O.W.L. (Orphaned Wildlife) Rehabilitation Society v. Day, 2018 BCSC 1724

JurisdictionBritish Columbia
JudgeHonourable Mr. Justice Walker
Docket NumberS150247
CourtSupreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
Date09 October 2018
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
14 practice notes
  • Deol v. Dreyer Davison LLP, 2020 BCSC 771
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • May 22, 2020
    ...paras. 12–13; Galea v. Wal-Mart Canada Corp., 2017 ONSC 245 at paras. 254–256; O.W.L. (Orphaned Wildlife) Rehabilitation Society v. Day, 2018 BCSC 1724 at para. 286; and Avelin at paras. [128] In this case, the defendants say that because Ms. Deol’s claims of harassment are alleged to have ......
  • Chu v. China Southern Airlines Company Limited,
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • January 5, 2023
    ...Law Corporation v. Ojanen, 2019 BCSC 1352 at para. 126; O.W.L. (Orphaned Wildlife) Rehabilitation Society v. Day, 2018 BCSC 1724 at [193]     To establish the second condition of the test, the plaintiff must prove something beyond the normal distress and h......
  • 2023 BCSC 21,
    • Canada
    • January 1, 2023
    ...the dismissal: Acumen Law Corporation v. Ojanen, 2019 BCSC 1352 at para. 126; O.W.L. (Orphaned Wildlife) Rehabilitation Society v. Day, 2018 BCSC 1724 at para. 286. [193] To establish the second condition of the test, the plaintiff must prove something beyond the normal distress and hurt fe......
  • Chu v China Southern Airlines Company Ltd,
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • January 5, 2023
    ...the dismissal: Acumen Law Corporation v. Ojanen, 2019 BCSC 1352 at para. 126; O.W.L. (Orphaned Wildlife) Rehabilitation Society v. Day, 2018 BCSC 1724 at para. 286. [193] To establish the second condition of the test, the plaintiff must prove something beyond the normal distress and hurt fe......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
11 cases
  • Deol v. Dreyer Davison LLP, 2020 BCSC 771
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • May 22, 2020
    ...paras. 12–13; Galea v. Wal-Mart Canada Corp., 2017 ONSC 245 at paras. 254–256; O.W.L. (Orphaned Wildlife) Rehabilitation Society v. Day, 2018 BCSC 1724 at para. 286; and Avelin at paras. [128] In this case, the defendants say that because Ms. Deol’s claims of harassment are alleged to have ......
  • Chu v. China Southern Airlines Company Limited,
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • January 5, 2023
    ...Law Corporation v. Ojanen, 2019 BCSC 1352 at para. 126; O.W.L. (Orphaned Wildlife) Rehabilitation Society v. Day, 2018 BCSC 1724 at [193]     To establish the second condition of the test, the plaintiff must prove something beyond the normal distress and h......
  • 2023 BCSC 21,
    • Canada
    • January 1, 2023
    ...the dismissal: Acumen Law Corporation v. Ojanen, 2019 BCSC 1352 at para. 126; O.W.L. (Orphaned Wildlife) Rehabilitation Society v. Day, 2018 BCSC 1724 at para. 286. [193] To establish the second condition of the test, the plaintiff must prove something beyond the normal distress and hurt fe......
  • Chu v China Southern Airlines Company Ltd,
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • January 5, 2023
    ...the dismissal: Acumen Law Corporation v. Ojanen, 2019 BCSC 1352 at para. 126; O.W.L. (Orphaned Wildlife) Rehabilitation Society v. Day, 2018 BCSC 1724 at para. 286. [193] To establish the second condition of the test, the plaintiff must prove something beyond the normal distress and hurt fe......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
2 firm's commentaries
  • Reason Returns To Reasonable Notice In Ontario
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • September 20, 2019
    ...notice periods creep beyond 24 months. For example, in the 2018 BC case of O.W.L. (Orphaned Wildlife) Rehabilitation Society v. Day, 2018 BCSC 1724 (“O.W.L.”), the BC Supreme Court held that 30 years of service in a senior position constituted “exceptional circumstances” to justify a 26 mon......
  • How Does Age Impact Reasonable Notice Period Assessment?
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • September 6, 2019
    ...Occupational Health and Safety Manager, was awarded 20 months notice. In O.W.L. (Orphaned Wildlife) Rehabilitation Society v. Day, 2018 BCSC 1724, the court concluded the appropriate notice period was 26 months. The court stated that the plaintiff's circumstances fell within the category of......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT