VLM v AJM, 2021 ABCA 267
| Judge | The Honourable Justice Frans Slatter,The Honourable Justice Brian O’Ferrall,The Honourable Justice Jo’Anne Strekaf |
| Neutral Citation | 2021 ABCA 267 |
| Citation | 2021 ABCA 267 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Alberta) |
| Date | 22 July 2021 |
| Docket Number | 2001-0222AC |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
3 practice notes
-
DC v NC, 2021 ABQB 1015
...which invite continued court applications on all matters, big and small. [207] As noted in VLM v AJM, 2021 ABCA 267, at paragraph In 2006, in Lawson v Lawson (2006), 81 OR (3d) 321, 214 OAC 94 the Ontario Court of Appeal reiterated its positi......
-
H.R.E v H.S.,
...AT, 2022 ABCA 261. The aim of maximizing parental contact is subordinate to, and determined by, the children's best interests: VLM v AJM, 2021 ABCA 267. Nevertheless, changes to parenting should only be made where there have been changes in circumstances warranting it: Gordon v. Goertz, 199......
-
VR v MO,
...the existing shared parenting arrangement demonstrates that shared parenting is not in the best interests of these children: VLM v AJM 2021 ABCA 267 at para 88 In his pre-trial brief, the father proposed that he be the primary residential parent and that the mother have 3 out of 4 weekends.......
3 cases
-
DC v NC, 2021 ABQB 1015
...which invite continued court applications on all matters, big and small. [207] As noted in VLM v AJM, 2021 ABCA 267, at paragraph In 2006, in Lawson v Lawson (2006), 81 OR (3d) 321, 214 OAC 94 the Ontario Court of Appeal reiterated its positi......
-
H.R.E v H.S.,
...AT, 2022 ABCA 261. The aim of maximizing parental contact is subordinate to, and determined by, the children's best interests: VLM v AJM, 2021 ABCA 267. Nevertheless, changes to parenting should only be made where there have been changes in circumstances warranting it: Gordon v. Goertz, 199......
-
VR v MO,
...the existing shared parenting arrangement demonstrates that shared parenting is not in the best interests of these children: VLM v AJM 2021 ABCA 267 at para 88 In his pre-trial brief, the father proposed that he be the primary residential parent and that the mother have 3 out of 4 weekends.......