Tompkins v. Workers' Compensation Board Appeals Commission (Alta.), [2012] A.R. Uned. 434

JudgeGates, J.
CourtCourt of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
Subject MatterADMINISTRATIVE LAW,PRACTICE,COURTS
Citation[2012] A.R. Uned. 434,[2012] A.R. Uned. 434 (QB),2012 ABQB 418
Date27 June 2012
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
3 practice notes
  • Tompkins v. Workers' Compensation Board Appeals Commission (Alta.), 2012 ABQB 783
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • 1 Noviembre 2012
    ...Court dismissed a preliminary objection based on the argument that the issues raised by the Applicant were not properly before the Court: 2012 ABQB 418. Issues [26] The Applicant raises two issues: 1) Did the AC err in adopting the medical panel findings without undertaking any legal analys......
  • St. Albert Housing Society et al. v. St. Albert (City) et al., 2016 ABQB 203
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • 7 Abril 2016
    ...of statutory appeal on a question of law or jurisdiction: Tompkins v Alberta (Appeals Commission for Alberta Workers' Compensation) , 2012 ABQB 418. [10] The Applicants distinguish the decision in Precision Drilling Corp v Calgary (City) , 2011 ABQB 503 [ Precision Drilling ]. They submit t......
  • Smith v The Appeal Commission,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Manitoba)
    • 6 Marzo 2023
    ...of law or jurisdiction, fact or mixed fact and law (see Tompkins v Alberta (Appeals Commission for Alberta Workers’ Compensation), 2012 ABQB 418 at paras 20-31; Ewanek at paras 28-32; and Yatar at para 55).  As the applicant notes in her factum, the “coupling”......
3 cases
  • Tompkins v. Workers' Compensation Board Appeals Commission (Alta.), 2012 ABQB 783
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • 1 Noviembre 2012
    ...Court dismissed a preliminary objection based on the argument that the issues raised by the Applicant were not properly before the Court: 2012 ABQB 418. Issues [26] The Applicant raises two issues: 1) Did the AC err in adopting the medical panel findings without undertaking any legal analys......
  • St. Albert Housing Society et al. v. St. Albert (City) et al., 2016 ABQB 203
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • 7 Abril 2016
    ...of statutory appeal on a question of law or jurisdiction: Tompkins v Alberta (Appeals Commission for Alberta Workers' Compensation) , 2012 ABQB 418. [10] The Applicants distinguish the decision in Precision Drilling Corp v Calgary (City) , 2011 ABQB 503 [ Precision Drilling ]. They submit t......
  • Smith v The Appeal Commission,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Manitoba)
    • 6 Marzo 2023
    ...of law or jurisdiction, fact or mixed fact and law (see Tompkins v Alberta (Appeals Commission for Alberta Workers’ Compensation), 2012 ABQB 418 at paras 20-31; Ewanek at paras 28-32; and Yatar at para 55).  As the applicant notes in her factum, the “coupling”......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT