Thomas v Quinlan, 2020 SKCA 82

JurisdictionSaskatchewan
JudgeOttenbreit, Schwann and Kalmakoff JJ.A.
Citation2020 SKCA 82
Date08 July 2020
CourtCourt of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
Docket NumberCACV3404
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
4 practice notes
  • R v Williams, 2020 SKCA 108
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
    • September 9, 2020
    ...make submissions “with respect to any facts relevant to the sentence to be imposed”. As this Court recently observed in Thomas v Quinlan 2020 SKCA 82 [Thomas], while “sentencing judges are entitled to accept non-contentious facts” put to the court in sentencing submissions, “factual asserti......
  • Yorkton (City) v Mi-Sask Industries Ltd., 2021 SKCA 43
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
    • March 19, 2021
    ...applied in other decisions of this Court: see, for example, Deren v SaskPower, 2017 SKCA 104 at para 41 [Deren]; and Thomas v Quinlan, 2020 SKCA 82 at para 30, 64 MVR (7th) 175 [25] In my opinion, Archibald, Deren and Thomas are correct. The palpable and overriding error standard of review ......
  • S.B. v. S.H., 2022 SKKB 216
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Saskatchewan (Canada)
    • September 26, 2022
    ...he distributed intimate images of S.B., contrary to s. 162.1(2) of the Criminal Code.  As Schwann J.A. noted in Thomas v Quinlan, 2020 SKCA 82, 64 MVR (7th) [58] ... It is beyond dispute that a plea of guilty in a criminal proceeding is considered an admission by an accused of hav......
  • PATIENT X v. UKABAM, 2023 SKKB 69
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Saskatchewan (Canada)
    • January 1, 2023
    ...a subsequent civil action has its own complexities (see, e.g., R v Caesar, 2016 ONCA 599 at para 46, 339 CCC (3d) 354; Thomas v Quinlan, 2020 SKCA 82 at paras 55-60, 64 MVR (7th) 175). Dr. Ukabam’s prior court testimony is not in evidence in this action but – to state the obvi......
4 cases
  • R v Williams, 2020 SKCA 108
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
    • September 9, 2020
    ...make submissions “with respect to any facts relevant to the sentence to be imposed”. As this Court recently observed in Thomas v Quinlan 2020 SKCA 82 [Thomas], while “sentencing judges are entitled to accept non-contentious facts” put to the court in sentencing submissions, “factual asserti......
  • Yorkton (City) v Mi-Sask Industries Ltd.,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
    • March 19, 2021
    ...applied in other decisions of this Court: see, for example, Deren v SaskPower, 2017 SKCA 104 at para 41 [Deren]; and Thomas v Quinlan, 2020 SKCA 82 at para 30, 64 MVR (7th) 175 [25] In my opinion, Archibald, Deren and Thomas are correct. The palpable and overriding error standard of review ......
  • S.B. v. S.H.,
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Saskatchewan (Canada)
    • September 26, 2022
    ...he distributed intimate images of S.B., contrary to s. 162.1(2) of the Criminal Code.  As Schwann J.A. noted in Thomas v Quinlan, 2020 SKCA 82, 64 MVR (7th) [58] ... It is beyond dispute that a plea of guilty in a criminal proceeding is considered an admission by an accused of hav......
  • PATIENT X v. UKABAM,
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Saskatchewan (Canada)
    • January 1, 2023
    ...a subsequent civil action has its own complexities (see, e.g., R v Caesar, 2016 ONCA 599 at para 46, 339 CCC (3d) 354; Thomas v Quinlan, 2020 SKCA 82 at paras 55-60, 64 MVR (7th) 175). Dr. Ukabam’s prior court testimony is not in evidence in this action but – to state the obvi......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT