Vik v. Vik, 2018 BCSC 611
Jurisdiction | British Columbia |
Judge | The Honourable Mr. Justice Skolrood |
Citation | 2018 BCSC 611 |
Date | 16 April 2018 |
Court | Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada) |
Docket Number | E163365 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
3 practice notes
-
Segura v. Segura, 2020 BCSC 650
...to the point that she filed a notice of intention to proceed with her court action and demanded support from the payor. · Vik v. Vik, 2018 BCSC 611: the Court found that it would be unfair to the payor to order spousal support retroactive to the recipient’s initial court actions, which were......
-
N. J. D. v. J. M. K.,
...a parent’s responsibility to support their child, the legal foundation for spousal is different. As summarized in Vik v. Vik, 2018 BCSC 611 at para. [72] While generally adopting the D.B.S. principles, Mr. Justice Cromwell, speaking for the Court, noted ......
-
B.S.D. v. S.K.D.,
...of assistance. [346] As an example of the effect of this kind of harm on spousal support, she cites Vik v. Vik, 2018 BCSC 611, in which a finding that B. suffered a psychological illness as a result of the breakdown of the marriage that prevented her from working and......
3 cases
-
Segura v. Segura, 2020 BCSC 650
...to the point that she filed a notice of intention to proceed with her court action and demanded support from the payor. · Vik v. Vik, 2018 BCSC 611: the Court found that it would be unfair to the payor to order spousal support retroactive to the recipient’s initial court actions, which were......
-
N. J. D. v. J. M. K.,
...a parent’s responsibility to support their child, the legal foundation for spousal is different. As summarized in Vik v. Vik, 2018 BCSC 611 at para. [72] While generally adopting the D.B.S. principles, Mr. Justice Cromwell, speaking for the Court, noted ......
-
B.S.D. v. S.K.D.,
...of assistance. [346] As an example of the effect of this kind of harm on spousal support, she cites Vik v. Vik, 2018 BCSC 611, in which a finding that B. suffered a psychological illness as a result of the breakdown of the marriage that prevented her from working and......