Trempe v. Reybroek et al.,  O.T.C. 85 (SupCt)
|Court:||Superior Court of Justice of Ontario|
|Case Date:||January 16, 2001|
|Citations:|| O.T.C. 85 (SupCt)|
Trempe v. Reybroek,  O.T.C. 85 (SupCt)
MLB headnote and full text
Temp. Cite:  O.T.C. TBEd. FE.041
Donna Trempe, John Trempe and Carson Trempe, by his Litigation Guardian, Donna Trempe (plaintiffs) v. Kelli Reybroek and Todd Reybroek (defendants) and Michael Taylor (proposed intervenor)
(Court File No. 99-CV-179184)
Indexed As: Trempe v. Reybroek et al.
Court of Ontario
Superior Court of Justice
January 29, 2002.
This headnote contains no summary.
Practice - Topic 685.2
Parties - Adding or substituting parties - Intervenors - On a motion - See paragraphs 1 to 27.
Practice - Topic 3112
Applications and motions - Examinations in aid - Persons who may be examined - See paragraphs 28 to 42.
Practice - Topic 3135
Applications and motions - Motions - Evidence - See paragraphs 28 to 42.
Crown Trust Co. v. Rosenberg (1986), 60 O.R.(2d) 87 (H.C.), refd to. [para. 14].
Canada (Attorney General) v. Cardinal Insurance Co.,  O.J. No. 2128 (Gen. Div.), refd to. [para. 15].
Skyepharma plc v. Hyal Pharmaceutical Corp. (2000), 130 O.A.C. 273; 47 O.R.(3d) 234 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 15].
M. v. H. (1994), 20 O.R.(3d) 70 (Gen. Div.), refd to. [para. 18].
Rules of Civil Procedure (Ont.), rule 13.01(1), rule 13.01(2), rule 13.02 [para. 9].
Christine A. Zablocki, for the plaintiff;
Cameron C.R. Godden, for the defendants;
Alexandra Lev-Farrell, for the proposed intervenor.
These motions were heard on January 16, 2001, before Molloy, J., of the Ontario Superior Court, who released the following decision on January 29, 2002.
Please note: The following judgment has not been edited.
To continue readingFREE SIGN UP