VLN v SRN, 2019 ABQB 849
| Judge | Honourable Mr. Justice M. J. Lema |
| Citation | 2019 ABQB 849 |
| Docket Number | 4814 004704 |
| Court | Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada) |
| Date | 06 November 2019 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
14 practice notes
-
Evidence; Procedure; Costs
...v Armoyan, 2015 NSSC 92 applying Rule 77.02 (1) of the Nova Scotia Civil Procedure Rules. 286 [2003] 3 SCR 371. See also VLN v SRN, 2019 ABQB 849; Blaney v Murphy, 2020 ABQB 196 at para 44 (interim interdependent partner support under the Family Law Act, Alberta); Martin v Watts, 2018 ONSC ......
-
Table of Cases
...84 VLN v SRN, 2019 ABQB 849.............................................................................................................................. 433, 633 VMH v JH, 2020 ABCA 389...............................................................................................................
-
Spousal Support on or After Divorce
...of the principles to be applied where interim spousal support is being sought, see Anand v Anand, 2016 ABCA 23; see also VLN v SRN, 2019 ABQB 849; Furry v Goodwin, 2020 ABCA McCrea v McCrea, 2018 SKQB 215 at para 4, Goebel J. See also BDM v MMM, 2019 ABQB 839; Furry v Goodwin, 2020 ABCA 127......
-
Spousal Support on or after Divorce
...of the principles to be applied where interim spousal support is being sought, see Anand v Anand, 2016 ABCA 23; see also VLN v SRN, 2019 ABQB 849. McCrea v McCrea, 2018 SKQB 215 at para 4, Goebel J. See also BDM v MMM, 2019 ABQB Miller v White, 2018 PECA 11; Sane v Sane, 2015 SKQB 313, citi......
Request a trial to view additional results
9 cases
-
BDM v MMM, 2020 ABQB 288
...the Interim Order, I am exercising my discretion to vary the Interim Order and address the question of spousal support: (See VLN v SRN, 2019 ABQB 849 at paras 17-29 [VLN]). [29] Parenthetically, despite the detailed explanation and the use of expert evidence in BDM v MMM #1, BDM disputes my......
-
Malazdrewicz v Malazdrewicz,
...level of support, parties should put their efforts into resolving matters on a final basis, whether by agreement or at trial": VLN v SRN, 2019 ABQB 849 at para [28] We set aside the stated three-year duration of the interim order, to the extent that it might be viewed as precluding either p......
-
Leontowicz v. Leontowicz, 2020 ABCA 324
...level of support, parties should put their efforts into resolving matters on a final basis, whether by agreement or at trial": VLN v SRN, 2019 ABQB 849 at para [10] We agree with the mother that the chambers judge, in modifying the travel credit arrangement, did not substantively vary the p......
-
Rolinger v Rolinger,
...new interim arrangements should be made for the next handful of months. [23] In VLN v SRN, 2019 ABQB 849, I gathered various cases describing the approach to varying interim support orders (paras 17-28) and The Alberta courts have explored the varia......
Request a trial to view additional results
5 books & journal articles
-
Table of Cases
...84 VLN v SRN, 2019 ABQB 849.............................................................................................................................. 433, 633 VMH v JH, 2020 ABCA 389...............................................................................................................
-
Evidence; Procedure; Costs
...v Armoyan, 2015 NSSC 92 applying Rule 77.02 (1) of the Nova Scotia Civil Procedure Rules. 286 [2003] 3 SCR 371. See also VLN v SRN, 2019 ABQB 849; Blaney v Murphy, 2020 ABQB 196 at para 44 (interim interdependent partner support under the Family Law Act, Alberta); Martin v Watts, 2018 ONSC ......
-
Form and Types of Order
...v Regan, 2011 NSSC 297. Divorce Act, RSC 1985 (2d Supp), c 3, s 15.1(4). Moore v Fernandes, [2001] OJ No 5192 (SCJ); compare VLN v SRN, 2019 ABQB 849. Sochowski v Sochowski, 2020 ABCA 59 at para 11; Gibb v Gibb, [2005] BCJ No 2730 (SC); Miller v 2018 PECA 11 (interim order); CTG v RRG, 2016......
-
Spousal Support on or After Divorce
...of the principles to be applied where interim spousal support is being sought, see Anand v Anand, 2016 ABCA 23; see also VLN v SRN, 2019 ABQB 849; Furry v Goodwin, 2020 ABCA McCrea v McCrea, 2018 SKQB 215 at para 4, Goebel J. See also BDM v MMM, 2019 ABQB 839; Furry v Goodwin, 2020 ABCA 127......
Request a trial to view additional results