Using Section 24(1) Charter Damages to Remedy Racial Discrimination in the Criminal Justice System
Author | Gabriella Jamieson |
Position | BFA (Fordham), JD (University of Victoria), articling student with the Department of Justice, Vancouver, British Columbia |
Pages | 71-96 |
APPEALVOLUME 22
n
71
ARTICLE
USING SECTION 241 CHARTER DAMAGES
TO REMEDY RACIAL DISCRIMINATION IN
THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM
Gabriella Jamieson*
CITED: (2017) 22 Appeal 71
INTRODUCTION..................................................72
I. RACIAL DISCRIMINATION: A REAL ISSUE THAT NEEDS TO
BEREMEDIED..................................................73
A. e Nature of Racial Discrimination ................................73
B. e Extent of the Problem ........................................74
i. e Royal Commission on the Donald Marshall Jr. Prosecution ........74
ii. Recent Manifestations and Charter Violations ......................75
II. “A RIGHT, NO MATTER HOW EXPANSIVE IN THEORY, IS ONLY AS
MEANINGFUL AS THE REMEDY PROVIDED FOR ITS BREACH” .....76
A. Charter Damages: What Are ey and Can ey Remedy the Harm? .......76
B. Charter Damages Are Not a Panacea ................................78
III. WARD AND THE TEST FOR CHARTER DAMAGES ...................79
A. Introduction: Ward through the Courts ..............................79
B. e Ward Test .................................................79
C. Post-Ward: Henry ...............................................81
IV. THE CURRENTWARD TEST, APPLIED TO RACIAL DISCRIMINATION82
A. Step One: Establishing a Charter Breach .............................82
i. Which Rights Ground Charter damages? ..........................82
ii. What Proof is Required? ......................................84
iii. A Shifting Burden in the Future? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .85
iv. Other Challenges in Proving a Charter Breach rough Discrimination ..86
B. Step Two: e Functional Justication of Damages .....................86
i. Compensation..............................................87
ii. Vindication ................................................87
iii. Deterrence.................................................88
C. Step ree: Countervailing Factors..................................88
i. Alternative Remedies .........................................89
ii. Good Governance Concerns in Ward .............................90
iii. Good Governance Concerns since Ward: Chilling Eects and
TortComparisons ...........................................90
iv. e Impact on Racial Discrimination Claims.......................93
D. STEP FOUR: QUANTUM OF DAMAGES ...........................94
CONCLUSION ....................................................95
72
n
APPEALVOLUME 22
INTRODUCTION
Systemic racism is present in our cri minal justice system a nd it has wide-reaching har mful
impacts.1 e consequences of racial discrimination are severe and can include physical
and psychological ha rm, isolation, alienation, mistrust , behavioural adaptations, da mage
to family and soci al networks, and the over-incarceration of racial mi nor itie s.2
Many approaches are required to address and correct the issue of systemic racial
discrimination.3 Potential approac hes to meaningf ul change include: cu ltural competency
training rel ating to unconscious bias, implementing monitoring system s, providing more
resourcing to Gladue workers, increa sing funding for specialized c ourts, and appointing
more racially- and cultu rally-diverse judges. Without detracting f rom the importance of
these initiatives and others, this paper explores the use of damage awards pursuant to
section 24(1) of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms4as an avenue of relief for
individuals ha rmed by racial discrimination who ca nnot access other remedies available
in the crimina l trial process or tort law.
e paper addresses this topic in ve parts. Part I intro duces the systemic and his toric al
nature of racial discrimination. Part II discusses the nature of section 24(1) Charter
damages a nd why they may provide an appropriate remedy for Charter violations caused
by racial discrimination in the criminal justice system. W hile not a perfect or complete
remedy, Charter damages can provide relief to individuals who face discrimination and
can “clarify the law so as to prevent similar future breaches.”5 Part III canvasses the
seminal decision on section 24(1) damages: Vancouver (City) v Ward.6Part IV covers
the recent decision in Henry v British Columbia (AG)7and remarks on how it impacted
the test for Charter damages, with comments on Ernst v Alberta Energy Regulator.8
Part V considers how to approach a claim for C harter damages resulting from racial
discrimination.
* BFA (Fordham), JD (University of Victori a), articling student with the Depar tment of Justice,
Vancouver, British Columbia. The opini ons expressed in this article are my ow n and do not
necessarily reec t those of the Department of Jus tice or the Government of Canada. This pa per
arose out of the 2016 Criminal Law Term at the University of V ictoria, Faculty of Law. Many
thanks to CLT Professors Gerr y Ferguson and Michelle Lawrence, and my fe llow classmates for
their insightful ideas an d constant support.
1 David M . Tanovich, “The Charter of Whiteness: Twenty- Five Years of Maintaining Racial Injustice
in the Canadian Criminal Justi ce System” (2008) 40:2 Sup Ct Rev 656 at 661 [Tanovich, “Charter
ofWhiteness”].
2 Ibid.
3 Ranjan Agar wal & Joseph Marcus, “Whe re There is no Remedy, There is No Right: Usin g
CharterDamages to Compe nsate Victims of Racial Proling” (2015) 34:1 NJCL 75 at 79 [Agarwal
&Marcus].
4 Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, Part I of the Constitution Act, 1982, being Schedule B to
the Canada Act 1982 (UK), 1982, c11, s ection 24(1) [Charter].
5 Ernst v Albe rta Energy Regulator, 2017 SCC 1 at para 30, Cromwell J [Ernst].
8 Ernst, su pra note 5.
To continue reading
Request your trial