Tsurugida v. Romero

JurisdictionBritish Columbia
CourtSupreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
JudgeKelleher, J.
Citation2006 BCSC 1754,[2006] B.C.T.C. Uned. A70
Date29 November 2006
Subject MatterFAMILY LAW

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
3 practice notes
  • MacCarthy v. MacCarthy, 2015 BCCA 496
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (British Columbia)
    • November 9, 2015
    ...order pursuant to s. 17 of the DA : see Andrews v. Andrews (1999), 50 R.F.L.(4th) 1 at para. 37 (O.N.C.A.); Tsurugida v. Romero , 2006 BCSC 1754 at para. 86. [Emphasis added.] [30] Mr. MacCarthy argues that the Chambers judge erred in this passage by confusing "... the burden upon the respo......
  • Kennett v. Kennett
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • November 22, 2021
    ...pursuant to s. 17 of the DA: see Andrews v. Andrews (1999), 50 R.F.L. (4th) 1 at para. 37 (O.N.C.A.); Tsurugida v. Romero, 2006 BCSC 1754 at [30]      Mr. MacCarthy argues that the chambers judge erred in this passage by confusing "... the burden......
  • MacCarthy v. MacCarthy
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • November 27, 2014
    ...order pursuant to s. 17 of the DA : see Andrews v. Andrews (1999), 50 R.F.L. (4th) 1 at para. 37 (O.N.C.A.); Tsurugida v. Romero , 2006 BCSC 1754 at para. 86. [109] There is an absence of any independent evidence before the Court as to what Mrs. MacCarthy reasonably could earn as a real est......
3 cases
  • MacCarthy v. MacCarthy, 2015 BCCA 496
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (British Columbia)
    • November 9, 2015
    ...order pursuant to s. 17 of the DA : see Andrews v. Andrews (1999), 50 R.F.L.(4th) 1 at para. 37 (O.N.C.A.); Tsurugida v. Romero , 2006 BCSC 1754 at para. 86. [Emphasis added.] [30] Mr. MacCarthy argues that the Chambers judge erred in this passage by confusing "... the burden upon the respo......
  • Kennett v. Kennett
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • November 22, 2021
    ...pursuant to s. 17 of the DA: see Andrews v. Andrews (1999), 50 R.F.L. (4th) 1 at para. 37 (O.N.C.A.); Tsurugida v. Romero, 2006 BCSC 1754 at [30]      Mr. MacCarthy argues that the chambers judge erred in this passage by confusing "... the burden......
  • MacCarthy v. MacCarthy
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • November 27, 2014
    ...order pursuant to s. 17 of the DA : see Andrews v. Andrews (1999), 50 R.F.L. (4th) 1 at para. 37 (O.N.C.A.); Tsurugida v. Romero , 2006 BCSC 1754 at para. 86. [109] There is an absence of any independent evidence before the Court as to what Mrs. MacCarthy reasonably could earn as a real est......