URM (Re), 2018 ABPC 116
| Judge | Honourable Judge L.T.L. Cook-Stanhope |
| Court | Provincial Court of Alberta (Canada) |
| Case Date | May 16, 2018 |
| Jurisdiction | Alberta |
| Citations | 2018 ABPC 116 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
2 practice notes
-
MU v Alberta (Child, Youth and Family Enhancement Act, Director),
...whether awarding private guardianship would be in the best interests of the child. [233] In URM (Re), 2018 ABPC 116, my late colleague, Cook-Stanhope, J. used a best interest analysis and found, in the circumstances, that maintaining the attachment of the child......
-
SM v Alberta (Child, Youth and Family Enhancement Act, Director), 2019 ABQB 972
...and dismissed SM’s application. The present application is an appeal by SM of that decision, which is reported as URM (Re), 2018 ABPC 116 (“Private Guardianship Decision”). [4] Bef......
2 cases
-
MU v Alberta (Child, Youth and Family Enhancement Act, Director),
...whether awarding private guardianship would be in the best interests of the child. [233] In URM (Re), 2018 ABPC 116, my late colleague, Cook-Stanhope, J. used a best interest analysis and found, in the circumstances, that maintaining the attachment of the child......
-
SM v Alberta (Child, Youth and Family Enhancement Act, Director), 2019 ABQB 972
...and dismissed SM’s application. The present application is an appeal by SM of that decision, which is reported as URM (Re), 2018 ABPC 116 (“Private Guardianship Decision”). [4] Bef......