Your World of Legal Intelligence
 Canada | +1 (343) 700 0450

Vancouver v. Picadilly Inv. Ltd., [2010] B.C.T.C. Uned. 245

Document Cited authorities 24 Cited in 3 Precedent Map Related
Vincent
JudgeKer, J.
CourtSupreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
Case DateFebruary 26, 2010
JurisdictionBritish Columbia
Citations[2010] B.C.T.C. Uned. 245;2010 BCSC 245;[2010] B.C.T.C. Uned. 245 (SC)
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
3 practice notes
  • 835637 Alberta Ltd. et al. v. Moonraker Realty Inc., (2010) 364 N.B.R.(2d) 148 (CA)
    • Canada
    • New Brunswick Court of Appeal (New Brunswick)
    • 30 June 2010
    ...(Ont.) (2005), 198 O.A.C. 201 (Div. Ct.), refd to. [para. 2]. Vancouver (City) v. Picadilly Investments Ltd., [2010] B.C.T.C. Uned. 245; 2010 BCSC 245, refd to. [para. 2]. R. v. R.E.M., [2008] 3 S.C.R. 3; 380 N.R. 47; 260 B.C.A.C. 40; 439 W.A.C. 40; 2008 SCC 51, refd to. [para. 2]. R. v. Sh......
  • R. v. Jorgensen (P.O.), [2010] A.R. Uned. 361
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • 11 May 2010
    ...law) with respect to the application of the due diligence test to facts (see for example Vancouver (City) v. Picadilly Investments Ltd. , 2010 BCSC 245, Pope & Talbot Ltd. v. British Columbia , 2009 BCSC 1715, R. v. Williams Operating Corp. , [2008] O.J. No. 3736 (Sup.Ct.Just.), R. v. H......
  • R. v. Ambrosi (D.) et al., [2012] B.C.T.C. Uned. 409 (SC)
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • 21 March 2012
    ...Kamloops area filing their reports and he has received a copy. [63] In a recent case, Vancouver (City) v. Piccadilly Investments Ltd. , 2010 BCSC 245, reference was made to R. v. Kurtzman , (1991) 4 O.R. (3rd) 417, where Tarnopolsky, J.A. said, "The due diligence defence must relate to the ......
3 cases
  • 835637 Alberta Ltd. et al. v. Moonraker Realty Inc., (2010) 364 N.B.R.(2d) 148 (CA)
    • Canada
    • New Brunswick Court of Appeal (New Brunswick)
    • 30 June 2010
    ...(Ont.) (2005), 198 O.A.C. 201 (Div. Ct.), refd to. [para. 2]. Vancouver (City) v. Picadilly Investments Ltd., [2010] B.C.T.C. Uned. 245; 2010 BCSC 245, refd to. [para. 2]. R. v. R.E.M., [2008] 3 S.C.R. 3; 380 N.R. 47; 260 B.C.A.C. 40; 439 W.A.C. 40; 2008 SCC 51, refd to. [para. 2]. R. v. Sh......
  • R. v. Jorgensen (P.O.), [2010] A.R. Uned. 361
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • 11 May 2010
    ...law) with respect to the application of the due diligence test to facts (see for example Vancouver (City) v. Picadilly Investments Ltd. , 2010 BCSC 245, Pope & Talbot Ltd. v. British Columbia , 2009 BCSC 1715, R. v. Williams Operating Corp. , [2008] O.J. No. 3736 (Sup.Ct.Just.), R. v. H......
  • R. v. Ambrosi (D.) et al., [2012] B.C.T.C. Uned. 409 (SC)
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • 21 March 2012
    ...Kamloops area filing their reports and he has received a copy. [63] In a recent case, Vancouver (City) v. Piccadilly Investments Ltd. , 2010 BCSC 245, reference was made to R. v. Kurtzman , (1991) 4 O.R. (3rd) 417, where Tarnopolsky, J.A. said, "The due diligence defence must relate to the ......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT