Time Is on Our Side: Colonialism through Laches and Limitations of Actions in the Age of Reconciliation

AuthorSenwung Luk & Brooke Barrett
Pages394-422

TimeIsonOurSide
CO LO NIA LI SMT H RO UG HL AC HES
AN D LIM ITAT IO NS OFAC T IO NS
IN T HEAG EOF RE CO NC I LI AT ION
Senwung Luk*BrookeBarre**
Get overit Thos erea derswh ohave braved thec omme ntse ctio nona l
mostanyonlinenewsarticledeal ingwithinjusticesagainstI ndigenous
peop lesw illb efam ili arw itht hisp hras ean dthe unpr inta blei nvect ive
ladenti radethat usually followsSuch viewsare rightly dismissed as
crueland ignorantofthevery realhistory ofcolonialisma ndgenocide
that Indigenous people have faced throughout Canadashistory and
continue toface tothisdaySuch a sentiment isusual lynot explicitly
voicedinthe genteelchambers ofCanadascourtroomsAsa nillustra
tiveexampletheSupremeCourtofCanadainarecentdecisionsetout
that thereconciliat ionof Aboriginal andnonAborigina lCanadia ns
ina mutuallyrespec tfullongterm relationshipis the grandpurpos e
ofs of theConstitution ActWeargue that there isa special
rolefort hecourts evenmoret hanthe legislativeand executiveactors
ingovernmentin makingmanifest thekindof reconciliationthatsuch
grandstatementsenvisage
Starting withthe paradigmofreconcil iationasset outbythe Can
adiancourtswelookathowthosesamecourtshavebeendealingwith
theissueofl imitationperiodsand lachesSuchdoctrines barthepursuit
 SenwungLukBAYaleJDOsgoodeBCLOxonPartneratOlthui sKleer
TownshendLLPToronto
 BrookeBarreBAUofCLLBUNBLLMUofCAssociateatRaea ndCo
Ca lga ry
 BeckmanvLileSalmonCarm acksFirstNationSCCatparaBeckman
Time Is on Our Side
ofclaims incourt ifthe defendantisable toshowthat theplainti de
layed bringing the claim Such doct rines are often applied when the
Crownas defendantmakes summary judgmentmotionswhere afull
recordof the evidenceis notyet availabletot hecourt Weargue here
thatwherelachesandlimitationsareappliedwithoutthefullconsidera
tion of the historical circ umstances of Indigenous communities and
the very real limits both i n regard to their legal incapacities and the
resource constraints thatthey havefaced inorder tobri nglawsuits to
asserttheirrightsthecourtsriskdoingrealinjusticetothecommunities
thathavecometothemforhelpWhilelimitationsandlachesc anoften
beinst rumentsofju sticewhenthey areused inamec hanisticfash ion
withoutdueconsiderationfor thepartic ularcircu mstancesoft hecase
theycanr evisitandreinforcet hewrongaboutwhicha partyhascome
tothecourtforvindicationWhatisatstakehereisnothinglessthanthe
capacityofthecour tstobepartoftheprocessofreconcil iationthatthe
SupremeCourtofCanadahassograndlyendorsed
A. RECONCILIATION AND THE COURTS
Theidea thatthere is worktobe donein promotingreconci liationbe
tween Indigenous people and nonIndigenous people in Canada has
beena running themeinCa nadianjurisprudenceWhileatthebegin
ningof theSupreme Courtsjurisprudenceon reconciliation theCourt
seemed to suggest that the work ofr econciliation was for Indigenous
people to do in reconciling themselves with the sovereignty of the
Crow n the Court citing the work of the Truth and Reconciliation
CommissionTRChas recently recastthe goal asone ofrebuilding
the Crownsrelationship with Aborig inal peoples in Canada
 Itmay
perhapsbemostappropriatethentolett heTRCspeakonthehistorical
injusticest hathaveledto theneed forreconciliation betweenIndigen
ousandnonIndigenouspeople
 SeeforexampleR v Van der PeetSCRatparaLamerCJpara
McLachlinJdi ssentingVan der PeetR v Sappier; R v GraySCCatpara
Haida Nation v British Columbia (Minister of Forests)SCCatparaMikisew
Cree First Nation v Canada (Minister of Canadian He ritage)SCCatparaBeck-
manabovenoteatparaManitobaMétisFederationvCanadaAor neyGeneral
SCCatparaMMF
 Van der Peetabovenoteatpara
 DanielsvCanadaMinisterofIndianAairsa ndReconciliationSCCatpara

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT