Thompson v. Canada (Correctional Service), 2018 FC 40
| Jurisdiction | Federal Jurisdiction (Canada) |
| Citation | 2018 FC 40 |
| Court | Federal Court (Canada) |
| Date | 17 January 2018 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
4 practice notes
-
Blair v. Canada (Attorney General), 2022 FC 957
...2016 FC 187, at paragraphs 21, 22, Nome v Canada (Attorney General), 2018 FC 1054 at paragraph 7; Thompson v Canada (Correctional Service), 2018 FC 40 at paragraphs 14 to 17). [45] The Court will intervene and will allow the grievance process to be bypassed where there are exceptional circu......
-
Karas v. Canada (Attorney General), 2020 FC 345
...2006 FC 1245 at paras 11 – 14; Nome v. Canada (Attorney General), 2018 FC 1054 at para 7; Thompson v. Canada (Correctional Service), 2018 FC 40 at paras 14 – 17; and Ouellette v. Canada (Attorney General), 2012 FC 801 at para 33). In MacInnes v. Mountain Institution, 2014 FC 212 [MacInnes] ......
-
Nome v. Canada (Attorney General), 2018 FC 1054
...Having an adequate alternative remedy in the context of inmates has been dealt by this court in Thompson v Canada (Correctional Service), 2018 FC 40. In that case, Justice Southcott reaffirmed that grievance procedures available to offenders affords an adequate alternative remedy to judicia......
-
Eunick v. Canada (Attorney General), 2020 FC 28
...the lower decisions, it is the Grievance Decision itself that is the subject of this review: Thompson v Canada (Correctional Service), 2018 FC 40 at paras 18-20. Mr. Eunick also seeks costs for his application in accordance with the Federal Courts Rules, SOR/98-106. [6] For the r......
4 cases
-
Blair v. Canada (Attorney General), 2022 FC 957
...2016 FC 187, at paragraphs 21, 22, Nome v Canada (Attorney General), 2018 FC 1054 at paragraph 7; Thompson v Canada (Correctional Service), 2018 FC 40 at paragraphs 14 to 17). [45] The Court will intervene and will allow the grievance process to be bypassed where there are exceptional circu......
-
Karas v. Canada (Attorney General), 2020 FC 345
...2006 FC 1245 at paras 11 – 14; Nome v. Canada (Attorney General), 2018 FC 1054 at para 7; Thompson v. Canada (Correctional Service), 2018 FC 40 at paras 14 – 17; and Ouellette v. Canada (Attorney General), 2012 FC 801 at para 33). In MacInnes v. Mountain Institution, 2014 FC 212 [MacInnes] ......
-
Nome v. Canada (Attorney General), 2018 FC 1054
...Having an adequate alternative remedy in the context of inmates has been dealt by this court in Thompson v Canada (Correctional Service), 2018 FC 40. In that case, Justice Southcott reaffirmed that grievance procedures available to offenders affords an adequate alternative remedy to judicia......
-
Eunick v. Canada (Attorney General), 2020 FC 28
...the lower decisions, it is the Grievance Decision itself that is the subject of this review: Thompson v Canada (Correctional Service), 2018 FC 40 at paras 18-20. Mr. Eunick also seeks costs for his application in accordance with the Federal Courts Rules, SOR/98-106. [6] For the r......