Uppal v. Chung
| Jurisdiction | British Columbia |
| Court | Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada) |
| Judge | MacNaughton |
| Neutral Citation | 2017 BCSC 80 |
| Citation | 2017 BCSC 80 |
| Date | 18 January 2017 |
| Docket Number | M130654 |
| Subject Matter | DAMAGE AWARDS,TORTS,DAMAGES,EVIDENCE |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
5 practice notes
-
Uppal v. Chung
...SUPREME COURT OF BRITISH COLUMBIA Citation: Uppal v. Chung,   2017 BCSC 80 Date: 20170118 Docket: M130654 Registry: Vancouver Between: Gaganjit Singh Uppal Plaintiff And Kulwinder S. Chung, Sovereign Vehicle Leasing Ltd., Seven Horses Transport Ltd., Neha Sawal, and Ashok Kumar Sawal D......
-
Janda v. Mackenzie
...evidence acknowledging the reporting of those complaints in those records does not, of itself, prove them to be true: Uppal v. Chung, 2017 BCSC 80 at para. 7. But those records do demonstrate the extent to which Dr. Rickards was aware of only limited information when he carried out his inte......
-
Urwin v. Hanson
...[48] The defendant relies on the following cases in suggesting an award of $40,000 to $60,000 for non-pecuniary damages: Uppal v. Chung, 2017 BCSC 80, where the award was $40,000; Mothe v. Silva, 2015 BCSC 140, where the award was $40,000; Farbatuk v. Lagrimas, 2014 BCSC 1879, where the awa......
-
Sharma v. Day
...dealing with intangibles and hypotheticals. … [105] The approach suggested by Humphries J. in Demidas was followed in Uppal v. Chung, 2017 BCSC 80; Blenkarn v. Mills, 2016 BCSC 1976; and Chavez-Babcock v. Peerens, 2020 BCSC 863 [Chavez-Babcock]. Each of these cases involved the assessment o......
Get Started for Free
5 cases
-
Uppal v. Chung
...by: 2 cases IN THE SUPREME COURT OF BRITISH COLUMBIA Citation: Uppal v. Chung, 2017 BCSC 80 Date: 20170118 Docket: M130654 Registry: Vancouver Between: Gaganjit Singh Uppal Plaintiff And Kulwinder S. Chung, Sovereign Vehicle Leasing Ltd., Seven Horses Transport Ltd., Neha Sawal, and Ashok K......
-
Janda v. Mackenzie
...evidence acknowledging the reporting of those complaints in those records does not, of itself, prove them to be true: Uppal v. Chung, 2017 BCSC 80 at para. 7. But those records do demonstrate the extent to which Dr. Rickards was aware of only limited information when he carried out his inte......
-
Sharma v. Day
...dealing with intangibles and hypotheticals. … [105] The approach suggested by Humphries J. in Demidas was followed in Uppal v. Chung, 2017 BCSC 80; Blenkarn v. Mills, 2016 BCSC 1976; and Chavez-Babcock v. Peerens, 2020 BCSC 863 [Chavez-Babcock]. Each of these cases involved the assessment o......
-
Urwin v. Hanson
...[48] The defendant relies on the following cases in suggesting an award of $40,000 to $60,000 for non-pecuniary damages: Uppal v. Chung, 2017 BCSC 80, where the award was $40,000; Mothe v. Silva, 2015 BCSC 140, where the award was $40,000; Farbatuk v. Lagrimas, 2014 BCSC 1879, where the awa......
Get Started for Free
