Vo v. Vo,
| Jurisdiction | British Columbia |
| Judge | Pennett, J. |
| Court | Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada) |
| Citation | [2015] B.C.T.C. Uned. 467 (SC),2015 BCSC 467,[2015] B.C.T.C. Uned. 467 |
| Date | 18 December 2014 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
9 practice notes
-
Smith v Gulka, 2020 ABQB 32
...that there was a “judicially imposed three-year limitation on retroactive child support” that begins at the time of trial); Vo v Vo, 2015 BCSC 467 at para 168 (“in D.B.S. the Court noted that an order will not usually be retroactive to a date that is more than three years prior to the date ......
-
M.T. v. J.S.,
...at paras. 30-31; McCabe v. McCabe, 2008 BCCA 187 at paras. 45-46; Schreiber v. Schreiber, 2013 BCSC 2509 at paras. 28-29; Vo v. Vo, 2015 BCSC 467 at paras. [77] The Respondent also refers to the more recent formulation of the approach to the question unde......
-
2023 BCSC 604,
...McCabe v. McCabe, 2008 BCCA 187 at paras. 45–46; Schreiber v. Schreiber, 2013 BCSC 2509 at paras. 28–29; Vo v. Vo, 2015 BCSC 467 at paras. 77 The Respondent also refers to the more recent formulation of the approach to the question under s. 3(2) in McClement v. McClement, 2017......
-
M.T. v J.S.,
...McCabe v. McCabe, 2008 BCCA 187 at paras. 45–46; Schreiber v. Schreiber, 2013 BCSC 2509 at paras. 28–29; Vo v. Vo, 2015 BCSC 467 at paras. 77 The Respondent also refers to the more recent formulation of the approach to the question under s. 3(2) in McClement v. McClement, 2017......
Get Started for Free
9 cases
-
Smith v Gulka, 2020 ABQB 32
...that there was a “judicially imposed three-year limitation on retroactive child support” that begins at the time of trial); Vo v Vo, 2015 BCSC 467 at para 168 (“in D.B.S. the Court noted that an order will not usually be retroactive to a date that is more than three years prior to the date ......
-
M.T. v. J.S.,
...at paras. 30-31; McCabe v. McCabe, 2008 BCCA 187 at paras. 45-46; Schreiber v. Schreiber, 2013 BCSC 2509 at paras. 28-29; Vo v. Vo, 2015 BCSC 467 at paras. [77] The Respondent also refers to the more recent formulation of the approach to the question unde......
-
2023 BCSC 604,
...McCabe v. McCabe, 2008 BCCA 187 at paras. 45–46; Schreiber v. Schreiber, 2013 BCSC 2509 at paras. 28–29; Vo v. Vo, 2015 BCSC 467 at paras. 77 The Respondent also refers to the more recent formulation of the approach to the question under s. 3(2) in McClement v. McClement, 2017......
-
M.T. v J.S.,
...McCabe v. McCabe, 2008 BCCA 187 at paras. 45–46; Schreiber v. Schreiber, 2013 BCSC 2509 at paras. 28–29; Vo v. Vo, 2015 BCSC 467 at paras. 77 The Respondent also refers to the more recent formulation of the approach to the question under s. 3(2) in McClement v. McClement, 2017......
Get Started for Free