W.L. v. N.D.H.,
Jurisdiction | New Brunswick |
Judge | Walsh, J. |
Neutral Citation | 2014 NBQB 214 |
Citation | (2014), 425 N.B.R.(2d) 305 (FD),2014 NBQB 214,425 NBR(2d) 305,(2014), 425 NBR(2d) 305 (FD),425 N.B.R.(2d) 305 |
Date | 29 August 2014 |
Court | Court of Queen's Bench of New Brunswick (Canada) |
W.L. v. N.D.H. (2014), 425 N.B.R.(2d) 305 (FD);
425 R.N.-B.(2e) 305; 1107 A.P.R. 305
MLB headnote and full text
Sommaire et texte intégral
[French language version follows English language version]
[La version française vient à la suite de la version anglaise]
.........................
Temp. Cite: [2014] N.B.R.(2d) TBEd. OC.014
Renvoi temp.: [2014] N.B.R.(2d) TBEd. OC.014
W.L. (applicant) v. N.D.H. (respondent)
(FDN-53-2014; 2014 NBQB 214; 2014 NBBR 214)
Indexed As: W.L. v. N.D.H.
Répertorié: W.L. v. N.D.H.
New Brunswick Court of Queen's Bench
Family Division
Judicial District of Miramichi
Walsh, J.
August 29, 2014.
Summary:
Résumé:
At issue was custody and access of the parties' 10 year old child and the incidental issue of child support.
The New Brunswick Court of Queen's Bench, Family Division, determined the issues.
Editor's Note: Certain names in the following case have been initialized or the case otherwise edited to prevent the disclosure of identities where required by law, publication ban, Maritime Law Book's editorial policy or otherwise.
Family Law - Topic 1881
Custody and access - Considerations in awarding custody - Welfare or best interests of child paramount - The parties had a 10 year old child - They had been separated for approximately six or seven years without any court order with respect to the child - They lived in distant parts of the province - The mother had day to day care and control and the father had regular access - At issue in this application was custody and access to the child - Both parents wanted day to day care and control - The New Brunswick Court of Queen's Bench, Family Division, granted the parents joint custody with day to day care to the mother and access to the father - It was more probable that the best interests of the child in the short term and over the long term rested in the mother remaining the primary care giver and that the place of residence of the child remain with the mother with structured access to the father - It would not disrupt the child's sense of continuity and also respected, as much as possible, her wishes - See paragraphs 4 to 27.
Family Law - Topic 1897
Custody and access - Considerations in awarding custody - Status quo - [See Family Law - Topic 1881 ].
Family Law - Topic 4045.6
Divorce - Corollary relief - Maintenance - Child support guidelines (incl. nondivorce cases) - Exceptions and exemptions - At issue was the appropriate child support of the parties' 10 year old child - The mother's income was $24,100 - The father claimed that his income was $59,664 and that his monthly budget revealed a monthly deficit of $1,486.25 - He claimed financial hardship under s. 10 of the Guidelines prevented him from paying the Guideline support of $514 - The New Brunswick Court of Queen's Bench, Family Division, denied the father's claim of financial hardship - The father's claimed income didn't take into account his new spouse's income - The court found that the father's total household income was approximately $72,863.50 - The calculations revealed that using the father's total household income and the mother's income, the father 's household would still have a higher standard of living even after paying the required child support - See paragraphs 30 to 35.
Droit de la famille - Cote 1881
Garde et accès - Facteurs considérés lors de l'attribution de la garde - Primauté du bien-être ou du meilleur intérêt de l'enfant - [Voir Family Law - Topic 1881 ].
Droit de la famille - Cote 1897
Garde et accès - Facteurs considérés lors de l'attribution de la garde - Statu quo - [Voir Family Law - Topic 1897 ].
Droit de la famille - Cote 4045.6
Divorce - Mesures accessoires - Ordonnances alimentaires - Lignes directrices sur les pensions alimentaires (y compris les cas hors-divorce) - Exceptions et exemptions (notamment difficultés excessives) - [Voir Family Law - Topic 4045.6 ].
Cases Noticed:
Gordon v. Goertz, [1996] 2 S.C.R. 27; 196 N.R. 321; 141 Sask.R. 241; 114 W.A.C. 241, refd to. [para. 5].
A.M.K.H. v. K.A.M. (2003), 259 N.B.R.(2d) 291; 681 A.P.R. 291; 2003 NBCA 33, refd to. [para. 21].
K.K. v. A.K. (2012), 394 N.B.R.(2d) 199; 1020 A.P.R. 199; 2012 NBQB 276 (Fam. Div.), refd to. [para. 25].
B.P. v. A.T. (2014), 423 N.B.R.(2d) 99; 1103 A.P.R. 99; 2014 NBCA 51, refd to. [para. 28].
Locke v. Goulding (2012), 318 Nfld. & P.E.I.R. 91; 989 A.P.R. 91; 2012 NLCA 8, refd to. [para. 30].
D.L. v. M.L. (2012), 396 N.B.R.(2d) 353; 1024 A.P.R. 353; 2012 NBQB 382 (Fam. Div.), refd to. [para. 31].
D.B.S. v. S.R.G., [2006] 2 S.C.R. 231; 351 N.R. 201; 391 A.R. 297; 377 W.A.C. 297; 2006 SCC 37, refd to. [para. 37].
Brown v. Brown (2010), 353 N.B.R.(2d) 323; 910 A.P.R. 323; 2010 NBCA 5, refd to. [para. 37].
A.N.H. v. M.K.C. (2010), 359 N.B.R.(2d) 1; 929 A.P.R. 1; 2010 NBQB 120 (Fam. Div.), refd to. [para. 45].
Authors and Works Noticed:
Payne & Payne, Child Support Guidelines in Canada (2012), pp. 17, 18 [para. 30].
Payne, Julien, Child Support Guidelines in Canada - Some Landmark Cases (2014), The Advocates Quarterly 309, p. 369 [para. 41].
Counsel:
Avocats:
Michelle Boudreau-Dumas, for the applicant;
The respondent, on his own behalf.
This application was heard on August 25 and 26, 2014, and decided on August 29, 2014, by Walsh, J., of the New Brunswick Court of Queen's Bench, Family Division, Judicial District of Miramichi, who delivered the following written decision on September 16, 2014.
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Child Support on or After Divorce
...2018 ONSC 2801 (criminal defence expenses ineligible). [2006] AJ No 642 (CA); see also Ewing v Mallette, [2009] AJ No 346 (CA); WL v NDH, 2014 NBQB 214; Soleimani v Melendez, 2019 ONSC Chapter 9: Child Support on or After Divorce • where a child is older than the provincial age of majority;......
-
Parenting Arrangements After Divorce
...No 306 (SC); Kerr v Hauer, 2010 ONSC 1995; Haider v Malach (1999), 177 Sask R 285 (CA); Chernoff v Chernoff, 2014 SKQB 139. 262 WL v NDH, 2014 NBQB 214 at paras 21–22; Dukart v Quantrill (Jones), 2015 SKCA See also CF v DF, 2017 SKQB 284. 263 Rifai v Green, 2014 ONSC 1377 at para 17, Pazara......
-
Undue hardship
...AJ No 171 (CA); Van Gool v Van Gool, [1998] BCJ No 2513 (CA); Kelly v Kelly, 2011 BCCA 173; Eckert v Eckert, 2018 MBQB 117; WL v NDH, 2014 NBQB 214; Locke v Goulding, 2012 NLCA 8; Gaetz v Gaetz, [2001] NSJ No 131 (CA); Reid v Faubert, 2019 NSCA 42; Newman v Bogan, 2010 NWTSC 69; Camirand v ......
-
Undue Hardship
...v Van Gool, [1998] BCJ No 2513 (CA); Kelly v Kelly, 2011 BCCA 173; MN v CGF, 2019 BCSC 1406; Eckert v Eckert, 2018 MBQB 117; WL v NDH, 2014 NBQB 214; Locke v Goulding, 2012 NLCA 8; Gaetz v Gaetz, [2001] NSJ No 131 (CA); Reid v Faubert, 2019 NSCA 42; Newman v Bogan, 2010 NWTSC 69; Camirand v......
-
V.-A.C. v. P.R.,
...the criterion cautioning against disrupting a child's sense of continuity, Walsh J. of this Court wrote the following in W.L. v. N.D.H . [2014] NBQB 214 at paragraph 21: I wish to return to the question of the impact of the evidence just related on E.'s sense of continuity. A child's sense ......
-
S.G.P. v. S.K.W., (2014) 431 N.B.R.(2d) 126 (FD)
...- Exceptions et exemptions (notamment difficultés excessives) - [Voir Family Law - Topic 4045.6 ]. Cases Noticed: W.L. v. N.D.H. (2014), 425 N.B.R.(2d) 305; 1107 A.P.R. 305 (Fam. Div.), refd to. [para. 27]. J.L. v. A.A. (2013), 402 N.B.R.(2d) 282; 1044 A.P.R. 282 (Fam. Div.), refd to. [para......
-
M. C. v. T. C., 2017 NBQB 50
...primary caregiver will be more detrimental to the child than reduced contact with the non-custodial parent. (at para. 12) (W.L. v. N.D.H. 2014 NBQB 214 at para [52] In this regard the mother (a teacher) explained that she holds the strong view that to the extent possible during the school w......
-
Child Support on or After Divorce
...2018 ONSC 2801 (criminal defence expenses ineligible). [2006] AJ No 642 (CA); see also Ewing v Mallette, [2009] AJ No 346 (CA); WL v NDH, 2014 NBQB 214; Soleimani v Melendez, 2019 ONSC Chapter 9: Child Support on or After Divorce • where a child is older than the provincial age of majority;......
-
Parenting Arrangements After Divorce
...No 306 (SC); Kerr v Hauer, 2010 ONSC 1995; Haider v Malach (1999), 177 Sask R 285 (CA); Chernoff v Chernoff, 2014 SKQB 139. 262 WL v NDH, 2014 NBQB 214 at paras 21–22; Dukart v Quantrill (Jones), 2015 SKCA See also CF v DF, 2017 SKQB 284. 263 Rifai v Green, 2014 ONSC 1377 at para 17, Pazara......
-
Undue hardship
...AJ No 171 (CA); Van Gool v Van Gool, [1998] BCJ No 2513 (CA); Kelly v Kelly, 2011 BCCA 173; Eckert v Eckert, 2018 MBQB 117; WL v NDH, 2014 NBQB 214; Locke v Goulding, 2012 NLCA 8; Gaetz v Gaetz, [2001] NSJ No 131 (CA); Reid v Faubert, 2019 NSCA 42; Newman v Bogan, 2010 NWTSC 69; Camirand v ......
-
Undue Hardship
...v Van Gool, [1998] BCJ No 2513 (CA); Kelly v Kelly, 2011 BCCA 173; MN v CGF, 2019 BCSC 1406; Eckert v Eckert, 2018 MBQB 117; WL v NDH, 2014 NBQB 214; Locke v Goulding, 2012 NLCA 8; Gaetz v Gaetz, [2001] NSJ No 131 (CA); Reid v Faubert, 2019 NSCA 42; Newman v Bogan, 2010 NWTSC 69; Camirand v......