Ubah v Canadian Natural Resources Limited, 2020 ABQB 554

CourtCourt of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
JudgeAssociate Chief Justice J.D. Rooke
Citation2020 ABQB 554
Date22 September 2020
Docket Number1801 17978

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
3 practice notes
  • Fletcher v Davidson & Williams LLP, 2020 ABQB 650
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • October 26, 2020
    ...filing. The rules that apply to evaluate a leave to file application were recently reviewed in Ubah v Canadian Natural Resources Limited, 2020 ABQB 554 at paras 4-8. The relevant principle for the Fletcher 2019-20 Packets is that a leave to file application may be dismissed where the candid......
  • Ubah v Ubah, 2022 ABQB 512
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • July 27, 2022
    ...Limited, 2020 ABQB 547 - rejected ·         Ubah v Canadian Natural Resources Limited, 2020 ABQB 554 - rejected, costs ·         Ubah v Uba, 2021 ABQB 70 - granted ·    &#x......
  • Wang v Alberta, 2020 ABQB 800
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • December 18, 2020
    ...essentially the same formalistic complaint from vexatious litigant Chinedu Gideon Ubah in Ubah v Canadian Natural Resources Limited, 2020 ABQB 554 at para 27, where I concluded his complaint was “... trivial, technical, frivolous, and abusive. ...”. The same applies here. Like......
3 cases
  • Fletcher v Davidson & Williams LLP, 2020 ABQB 650
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • October 26, 2020
    ...filing. The rules that apply to evaluate a leave to file application were recently reviewed in Ubah v Canadian Natural Resources Limited, 2020 ABQB 554 at paras 4-8. The relevant principle for the Fletcher 2019-20 Packets is that a leave to file application may be dismissed where the candid......
  • Ubah v Ubah, 2022 ABQB 512
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • July 27, 2022
    ...Limited, 2020 ABQB 547 - rejected ·         Ubah v Canadian Natural Resources Limited, 2020 ABQB 554 - rejected, costs ·         Ubah v Uba, 2021 ABQB 70 - granted ·    &#x......
  • Wang v Alberta, 2020 ABQB 800
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • December 18, 2020
    ...essentially the same formalistic complaint from vexatious litigant Chinedu Gideon Ubah in Ubah v Canadian Natural Resources Limited, 2020 ABQB 554 at para 27, where I concluded his complaint was “... trivial, technical, frivolous, and abusive. ...”. The same applies here. Like......