United States of America v. Shephard, (1976) 9 N.R. 215 (SCC)

JurisdictionFederal Jurisdiction (Canada)
JudgeBeetz and de Grandpré, JJ.
Citation(1976), 9 N.R. 215 (SCC),[1976] SCJ No 106 (QL),70 DLR (3d) 136,[1977] 2 SCR 1067,1976 CanLII 8 (SCC),9 NR 215,1976 CanLII 1257 (SCC),1976 CanLII 191 (SCC),[1977] 2 SCR 414,67 DLR (3d) 294,30 CCC (2d) 424,[1976] ACS no 106
CourtSupreme Court (Canada)
Date05 May 1976

USA v. Shephard (1976), 9 N.R. 215 (SCC)

MLB headnote and full text

United States of America v. Shephard

Indexed As: United States of America v. Shephard

Supreme Court of Canada

Laskin, C.J.C., Martland, Judson,

Ritchie, Spence, Pigeon, Dickson,

Beetz and de Grandpré, JJ.

May 5, 1976.

Summary:

This case arose out of an application for the extradition of an alleged fugitive to the United States of America. The application was made pursuant to the provisions of the Extradition Act. The application was based on an affidavit of an accomplice of the alleged fugitive. The accomplice had criminal charges outstanding against him which were to be withdrawn after the accomplice testified against the alleged fugitive. The affidavit clearly supported criminal charges against the alleged fugitive. The extradition judge refused to issue a warrant of committal because the evidence was tainted and "manifestly unreliable".

On appeal to the Federal Court of Appeal the appeal was dismissed and the decision of the extradition judge was affirmed - see 5 N.R. 227.

On appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada the appeal was allowed, the judgment of the Federal Court of Appeal was set aside and the case was referred back to the extradition judge for reconsideration. The Supreme Court of Canada stated that the weighing of the evidence and the determining of credibility do not form a part of the function of an extradition judge in exercising his powers under the Extradition Act - see paragraphs 16 and 25.

Laskin, C.J.C., Spence, Dickson and Beetz, JJ., dissenting, in the Supreme Court of Canada, would have dismissed the appeal and would have affirmed the decision of the Federal Court of Appeal. Spence, J., stated that the extradition judge had a statutory discretion to determine whether the evidence was of such a dubious nature as to dangerous - see paragraph 44.

Extradition - Topic 2930

Warrant of committal - Grounds for the issue of a warrant of committal - Evidence - An application for the extradition of an alleged fugitive was made based on an affidavit of an accomplice of the alleged fugitive - The affidavit clearly supported criminal charges against the alleged fugitive - The accomplice when he made the affidavit had criminal charges outstanding against him which were to be withdrawn after the prosecution of the alleged fugitive - The Supreme Court of Canada set aside a refusal by an extradition judge to issue a warrant of committal - The extradition judge stated that the evidence in support of the application was tainted and "manifestly unreliable" - The Supreme Court of Canada stated that the weighing of evidence and the determining of credibility do not form a part of the function of an extradition judge in exercising his powers under the Extradition Act - See paragraphs 16 and 25.

Criminal Law - Topic 5506

Evidence - Testimony of accomplices - Admissibility - The Supreme Court of Canada stated that the testimony of an accomplice, against whom criminal charges are outstanding is admissible and its reception will not void a conviction - See paragraphs 19 and 20.

Cases Noticed:

Commonwealth of Puerto Rico v. Hernandez, [1973] F.C. 1206, dist. [para. 5].

Re Lattimer (1906), 10 C.C.C. 244, refd to. [para. 5].

R. v. Comba, [1938] S.C.R. 396, dist. [para. 9]; folld. [para. 35].

R. v. Knox, [1968] 2 C.C.C. 348, dist. [para. 13].

R. v. Gaudet, [1971] 2 C.C.C. 418, dist. [para. 13].

R. v. Pearce (1963), 40 C.R. 75, dist. [para. 13].

R. v. Sawrenko (1971), 4 C.C.C.(2d) 33, dist. [para. 13].

Hodges case (1838) 2 Lewin 227, refd to. [paras. 13, 36].

Girvin v. The King, 45 S.C.R. 167, folld. [para. 14].

Atwood v. Robins (1788), 1 Leach 464, folld. [para. 17].

R. v. Pipe, 51 Criminal Law Reports 17, refd to. [para. 18].

R. v. Caulfield (1973), 10 C.C.C.(2d) 539, folld. [para. 19].

R. v. Williams (1975), 21 C.C.C.(2d) 1, folld. [para. 20].

Re Commonwealth of Puerto Rico and Hernandez (1973), 15 C.C.C.(2d) 56, folld. [para. 39].

R. v. Robichaud (1951), 12 C.R. 167, folld. [para. 45].

Auger v. Dubeau (1952), 111 C.C.C. 390, folld. [para. 47].

Statutes Noticed:

Extradition Act, R.S.C. 1970, c. E-21, sect. 13 [para. 30]; sect. 18(1) [para. 30].

Criminal Code of Canada, R.S.C. 1970, c. C-34, sect. 475(1) [para. 3].

Authors and Works Noticed:

Williams, Glanville, Criminal Law Review, (1965) [para. 13].

Counsel:

Louis-Phillippe Landry, Q.C., for the appellant;

David Linetsky and Sidney Leithman, for the respondent.

This appeal was heard by the Supreme Court of Canada at Ottawa, Ontario on March 17 and 18, 1976. Judgment was delivered by the Supreme Court of Canada on May 5, 1976 and the following opinions were filed:

RITCHIE, J. - see paragraphs 1 to 26.

SPENCE, J. - dissenting, see paragraphs 27 to 48.

MARTLAND, JUDSON, PIGEON and de GRANDPRE, JJ., concurred with RITCHIE, J.

LASKIN, C.J.C., DICKSON and BEETZ, JJ., concurred with SPENCE, J.

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
910 practice notes
  • R. v. Archambault,
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court (Canada)
    • November 1, 2024
    ...187; R. v. Hynes, 2001 SCC 82, [2001] 3 S.C.R. 623; Skogman v. The Queen, [1984] 2 S.C.R. 93; United States of America v. Shephard, [1977] 2 S.C.R. 1067; Dikranian v. Quebec (Attorney General), 2005 SCC 73, [2005] 3 S.C.R. 530; R. v. R.V., 2021 SCC 10, [2021] 1 S.C.R. 131; Tran v. Canada (P......
  • Froom v. Canada (Minister of Justice), (2003) 242 F.T.R. 1 (FC)
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • September 2, 2003
    ...1 S.C.R. 532; 267 N.R. 310; 145 O.A.C. 36; 152 C.C.C.(3d) 225 (S.C.C.), refd to. [para. 20]. United States of America v. Sheppard, [1977] 2 S.C.R. 1067; 9 N.R. 215, refd to. [para. 22]. Argentina (Republic) v. Mellino, [1987] 1 S.C.R. 536; 76 N.R. 51; 80 A.R. 1; 33 C.C.C.(3d) 334, refd to. ......
  • United States of America v. Kwok,
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court (Canada)
    • March 24, 2000
    ...(Que. C.A.), leave to appeal denied [1996] 3 S.C.R. xiv; 206 N.R. 316, not folld. [para. 20]. United States of America v. Shephard, [1977] 2 S.C.R. 1067; 9 N.R. 215, refd to. [para. Argentina (Republic) v. Mellino, [1987] 1 S.C.R. 536; 76 N.R. 51; 80 A.R. 1, refd to. [para. 29]. Schmidt v. ......
  • France (Republic) v. Diab,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Ontario)
    • May 15, 2014
    ...of America et al. v. Yang (2001), 149 O.A.C. 364; 56 O.R.(3d) 52 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 23]. United States of America v. Sheppard, [1977] 2 S.C.R. 1067; 9 N.R. 215, refd to. [para. United States of America v. Thomlison (2007), 219 O.A.C. 322; 84 O.R.(3d) 161; 2007 ONCA 42, leave to appeal ......
  • Get Started for Free
822 cases
  • R. v. Archambault,
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court (Canada)
    • November 1, 2024
    ...187; R. v. Hynes, 2001 SCC 82, [2001] 3 S.C.R. 623; Skogman v. The Queen, [1984] 2 S.C.R. 93; United States of America v. Shephard, [1977] 2 S.C.R. 1067; Dikranian v. Quebec (Attorney General), 2005 SCC 73, [2005] 3 S.C.R. 530; R. v. R.V., 2021 SCC 10, [2021] 1 S.C.R. 131; Tran v. Canada (P......
  • Froom v. Canada (Minister of Justice), (2003) 242 F.T.R. 1 (FC)
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • September 2, 2003
    ...1 S.C.R. 532; 267 N.R. 310; 145 O.A.C. 36; 152 C.C.C.(3d) 225 (S.C.C.), refd to. [para. 20]. United States of America v. Sheppard, [1977] 2 S.C.R. 1067; 9 N.R. 215, refd to. [para. 22]. Argentina (Republic) v. Mellino, [1987] 1 S.C.R. 536; 76 N.R. 51; 80 A.R. 1; 33 C.C.C.(3d) 334, refd to. ......
  • United States of America v. Kwok,
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court (Canada)
    • March 24, 2000
    ...(Que. C.A.), leave to appeal denied [1996] 3 S.C.R. xiv; 206 N.R. 316, not folld. [para. 20]. United States of America v. Shephard, [1977] 2 S.C.R. 1067; 9 N.R. 215, refd to. [para. Argentina (Republic) v. Mellino, [1987] 1 S.C.R. 536; 76 N.R. 51; 80 A.R. 1, refd to. [para. 29]. Schmidt v. ......
  • France (Republic) v. Diab,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Ontario)
    • May 15, 2014
    ...of America et al. v. Yang (2001), 149 O.A.C. 364; 56 O.R.(3d) 52 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 23]. United States of America v. Sheppard, [1977] 2 S.C.R. 1067; 9 N.R. 215, refd to. [para. United States of America v. Thomlison (2007), 219 O.A.C. 322; 84 O.R.(3d) 161; 2007 ONCA 42, leave to appeal ......
  • Get Started for Free
2 firm's commentaries
  • Ontario Court Of Appeal Summaries (September 17 – 21, 2018)
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • September 24, 2018
    ...Firearm, Wearing a Disguise with Intent to Commit an Indictable Offence, Directed Verdict, United States of America v. Shephard, [1977] 2 S.C.R. 1067, Criminal Code ss. 85, 344 & 351(2) v. Romano, 2018 ONCA 754 [Paciocco J.A. (Motion Judge)] Counsel: Addario and J. Foy, for the applican......
  • Patenting Diagnostic Methods In Canada: A Glimmer Of Light From Our Southern Neighbours?
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • May 15, 2019
    ...first published in © 2019 Biotechnology Focus™, December 2018/January 2019 issue (Volume 21, Number 6). Footnote 12000 2 SCR 1024. 22000 2 SCR 1067. 3 566 U.S. 66, 71, 101 USPQ2d 1961, 1965 4 573 U.S. _, 134 S. Ct. 2347, 2354, 110 USPQ2d 1976, 1980 (2014). 5 887 F.3d 117 (Fed. Cir. 2018). 6......
85 books & journal articles
  • The Trial Process
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Archive Criminal Procedure. Third Edition
    • August 29, 2016
    ...152 R v Boissoneault (1986), 16 OAC 365 (CA). 153 R v Mezzo , [1986] 1 SCR 802 [ Mezzo ]. 154 United States of America v Shephard , [1977] 2 SCR 1067 at 1080. 155 R v Charemski , [1998] 1 SCR 679 at para 3 [ Charemski ]. 156 R v MR , 2011 ONCA 190. The Trial Process 401 verdict should not b......
  • Table of cases
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Archive Fundamental Justice. Section 7 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms
    • September 8, 2012
    ...United States v Rosenau, 2010 BCCA 461 .......................................................... 275 United States v Shephard (1976), [1977] 2 SCR 1067, 70 DLR (3d) 136, [1976] SCJ No 106................................................................................. 273, 274 United State......
  • Table of cases
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books The Law of Evidence. Eighth Edition
    • June 25, 2020
    ...697 United States of America v Ferras (2006), 209 CCC (3d) 353 (SCC) .................701 United States of America v Shephard, [1977] 2 SCR 1067 .................................698 United States of America v Yousef (2003), 178 CCC (3d) 286 (Ont CA) .......... 502 United States v Rappy, 157......
  • Table of cases
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Archive Criminal Procedure. Second Edition
    • September 2, 2012
    ...275 United States of America v. Shephard (1976), [1977] 2 S.C.R.1067, 30 C.C.C. (2d) 424, [1976] S.C.J. No. 106 ........................................... 254, 356 United States v. Wilson, 421 U.S. 309 (1975) ..................................................... 388 Vancouver (City) v. War......
  • Get Started for Free