Thomas v. Wohleber, 2020 ONSC 1965
| Jurisdiction | Ontario |
| Judge | Kurz |
| Citation | 2020 ONSC 1965 |
| Docket Number | 43117/20 |
| Court | Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada) |
| Date | 30 March 2020 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
57 practice notes
-
Ukiri v. Erskine, 2020 ONSC 4294
...determination, prima fascia, that the motion was urgent. [44] Applying the test for urgency set out by Kurz, J, in Thomas v. Wohleber, 2020 ONSC 1965, at paras. 31 to 38, I have concluded on a full record that this motion is urgent. The motion materials raise an immediate concern about the ......
-
Lokhandwala v. Khan et. al., 2020 ONSC 3209
...[43] The Applicant argues that this matter is not urgent, in part on the basis of the test set out by Kurz J. in Thomas v. Wohleber (2020 ONSC 1965). During the course of the conference call, I first heard submissions from Ms. Boulby on this issue, and then determined that it was not necess......
-
E.“M” B. v. M.F.B., 2020 ONSC 3200
...access was gathered for the most part after she unilaterally decided to suspend access. [13] As stated by Kurz J. in Thomas v. Wohleber, 2020 ONSC 1965, at para. 38, the following factors are necessary in order to meet the Notice’s requirement of 1. The concern must be immediate; that is on......
-
Parenting In A Pandemic: The BC Courts Weigh In
...recent decisions from Ontario courts dealing with parenting issues related to COVID-19. A recent case from Ontario, Thomas v. Wohleber, 2020 ONSC 1965, sets out some factors for the Court to consider in determining whether an issue is urgent. On the same day the Thomas v. Wohleber decision ......
Request a trial to view additional results
55 cases
-
Ukiri v. Erskine, 2020 ONSC 4294
...determination, prima fascia, that the motion was urgent. [44] Applying the test for urgency set out by Kurz, J, in Thomas v. Wohleber, 2020 ONSC 1965, at paras. 31 to 38, I have concluded on a full record that this motion is urgent. The motion materials raise an immediate concern about the ......
-
Lokhandwala v. Khan et. al., 2020 ONSC 3209
...[43] The Applicant argues that this matter is not urgent, in part on the basis of the test set out by Kurz J. in Thomas v. Wohleber (2020 ONSC 1965). During the course of the conference call, I first heard submissions from Ms. Boulby on this issue, and then determined that it was not necess......
-
E.“M” B. v. M.F.B., 2020 ONSC 3200
...access was gathered for the most part after she unilaterally decided to suspend access. [13] As stated by Kurz J. in Thomas v. Wohleber, 2020 ONSC 1965, at para. 38, the following factors are necessary in order to meet the Notice’s requirement of 1. The concern must be immediate; that is on......
-
Lakhtakia v. Mehra, 2020 ONSC 2670
...be reserved for the most urgent cases, as the Notices to the Profession direct (Ribeiro v. Wright, 2020 ONSC 1829; Thomas v. Wohleber 2020 ONSC 1965). [18] The respondent strongly believes that spousal support should be terminated given the short duration of the marriage, the applicant’s in......
Request a trial to view additional results
2 firm's commentaries
-
Parenting In A Pandemic: The BC Courts Weigh In
...recent decisions from Ontario courts dealing with parenting issues related to COVID-19. A recent case from Ontario, Thomas v. Wohleber, 2020 ONSC 1965, sets out some factors for the Court to consider in determining whether an issue is urgent. On the same day the Thomas v. Wohleber decision ......
-
Parenting In A Pandemic: Emerging Trends And A Call For Parental Co-Operation
...para. 22 Chin v. Omeally, supra, para. 15. Chin v. Omeally, supra, para. 15; Skuce v .Skuce, 2020 ONSC 1881, para. 37 Thomas v. Wohleber, 2020 ONSC 1965, paras. 37-38 Thomas v. Wohleber, supra, para. 38. Chin v. Omeally Skuce v .Skuce, 2020 ONSC 1881 Matour v. Hashemian, 2020 ONSC 2112, par......