Tsinokas v. Kucerak, 2018 ONSC 4154

JudgeBloom, J.
CourtSuperior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
Case DateJuly 06, 2018
JurisdictionOntario
Citations2018 ONSC 4154
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
3 practice notes
  • Martin v. Martin, 2019 ONSC 920
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • February 6, 2019
    ...court has chosen not to apply Rule 24(11) retrospectively to legal services provided prior to July 1, 2018.  Tsinokas v. Kucerak, 2018 ONSC 4154 (July 6, 2018), Kang v. Kang, 2018 ONSC 4943 (August 17, 2018), Schneidermeier v. Bernosky, 2018 ONSC 7052 (November 26, [20]   ......
  • KANG v. KANG, 2018 ONSC 4943
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • August 17, 2018
    ...in any “step” in a family law proceeding regardless of whether or not costs were reserved. I agree with Bloom J. in Tsinokas v. Kucerak, 2018 ONSC 4154: [29] In my view for me to apply the new provisions simply because I release my reasons after June 30, 2018, despite the fact that the even......
  • Baezner v. Brunnenmeir, 2018 ONCJ 956
    • Canada
    • Ontario Court of Justice General Division (Canada)
    • November 29, 2018
    ...prevent the court from awarding costs in relation to the step at a later stage in the case.” [38] Justice Bloom in Tsinokas v. Kucerak, 2018 ONSC 4154, addressed the issue of retrospective application of the amendments to the rules. At paragraph 28 Justice Bloom refers to a Court of Appeal ......
3 cases
  • Martin v. Martin, 2019 ONSC 920
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • February 6, 2019
    ...court has chosen not to apply Rule 24(11) retrospectively to legal services provided prior to July 1, 2018.  Tsinokas v. Kucerak, 2018 ONSC 4154 (July 6, 2018), Kang v. Kang, 2018 ONSC 4943 (August 17, 2018), Schneidermeier v. Bernosky, 2018 ONSC 7052 (November 26, [20]   ......
  • KANG v. KANG, 2018 ONSC 4943
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • August 17, 2018
    ...in any “step” in a family law proceeding regardless of whether or not costs were reserved. I agree with Bloom J. in Tsinokas v. Kucerak, 2018 ONSC 4154: [29] In my view for me to apply the new provisions simply because I release my reasons after June 30, 2018, despite the fact that the even......
  • Baezner v. Brunnenmeir, 2018 ONCJ 956
    • Canada
    • Ontario Court of Justice General Division (Canada)
    • November 29, 2018
    ...prevent the court from awarding costs in relation to the step at a later stage in the case.” [38] Justice Bloom in Tsinokas v. Kucerak, 2018 ONSC 4154, addressed the issue of retrospective application of the amendments to the rules. At paragraph 28 Justice Bloom refers to a Court of Appeal ......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT