Unger v. Unger Estate, 2017 BCSC 1946
Jurisdiction | British Columbia |
Judge | The Honourable Madam Justice Forth |
Citation | 2017 BCSC 1946 |
Docket Number | S154150 |
Court | Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada) |
Date | 30 October 2017 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
3 practice notes
-
Stade Estate (Re), 2017 BCSC 2354
...Act, S.B.C. 2009, c. 13, came into force on March 31, 2014: s. 186 of the Wills, Estates and Succession Act; Unger v. Unger Estate, 2017 BCSC 1946 at para. 77. In addition, the plaintiffs say that Randall and Roger ought to be removed as executors of the estate and that Sylvia's spouse, Lar......
-
Campbell Estate (Re),
...with parents transferring financial assets into the names of their adult children. At para. 84 he referred to Unger v. Unger Estate, 2017 BCSC 1946, in which Justice Forth stated at para. [57] At the time of the transfer Lorr......
-
Kolic v. Kolic, 2019 BCSC 1463
...is on Mary to establish the funds she received, either jointly or in her sole name, were a gift from Violet. In Unger v. Unger Estate, 2017 BCSC 1946, Forth J. [56] Historically when a father has transferred property to his child it was presumed that the transfer was intended as a gift. Thi......
3 cases
-
Stade Estate (Re), 2017 BCSC 2354
...Act, S.B.C. 2009, c. 13, came into force on March 31, 2014: s. 186 of the Wills, Estates and Succession Act; Unger v. Unger Estate, 2017 BCSC 1946 at para. 77. In addition, the plaintiffs say that Randall and Roger ought to be removed as executors of the estate and that Sylvia's spouse, Lar......
-
Campbell Estate (Re),
...with parents transferring financial assets into the names of their adult children. At para. 84 he referred to Unger v. Unger Estate, 2017 BCSC 1946, in which Justice Forth stated at para. [57] At the time of the transfer Lorr......
-
Kolic v. Kolic, 2019 BCSC 1463
...is on Mary to establish the funds she received, either jointly or in her sole name, were a gift from Violet. In Unger v. Unger Estate, 2017 BCSC 1946, Forth J. [56] Historically when a father has transferred property to his child it was presumed that the transfer was intended as a gift. Thi......