VLG v WAJ, 2020 ABQB 105
Judge | Honourable Mr. Justice Robert A. Graesser |
Citation | 2020 ABQB 105 |
Court | Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada) |
Date | 12 February 2020 |
Docket Number | 4803 137028 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
2 practice notes
-
Kuzuchar v Kuzuchar,
...RESPs are generally not considered matrimonial property but rather an asset being held in trust for children: VLG v WAJ, 2020 ABQB 105 at paras 34-37; Sorken v Sorken, 2010 CarswellAlta 2736 (Alta QB), affirmed 2011 ABCA 296. The RESPs will not be valued or shared by the parties in th......
-
Brill v Brill,
...division of matrimonial property because the value therein at that time is attributed to the Beneficiaries of that fund: see VLG v WAJ, 2020 ABQB 105 at paras 36, 37, 41, 42 and 54; see also Delorme v Delorme, 2017 ABQB 699 at paras 97 and 98. [21] &......
2 cases
-
Kuzuchar v Kuzuchar,
...RESPs are generally not considered matrimonial property but rather an asset being held in trust for children: VLG v WAJ, 2020 ABQB 105 at paras 34-37; Sorken v Sorken, 2010 CarswellAlta 2736 (Alta QB), affirmed 2011 ABCA 296. The RESPs will not be valued or shared by the parties in th......
-
Brill v Brill,
...division of matrimonial property because the value therein at that time is attributed to the Beneficiaries of that fund: see VLG v WAJ, 2020 ABQB 105 at paras 36, 37, 41, 42 and 54; see also Delorme v Delorme, 2017 ABQB 699 at paras 97 and 98. [21] &......