Walchuk Estate v. Houghton, 2015 ONCA 862
| Jurisdiction | Ontario |
| Judge | Laskin, Pardu and Roberts, JJ.A. |
| Citation | 2015 ONCA 862,[2015] O.A.C. Uned. 868,[2015] O.A.C. Uned. 868 (CA) |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Ontario) |
| Subject Matter | CONTEMPT |
| Date | 09 December 2015 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
5 practice notes
-
Ontario Court Of Appeal Summaries (March 18-22, 2019)
...O.J. No. 475 (C.A.), Diversitel Communications Inc. v. Glacier Bay Inc., (2004) 181 O.A.C. 6 (Ont. C.A.), Walchuk Estate v. Houghton, 2015 ONCA 862 Berta v. Berta, 2019 ONCA 218 Keywords: Family Law, Spousal Support, Set-Off, Jurisdiction, Family Responsibility Office, Courts of Justice Act......
-
Court Of Appeal Summaries (December 6- 11)
...act in good faith without imposing the same duty on the respondents, there was no merit to this submission. Walchuk Estate v. Houghton, 2015 ONCA 862 [Laskin, Pardu and Roberts Counsel: Andrew Sheremeta, for the moving party Michael Jaeger, for the responding party Keywords: Bankruptcy and ......
-
Callidus Capital Corporation v. Opes Resources Inc., 2019 ONCA 212
...to a final determination of one of his defences. We do not agree. The starting point is to look at the order: Walchuk Estate v. Houghton, 2015 ONCA 862, at para. 12. On its face, para. 5 of the order dismisses Molyneux’s motion to compel Callidus to answer questions refused. [7] Although in......
-
2128445 Ontario Inc. v. Sherk, 2017 ONSC 5996
...right or defence that could resolve all or part of the proceedings, then the order is final [citing Walchuk Estate v. Houghton, 2015 ONCA 862.][5] [24] Mark argues that the Arrell order was final in that it determined his rights in three respects, namely:(1) It determined his entitlement to......
Request a trial to view additional results
3 cases
-
Callidus Capital Corporation v. Opes Resources Inc., 2019 ONCA 212
...to a final determination of one of his defences. We do not agree. The starting point is to look at the order: Walchuk Estate v. Houghton, 2015 ONCA 862, at para. 12. On its face, para. 5 of the order dismisses Molyneux’s motion to compel Callidus to answer questions refused. [7] Although in......
-
2128445 Ontario Inc. v. Sherk, 2017 ONSC 5996
...right or defence that could resolve all or part of the proceedings, then the order is final [citing Walchuk Estate v. Houghton, 2015 ONCA 862.][5] [24] Mark argues that the Arrell order was final in that it determined his rights in three respects, namely:(1) It determined his entitlement to......
-
Siddiqui v. Thompson, 2017 ONSC 1469
...of the parties in the litigation. [23] In support of this position, the Plaintiff points to the decision in Walchuck Estate v. Houghton (2015 ONCA 862) where the Court states (at paragraph [14] But, in some cases, to determine whether an order is truly final or interlocutory, one needs to l......
2 firm's commentaries
-
Ontario Court Of Appeal Summaries (March 18-22, 2019)
...O.J. No. 475 (C.A.), Diversitel Communications Inc. v. Glacier Bay Inc., (2004) 181 O.A.C. 6 (Ont. C.A.), Walchuk Estate v. Houghton, 2015 ONCA 862 Berta v. Berta, 2019 ONCA 218 Keywords: Family Law, Spousal Support, Set-Off, Jurisdiction, Family Responsibility Office, Courts of Justice Act......
-
Court Of Appeal Summaries (December 6- 11)
...act in good faith without imposing the same duty on the respondents, there was no merit to this submission. Walchuk Estate v. Houghton, 2015 ONCA 862 [Laskin, Pardu and Roberts Counsel: Andrew Sheremeta, for the moving party Michael Jaeger, for the responding party Keywords: Bankruptcy and ......