Uhuegbulem v. Balbi
| Court | Court of King's Bench of Alberta (Canada) |
| Judge | Marion |
| Judgment Date | 26 May 2025 |
| Citation | 2025 ABKB 318 |
| Docket Number | 2401 05329 |
| Date | 26 May 2025 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
15 practice notes
-
Kostic v. Thom
...self-represented for the Application and these are not appropriate circumstances to award her costs under 10.31(5): Uhuegbulem v Balbi, 2025 ABKB 318 at para 156. Further, Kostic did not obtain the form of order she sought, the positions of those that responded to the Application were not u......
-
Piikani Nation v. Raymond James Ltd.
...involved at times)[28]. This would engage ordinary cost principles for self-represented parties, as summarized in Uhuegbulem v Balbi, 2025 ABKB 318 para [156] Historically, self-represented parties were presumptively disentitled to costs because they did not incur any legal fees......
-
NCR v. KKB
...party, costs awards promote settlement, sanction frivolous behaviour, and discourage inefficient litigation: Uhuegbulem v Balbi, 2025 ABKB 318 at para 156. [112] Awarding costs to self-represented litigants raises policy issues because self-represented litigants do not incur any legal fees,......
-
PR Construction Ltd v. Colony Management Inc
...on every issue, so the rule contemplates costs entitlement based on substantial success, objectively assessed: Uhuegbulem v Balbi, 2025 ABKB 318 at para 61; Mahe v Boulianne, 2010 ABCA 74 at para 6. Costs are not usually apportioned on a claim-by-claim basis, although there may be circumsta......
Get Started for Free
15 cases
-
Kostic v. Thom
...self-represented for the Application and these are not appropriate circumstances to award her costs under 10.31(5): Uhuegbulem v Balbi, 2025 ABKB 318 at para 156. Further, Kostic did not obtain the form of order she sought, the positions of those that responded to the Application were not u......
-
Piikani Nation v. Raymond James Ltd.
...involved at times)[28]. This would engage ordinary cost principles for self-represented parties, as summarized in Uhuegbulem v Balbi, 2025 ABKB 318 para [156] Historically, self-represented parties were presumptively disentitled to costs because they did not incur any legal fees......
-
NCR v. KKB
...party, costs awards promote settlement, sanction frivolous behaviour, and discourage inefficient litigation: Uhuegbulem v Balbi, 2025 ABKB 318 at para 156. [112] Awarding costs to self-represented litigants raises policy issues because self-represented litigants do not incur any legal fees,......
-
PR Construction Ltd v. Colony Management Inc
...on every issue, so the rule contemplates costs entitlement based on substantial success, objectively assessed: Uhuegbulem v Balbi, 2025 ABKB 318 at para 61; Mahe v Boulianne, 2010 ABCA 74 at para 6. Costs are not usually apportioned on a claim-by-claim basis, although there may be circumsta......
Get Started for Free
