VLN v SRN

JurisdictionAlberta
CourtCourt of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
JudgeHonourable Mr. Justice M. J. Lema
Citation2019 ABQB 849
Date06 November 2019
Docket Number4814 004704

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
22 practice notes
  • Form and Types of Order
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Child Support Guidelines in Canada, 2024
    • Invalid date
    ...Regan, 2011 NSSC 297. 6 Divorce Act, RSC 1985 (2d Supp), c 3, s 15.1(4). 7 Moore v Fernandes, [2001] OJ No 5192 (SCJ); compare VLN v SRN, 2019 ABQB 849. 8 Sochowski v Sochowski, 2020 ABCA 59 at para 11; Gibb v Gibb, [2005] BCJ No 2730 (SC); ZAS v 2022 BCSC 435; McConkey v McConkey, 2022 ONS......
  • Table of Cases
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Child Support Guidelines in Canada, 2024
    • Invalid date
    ...VLN v SRN, 2019 ABQB 849.................................................................................................................. 447, 650 VMH v JH, 2020 ABCA 389..............................................................................................................................
  • Chapter 8: Spousal Support on or After Divorce
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Archive Canadian Family Law (Tenth Edition)
    • April 14, 2025
    ...of the principles to be applied where interim spousal support is being sought, see Anand v Anand, 2016 ABCA 23; see also VLN v SRN, 2019 ABQB 849; Furry v Goodwin, 2020 ABCA 127. 10 McCrea v McCrea, 2018 SKQB 215 at para 4, Goebel J. See also Furry v Goodwin, 2020 ABCA 127; McConkey v McCon......
  • Form and Types of Order
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Child Support Guidelines in Canada, 2022
    • July 27, 2022
    ...v Regan, 2011 NSSC 297. Divorce Act, RSC 1985 (2d Supp), c 3, s 15.1(4). Moore v Fernandes, [2001] OJ No 5192 (SCJ); compare VLN v SRN, 2019 ABQB 849. Sochowski v Sochowski, 2020 ABCA 59 at para 11; Gibb v Gibb, [2005] BCJ No 2730 (SC); Miller v 2018 PECA 11 (interim order); CTG v RRG, 2016......
  • Get Started for Free
12 cases
  • Greco v. Calgary (City)
    • Canada
    • Court of King's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • October 31, 2025
    ...for permission to appeal and as a result is not binding on this Court (see Laser Clean Ltd v Clark, 2015 ABCA 373 at para 13; VLN v SRN, 2019 ABQB 849 at para 44), although it does contain a thorough analysis of the law on the [316] Here, there is no court order or judgment under attack. At......
  • Naubert v. Trotter
    • Canada
    • Court of King's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • May 2, 2025
    ...of advance costs is aided if the applicant provides a litigation plan and a breakdown of costs to complete that plan: see VLN v SRN, 2019 ABQB 849, Lema J at paras 68-75. That is, the applicant should identify the anticipated litigation expenses that the advance costs would Application of t......
  • Malazdrewicz v Malazdrewicz
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • November 27, 2020
    ...level of support, parties should put their efforts into resolving matters on a final basis, whether by agreement or at trial": VLN v SRN, 2019 ABQB 849 at para [28] We set aside the stated three-year duration of the interim order, to the extent that it might be viewed as precluding either p......
  • Rolinger v Rolinger
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • June 17, 2021
    ...words, this application is all about whether new interim arrangements should be made for the next handful of months. [23] In VLN v SRN, 2019 ABQB 849, I gathered various cases describing the approach to varying interim support orders (paras 17-28) and The Alberta courts have explored the va......
  • Get Started for Free
10 books & journal articles
  • Form and Types of Order
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Child Support Guidelines in Canada, 2024
    • Invalid date
    ...Regan, 2011 NSSC 297. 6 Divorce Act, RSC 1985 (2d Supp), c 3, s 15.1(4). 7 Moore v Fernandes, [2001] OJ No 5192 (SCJ); compare VLN v SRN, 2019 ABQB 849. 8 Sochowski v Sochowski, 2020 ABCA 59 at para 11; Gibb v Gibb, [2005] BCJ No 2730 (SC); ZAS v 2022 BCSC 435; McConkey v McConkey, 2022 ONS......
  • Table of Cases
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Child Support Guidelines in Canada, 2024
    • Invalid date
    ...VLN v SRN, 2019 ABQB 849.................................................................................................................. 447, 650 VMH v JH, 2020 ABCA 389..............................................................................................................................
  • Form and Types of Order
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Child Support Guidelines in Canada, 2022
    • July 27, 2022
    ...v Regan, 2011 NSSC 297. Divorce Act, RSC 1985 (2d Supp), c 3, s 15.1(4). Moore v Fernandes, [2001] OJ No 5192 (SCJ); compare VLN v SRN, 2019 ABQB 849. Sochowski v Sochowski, 2020 ABCA 59 at para 11; Gibb v Gibb, [2005] BCJ No 2730 (SC); Miller v 2018 PECA 11 (interim order); CTG v RRG, 2016......
  • Chapter 8: Spousal Support on or After Divorce
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Archive Canadian Family Law (Tenth Edition)
    • April 14, 2025
    ...of the principles to be applied where interim spousal support is being sought, see Anand v Anand, 2016 ABCA 23; see also VLN v SRN, 2019 ABQB 849; Furry v Goodwin, 2020 ABCA 127. 10 McCrea v McCrea, 2018 SKQB 215 at para 4, Goebel J. See also Furry v Goodwin, 2020 ABCA 127; McConkey v McCon......
  • Get Started for Free