Update on Threats to Student Legal Clinics

Author:Doug Ferguson
Date:July 09, 2019
 
FREE EXCERPT

The past two months have seen rapid developments dramatically harming Ontario (and Canadian) student legal clinics, whose role is to help low income persons who do not have access to legal aid.

1. Legal Aid Cuts in Ontario

First, the Ontario government has taken steps to reduce access to justice for low income persons by reducing funding to Legal Aid Ontario by 30%. LAO in turn funds Ontario’s student clinics, providing the vast majority of their funding. LAO announced in mid-June that student clinics will suffer funding cuts of 10%.

Along with cuts from student fees (see below), Ontario student legal clinics are facing cuts in the area of 20%. Fewer students will be given the opportunity for experiential learning, and fewer low income persons will receive representation.

The province’s cuts will result in more self-represented persons in the court system, which in turn will cause more delays and more costs.

Studies in the US, UK, and Australia have shown that for every dollar spent on legal aid, expenses in other spending areas like health care are reduced by an average of $6.00. If this holds true in Ontario, the government will increase its overall spending and increase its deficit by making these cuts.

2. Student Fee Cuts

Second, the Ontario government is taking a second swipe at student clinics with its student fee opt-out policy. Student fees are the second largest funding source for clinics, who have been informed that they should plan for large funding cuts as a result of the policy.

Post-secondary students will now be able to opt-out of “non-essential” student fees. Student fees are paid to each university student council, which in turn uses it to fund student services, including student legal clinics. The line of thinking behind the opt-out policy is similar to an Ontarian thinking “I don’t have kids in school, so I’m going to opt out of paying education taxes.”

The Conservative Party made it clear the policy’s purpose in a fundraising email to party supporters, accusing student councils of “crazy Marxist nonsense.” What student councils in fact do is provide services to their students, not trying to establish “crazy Marxist” campuses in Ontario. What the provincial government is attempting is to weaken its potential critics.

3. Bill C-75 (again)

When Bill C-75 was introduced by the federal government in 2018, the bill raised the maximum penalty for summary conviction offences to two years. However, the bill did not amend s. 802.1...

To continue reading

FREE SIGN UP