Uppal v. Chung,

JurisdictionBritish Columbia
JudgeMacNaughton
Neutral Citation2017 BCSC 80
Subject MatterDAMAGE AWARDS,TORTS,DAMAGES,EVIDENCE
Docket NumberM130654
CourtSupreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
Date18 January 2017
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
5 practice notes
  • Uppal v. Chung, 2017 BCSC 80
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • January 18, 2017
    ...SUPREME COURT OF BRITISH COLUMBIA Citation: Uppal v. Chung,   2017 BCSC 80 Date: 20170118 Docket: M130654 Registry: Vancouver Between: Gaganjit Singh Uppal Plaintiff And Kulwinder S. Chung, Sovereign Vehicle Leasing Ltd., Seven Horses Transport Ltd., Neha Sawal, and Ashok Kumar Sawal D......
  • Janda v. Mackenzie, 2018 BCSC 168
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • February 2, 2018
    ...evidence acknowledging the reporting of those complaints in those records does not, of itself, prove them to be true: Uppal v. Chung, 2017 BCSC 80 at para. 7. But those records do demonstrate the extent to which Dr. Rickards was aware of only limited information when he carried out his inte......
  • Urwin v. Hanson, 2019 BCSC 1145
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • July 15, 2019
    ...[48] The defendant relies on the following cases in suggesting an award of $40,000 to $60,000 for non-pecuniary damages: Uppal v. Chung, 2017 BCSC 80, where the award was $40,000; Mothe v. Silva, 2015 BCSC 140, where the award was $40,000; Farbatuk v. Lagrimas, 2014 BCSC 1879, where the awa......
  • Sharma v. Day, 2020 BCSC 1365
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • September 16, 2020
    ...dealing with intangibles and hypotheticals. … [105] The approach suggested by Humphries J. in Demidas was followed in Uppal v. Chung, 2017 BCSC 80; Blenkarn v. Mills, 2016 BCSC 1976; and Chavez-Babcock v. Peerens, 2020 BCSC 863 [Chavez-Babcock]. Each of these cases involved the assessment o......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
5 cases
  • Uppal v. Chung, 2017 BCSC 80
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • January 18, 2017
    ...SUPREME COURT OF BRITISH COLUMBIA Citation: Uppal v. Chung,   2017 BCSC 80 Date: 20170118 Docket: M130654 Registry: Vancouver Between: Gaganjit Singh Uppal Plaintiff And Kulwinder S. Chung, Sovereign Vehicle Leasing Ltd., Seven Horses Transport Ltd., Neha Sawal, and Ashok Kumar Sawal D......
  • Janda v. Mackenzie, 2018 BCSC 168
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • February 2, 2018
    ...evidence acknowledging the reporting of those complaints in those records does not, of itself, prove them to be true: Uppal v. Chung, 2017 BCSC 80 at para. 7. But those records do demonstrate the extent to which Dr. Rickards was aware of only limited information when he carried out his inte......
  • Urwin v. Hanson, 2019 BCSC 1145
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • July 15, 2019
    ...[48] The defendant relies on the following cases in suggesting an award of $40,000 to $60,000 for non-pecuniary damages: Uppal v. Chung, 2017 BCSC 80, where the award was $40,000; Mothe v. Silva, 2015 BCSC 140, where the award was $40,000; Farbatuk v. Lagrimas, 2014 BCSC 1879, where the awa......
  • Sharma v. Day, 2020 BCSC 1365
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • September 16, 2020
    ...dealing with intangibles and hypotheticals. … [105] The approach suggested by Humphries J. in Demidas was followed in Uppal v. Chung, 2017 BCSC 80; Blenkarn v. Mills, 2016 BCSC 1976; and Chavez-Babcock v. Peerens, 2020 BCSC 863 [Chavez-Babcock]. Each of these cases involved the assessment o......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT