O.W.L. (Orphaned Wildlife) Rehabilitation Society v. Day, 2018 BCSC 1724
| Jurisdiction | British Columbia |
| Judge | Honourable Mr. Justice Walker |
| Docket Number | S150247 |
| Court | Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada) |
| Date | 09 October 2018 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
15 practice notes
-
Stonham v Recycling Worx Inc.,
...Dental Laboratories, 2020 ABQB 738 at para 101; Underhill at paras 100-01; OWL (Orphaned Wildlife) Rehabilitation Society v Day, 2018 BCSC 1724 at para 144; Henson v Champion Feed Services Ltd, 2005 ABQB 215 at paras 34, 56; Cumberland v Maritime College of Forest Technology, 2023 NBKB 65 a......
-
Deol v. Dreyer Davison LLP, 2020 BCSC 771
...paras. 12–13; Galea v. Wal-Mart Canada Corp., 2017 ONSC 245 at paras. 254–256; O.W.L. (Orphaned Wildlife) Rehabilitation Society v. Day, 2018 BCSC 1724 at para. 286; and Avelin at paras. [128] In this case, the defendants say that because Ms. Deol’s claims of harassment are alleged to have ......
-
2023 BCSC 21,
...the dismissal: Acumen Law Corporation v. Ojanen, 2019 BCSC 1352 at para. 126; O.W.L. (Orphaned Wildlife) Rehabilitation Society v. Day, 2018 BCSC 1724 at para. 286. [193] To establish the second condition of the test, the plaintiff must prove something beyond the normal distress and hurt fe......
-
Chu v China Southern Airlines Company Ltd,
...the dismissal: Acumen Law Corporation v. Ojanen, 2019 BCSC 1352 at para. 126; O.W.L. (Orphaned Wildlife) Rehabilitation Society v. Day, 2018 BCSC 1724 at para. 286. [193] To establish the second condition of the test, the plaintiff must prove something beyond the normal distress and hurt fe......
Request a trial to view additional results
12 cases
-
Stonham v Recycling Worx Inc.,
...Dental Laboratories, 2020 ABQB 738 at para 101; Underhill at paras 100-01; OWL (Orphaned Wildlife) Rehabilitation Society v Day, 2018 BCSC 1724 at para 144; Henson v Champion Feed Services Ltd, 2005 ABQB 215 at paras 34, 56; Cumberland v Maritime College of Forest Technology, 2023 NBKB 65 a......
-
Deol v. Dreyer Davison LLP, 2020 BCSC 771
...paras. 12–13; Galea v. Wal-Mart Canada Corp., 2017 ONSC 245 at paras. 254–256; O.W.L. (Orphaned Wildlife) Rehabilitation Society v. Day, 2018 BCSC 1724 at para. 286; and Avelin at paras. [128] In this case, the defendants say that because Ms. Deol’s claims of harassment are alleged to have ......
-
2023 BCSC 21,
...the dismissal: Acumen Law Corporation v. Ojanen, 2019 BCSC 1352 at para. 126; O.W.L. (Orphaned Wildlife) Rehabilitation Society v. Day, 2018 BCSC 1724 at para. 286. [193] To establish the second condition of the test, the plaintiff must prove something beyond the normal distress and hurt fe......
-
Chu v China Southern Airlines Company Ltd,
...the dismissal: Acumen Law Corporation v. Ojanen, 2019 BCSC 1352 at para. 126; O.W.L. (Orphaned Wildlife) Rehabilitation Society v. Day, 2018 BCSC 1724 at para. 286. [193] To establish the second condition of the test, the plaintiff must prove something beyond the normal distress and hurt fe......
Request a trial to view additional results
2 firm's commentaries
-
Reason Returns To Reasonable Notice In Ontario
...notice periods creep beyond 24 months. For example, in the 2018 BC case of O.W.L. (Orphaned Wildlife) Rehabilitation Society v. Day, 2018 BCSC 1724 (O.W.L.), the BC Supreme Court held that 30 years of service in a senior position constituted exceptional circumstances to justify a 26 mon......
-
How Does Age Impact Reasonable Notice Period Assessment?
...Occupational Health and Safety Manager, was awarded 20 months notice. In O.W.L. (Orphaned Wildlife) Rehabilitation Society v. Day, 2018 BCSC 1724, the court concluded the appropriate notice period was 26 months. The court stated that the plaintiff's circumstances fell within the category of......