Waked v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 885
| Jurisdiction | Federal Jurisdiction (Canada) |
| Court | Federal Court (Canada) |
| Citation | 2019 FC 885 |
| Date | 03 July 2019 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
2 practice notes
-
Gebreselasse v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration),
...to the Officer, the Respondent submits that the Officer’s notes should be preferred (Waked v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 885 at paras 22–23 [Waked]). [31] The Respondent argues that Mr. Gebreselasse did not meet his burden to demonstrate that he does not have......
-
Singh v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 687
...a trained officer with no vested interest in the outcome (see the summary of the case law in Waked v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 885 at para 22). [40] Furthermore, I agree with the Respondent that the Applicant’s efforts to cast doubt on the Officer’s evidence has been don......
2 cases
-
Gebreselasse v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration),
...to the Officer, the Respondent submits that the Officer’s notes should be preferred (Waked v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 885 at paras 22–23 [Waked]). [31] The Respondent argues that Mr. Gebreselasse did not meet his burden to demonstrate that he does not have......
-
Singh v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 687
...a trained officer with no vested interest in the outcome (see the summary of the case law in Waked v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 885 at para 22). [40] Furthermore, I agree with the Respondent that the Applicant’s efforts to cast doubt on the Officer’s evidence has been don......