Van v. Palombi, 2015 ONSC 170
| Jurisdiction | Ontario |
| Judge | McKelvey, J. |
| Court | Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada) |
| Subject Matter | COURTS,PRACTICE |
| Citation | 2015 ONSC 170,[2015] O.A.C. Uned. 111,[2015] O.A.C. Uned. 111 (DC) |
| Date | 08 January 2015 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
2 practice notes
-
E.C. v. P.A.,
... 4. The principles applicable to a motion for leave to appeal a costs order are set out in Van v. Palombi, 2015 ONSC 170 and Eustace v. Eustace, 2017 ONSC 4814 and are as 5. Pursuant to section 133(b) of the Courts of Justice Act leave i......
-
Eustace v. Eustace, 2017 ONSC 4814
...the trial judge is entitled to deference unless the judge made an error in principle or his decision was clearly wrong: Van v. Palombi, 2015 ONSC 170, [2015] O.J. No. assessing the proper quantum of costs, the trial judge correctly considered the Respondent’s presumptive entitlement to cost......
2 cases
-
E.C. v. P.A.,
... 4. The principles applicable to a motion for leave to appeal a costs order are set out in Van v. Palombi, 2015 ONSC 170 and Eustace v. Eustace, 2017 ONSC 4814 and are as 5. Pursuant to section 133(b) of the Courts of Justice Act leave i......
-
Eustace v. Eustace, 2017 ONSC 4814
...the trial judge is entitled to deference unless the judge made an error in principle or his decision was clearly wrong: Van v. Palombi, 2015 ONSC 170, [2015] O.J. No. assessing the proper quantum of costs, the trial judge correctly considered the Respondent’s presumptive entitlement to cost......