URM (Re), 2018 ABPC 96

JudgeHonourable Judge L.T.L. Cook-Stanhope
CourtProvincial Court of Alberta (Canada)
Case DateMay 16, 2018
JurisdictionAlberta
Citations2018 ABPC 96
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
7 practice notes
  • RAB (Re), 2019 ABPC 178
    • Canada
    • Provincial Court of Alberta (Canada)
    • 17 Julio 2019
    ...Co, [1990] 2 CNLR 85; Orphan Well Association v Grant Thornton Limited, 2016 ABCA 238; R v Van der Peet, [1996] 2 SCR 507; URM (Re), 2018 ABPC 96 Counsel for the Director of Child and Family [10] Counsel for the Director of Child and Family Services did not file any written materials in res......
  • Welter v Kequahtooway and El Mulla,
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Saskatchewan (Canada)
    • 13 Febrero 2023
    ...[S.M.]. In that matter, the First Nation appealed a Provincial Court judge’s decision not to grant intervenor status (U.R.M. (Re), 2018 ABPC 96) and brought a separate application for leave to intervene in the appeal. The court confirmed that neither the provisions of the provincial ......
  • MU v Alberta (Child, Youth and Family Enhancement Act, Director),
    • Canada
    • Provincial Court of Alberta (Canada)
    • 29 Marzo 2022
    ...Although it dealt with an application for intervenor status, Alberta Justice believes that the case of URM (Re), 2018 ABPC 96 (URM (Re)) is helpful in determining the appropriate scope of an Indigenous community’s participation in child intervention proceedings.  In that case, t......
  • URM (Re), 2018 ABPC 116
    • Canada
    • Provincial Court of Alberta (Canada)
    • 16 Mayo 2018
    ...by an unsuccessful Intervenor Application brought in this case. Reasons for my denial of that Application may be found at URM (Re), 2018 ABPC 96 released [80] Fourth, SM’s counsel did not address the issue of whether it would be fair to the other litigants to grant the requested adjournment......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
7 cases
  • RAB (Re), 2019 ABPC 178
    • Canada
    • Provincial Court of Alberta (Canada)
    • 17 Julio 2019
    ...Co, [1990] 2 CNLR 85; Orphan Well Association v Grant Thornton Limited, 2016 ABCA 238; R v Van der Peet, [1996] 2 SCR 507; URM (Re), 2018 ABPC 96 Counsel for the Director of Child and Family [10] Counsel for the Director of Child and Family Services did not file any written materials in res......
  • Welter v Kequahtooway and El Mulla,
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Saskatchewan (Canada)
    • 13 Febrero 2023
    ...[S.M.]. In that matter, the First Nation appealed a Provincial Court judge’s decision not to grant intervenor status (U.R.M. (Re), 2018 ABPC 96) and brought a separate application for leave to intervene in the appeal. The court confirmed that neither the provisions of the provincial ......
  • MU v Alberta (Child, Youth and Family Enhancement Act, Director),
    • Canada
    • Provincial Court of Alberta (Canada)
    • 29 Marzo 2022
    ...Although it dealt with an application for intervenor status, Alberta Justice believes that the case of URM (Re), 2018 ABPC 96 (URM (Re)) is helpful in determining the appropriate scope of an Indigenous community’s participation in child intervention proceedings.  In that case, t......
  • SM v Alberta (Child, Youth and Family Enhancement Act, Director), 2019 ABQB 972
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • 18 Diciembre 2019
    ...for intervenor status in the Provincial Court Hearing (“Application to Intervene”). That decision is reported as URM (Re), 2018 ABPC 96 (“Intervenor Decision”). [5]               Separate from ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT