Vik v. Vik, 2018 BCSC 611

JurisdictionBritish Columbia
JudgeThe Honourable Mr. Justice Skolrood
Citation2018 BCSC 611
Date16 April 2018
CourtSupreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
Docket NumberE163365
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
3 practice notes
  • Segura v. Segura, 2020 BCSC 650
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • April 28, 2020
    ...to the point that she filed a notice of intention to proceed with her court action and demanded support from the payor. · Vik v. Vik, 2018 BCSC 611: the Court found that it would be unfair to the payor to order spousal support retroactive to the recipient’s initial court actions, which were......
  • N. J. D. v. J. M. K.,
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • June 14, 2021
    ...a parent’s responsibility to support their child, the legal foundation for spousal is different. As summarized in Vik v. Vik, 2018 BCSC 611 at para. [72]      While generally adopting the D.B.S. principles, Mr. Justice Cromwell, speaking for the Court, noted ......
  • B.S.D. v. S.K.D.,
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • November 29, 2021
    ...of assistance. [346]     As an example of the effect of this kind of harm on spousal support, she cites Vik v. Vik, 2018 BCSC 611, in which a finding that B. suffered a psychological illness as a result of the breakdown of the marriage that prevented her from working and......
3 cases
  • Segura v. Segura, 2020 BCSC 650
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • April 28, 2020
    ...to the point that she filed a notice of intention to proceed with her court action and demanded support from the payor. · Vik v. Vik, 2018 BCSC 611: the Court found that it would be unfair to the payor to order spousal support retroactive to the recipient’s initial court actions, which were......
  • N. J. D. v. J. M. K.,
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • June 14, 2021
    ...a parent’s responsibility to support their child, the legal foundation for spousal is different. As summarized in Vik v. Vik, 2018 BCSC 611 at para. [72]      While generally adopting the D.B.S. principles, Mr. Justice Cromwell, speaking for the Court, noted ......
  • B.S.D. v. S.K.D.,
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • November 29, 2021
    ...of assistance. [346]     As an example of the effect of this kind of harm on spousal support, she cites Vik v. Vik, 2018 BCSC 611, in which a finding that B. suffered a psychological illness as a result of the breakdown of the marriage that prevented her from working and......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT