (7th) 175). Dr. Ukabam’s prior court testimony is not in evidence in this action but – to state the obvi......