Thomson v. Thomson,
| Jurisdiction | Federal Jurisdiction (Canada) |
| Judge | Lamer, Antonio; La Forest, Gérard V.; L'Heureux-Dubé, Claire; Sopinka, John; Gonthier, Charles Doherty; Cory, Peter deCarteret; McLachlin, Beverley; Iacobucci, Frank; Major, John C. |
| Date | 20 October 1994 |
| Citation | [1994] 3 SCR 551,1994 CanLII 26 (SCC),79 WAC 81,[1994] SCJ No 6 (QL),119 DLR (4th) 253,[1994] CarswellMan 91,6 RFL (4th) 290,173 NR 83,97 Man R (2d) 81,[1994] 10 WWR 513,50 ACWS (3d) 812,JE 94-1655 |
| Docket Number | 23794 |
| Court | Supreme Court (Canada) |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
298 practice notes
-
Gordon v. Goertz,
...241, refd to. [para. 86]. D.P. v. C.S., [1993] 4 S.C.R. 141; 159 N.R. 241; 58 Q.A.C. 1, refd to. [para. 86]. Thomson v. Thomson, [1994] 3 S.C.R. 551; 173 N.R. 83; 97 Man.R.(2d) 81; 79 W.A.C. 81, refd to. [para. P. v. P., [1970] 3 All E.R. 659 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 89]. Nash v. Nash, [1973......
-
M.M. v. Canada (Minister of Justice),
...or psychological harm or otherwise place the child in an intolerable situation": art. 13(b). [222] In Thomson v. Thomson , [1994] 3 S.C.R. 551, La Forest J. explained that this risk must "be a weighty one", but also acknowledged that "from a child centred perspective, ha......
-
F. v. N.,
...to: Droit de la famille — 3451, [1999] R.D.F. 641; Droit de la famille — 131294, 2013 QCCA 883, [2013] R.J.Q. 849; Thomson v. Thomson, [1994] 3 S.C.R. 551; Office of the Children’s Lawyer v. Balev, 2018 SCC 16, [2018] 1 S.C.R. 398; Droit de la famille — 15751, 2015 QCCA 638; Geliedan v. Raw......
-
Febles v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration),
...and Immigration), [1998] 1 S.C.R. 982, addendum [1998] 1 S.C.R. 1222; 226 N.R. 201, refd to. [paras. 11, 91]. Thomson v. Thomson, [1994] 3 S.C.R. 551; 173 N.R. 83; 97 Man.R.(2d) 81; 79 W.A.C. 81, refd to. [para. Januzi v. United Kingdom (Secretary of State for the Home Department), [2006] 2......
Get Started for Free
256 cases
-
Gordon v. Goertz,
...241, refd to. [para. 86]. D.P. v. C.S., [1993] 4 S.C.R. 141; 159 N.R. 241; 58 Q.A.C. 1, refd to. [para. 86]. Thomson v. Thomson, [1994] 3 S.C.R. 551; 173 N.R. 83; 97 Man.R.(2d) 81; 79 W.A.C. 81, refd to. [para. P. v. P., [1970] 3 All E.R. 659 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 89]. Nash v. Nash, [1973......
-
M.M. v. Canada (Minister of Justice),
...or psychological harm or otherwise place the child in an intolerable situation": art. 13(b). [222] In Thomson v. Thomson , [1994] 3 S.C.R. 551, La Forest J. explained that this risk must "be a weighty one", but also acknowledged that "from a child centred perspective, ha......
-
F. v. N.,
...to: Droit de la famille — 3451, [1999] R.D.F. 641; Droit de la famille — 131294, 2013 QCCA 883, [2013] R.J.Q. 849; Thomson v. Thomson, [1994] 3 S.C.R. 551; Office of the Children’s Lawyer v. Balev, 2018 SCC 16, [2018] 1 S.C.R. 398; Droit de la famille — 15751, 2015 QCCA 638; Geliedan v. Raw......
-
Febles v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration),
...and Immigration), [1998] 1 S.C.R. 982, addendum [1998] 1 S.C.R. 1222; 226 N.R. 201, refd to. [paras. 11, 91]. Thomson v. Thomson, [1994] 3 S.C.R. 551; 173 N.R. 83; 97 Man.R.(2d) 81; 79 W.A.C. 81, refd to. [para. Januzi v. United Kingdom (Secretary of State for the Home Department), [2006] 2......
Get Started for Free
2 firm's commentaries
-
Court Of Appeal Summaries (September 13 ' 17, 2021)
...Act, 2021 SCC 11, Reference re Pan‑Canadian Securities Regulation, 2018 SCC 48, Geliedan v. Rawdah, 2020 ONCA 254, Thomson v. Thomson, [1994] 3 S.C.R. 551, M.A.A. v. D.E.M.E., 2020 ONCA 486, leave to appeal refused, [2020] S.C.C.A. No. 402, Bolla v. Swart, 2017 ONSC 1488, Fraser v. Canada (......
-
Court Of Appeal Summaries (September 13 ' 17, 2021)
...Act, 2021 SCC 11, Reference re Pan‑Canadian Securities Regulation, 2018 SCC 48, Geliedan v. Rawdah, 2020 ONCA 254, Thomson v. Thomson, [1994] 3 S.C.R. 551, M.A.A. v. D.E.M.E., 2020 ONCA 486, leave to appeal refused, [2020] S.C.C.A. No. 402, Bolla v. Swart, 2017 ONSC 1488, Fraser v. Canada (......
40 books & journal articles
-
Table of Cases
...67 ........................................................................................................... 168 Thomson v Thomson, [1994] 3 SCR 551 ........................................................................................................... 57 Tracy v Iran (Information and......
-
Table of Cases
...and Research, Restrictive Trade Practices Commission), [1990] 1 SCR 425 ............................... 363 homson v homson, [1994] 3 SCR 551 .........................................................................77 Tosti v Canada (Minister of Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness), 20......
-
Sources of International Law
..., [1936] SCR 461 at 488–89, Duf CJ, rev’d on other grounds A-G Canada v A-G Ontario , [1937] AC 326 (JCPC). See also Thomson v Thomson , [1994] 3 SCR 551 at paras 112–14, L’Heureux-Dubé & McLachlin JJ. 17 See, for example, Hon Paul Martin Sr, Secretary of State for External Afairs, Federali......
-
Sources of international law
...Duff CJ, rev’d on other grounds A-G Canada v A-G Ontario , [1937] AC 326 (JCPC) [ Labour Conventions case]. See also Thomson v Thomson , [1994] 3 SCR 551 at paras 112–14, L’Heureux-Dubé & McLachlin JJ. 58 INTERNATIONAL LAW: DOCTRINE, PRACTICE, AND THEORY confirms the widely held view that ......
Get Started for Free