Walker v. Leung, 2014 BCSC 1623

JurisdictionBritish Columbia
JudgeHinkson, J.
CourtSupreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
Subject MatterDAMAGES,TORTS,PRACTICE,DAMAGE AWARDS
Date26 August 2014
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
7 practice notes
  • Leung v. Draper, 2020 BCSC 219
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • February 19, 2020
    ...[190] As found by Pearlman J. in O’Brien v. Cernovec, 2016 BCSC 1881 [O’Brien] at paras. 132-155 and Hinkson C.J. in Walker v. Leung, 2014 BCSC 1623 at para. 138-146, this type of factual scenario lends itself to the capital asset [191] There are additional negative and positive contingen......
  • Campbell v. Peter Kiewit Infrastructure Co., 2020 BCSC 805
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • May 29, 2020
    ...a case in which the plaintiff is young and his career path is uncertain. [274] The decision of Chief Justice Hinkson in Walker v. Leung, 2014 BCSC 1623 [Walker], provides an example of an assessment applying the capital asset approach: [138] The evidence thus invites an assessment of this l......
  • Riding-Brown v. Jenkins, [2015] B.C.T.C. Uned. 1751
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • September 30, 2015
    ...means of calculating his future losses. [10] The parties did not refer me to Chief Justice Hinkson's ruling in Walker v. Leung , 2014 BCSC 1623, but I consider it to be of assistance on the point: [163] The second reports were necessitated by the amendment to the discount rates which c......
  • Sidhu v. Hiebert, 2020 BCSC 418
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • March 19, 2020
    ...The plaintiff relies on Stringer v. Stringer, 2017 BCSC 1470 at paras. 152–153, and Walker v. Leung, 2014 BCSC 1623 at para. 162, in support of his argument that the Matthews Report is not an expert opinion. In my view, these cases are [53]      ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
7 cases
  • Leung v. Draper, 2020 BCSC 219
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • February 19, 2020
    ...[190] As found by Pearlman J. in O’Brien v. Cernovec, 2016 BCSC 1881 [O’Brien] at paras. 132-155 and Hinkson C.J. in Walker v. Leung, 2014 BCSC 1623 at para. 138-146, this type of factual scenario lends itself to the capital asset [191] There are additional negative and positive contingen......
  • Campbell v. Peter Kiewit Infrastructure Co., 2020 BCSC 805
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • May 29, 2020
    ...a case in which the plaintiff is young and his career path is uncertain. [274] The decision of Chief Justice Hinkson in Walker v. Leung, 2014 BCSC 1623 [Walker], provides an example of an assessment applying the capital asset approach: [138] The evidence thus invites an assessment of this l......
  • Riding-Brown v. Jenkins, [2015] B.C.T.C. Uned. 1751
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • September 30, 2015
    ...means of calculating his future losses. [10] The parties did not refer me to Chief Justice Hinkson's ruling in Walker v. Leung , 2014 BCSC 1623, but I consider it to be of assistance on the point: [163] The second reports were necessitated by the amendment to the discount rates which c......
  • Sidhu v. Hiebert, 2020 BCSC 418
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • March 19, 2020
    ...The plaintiff relies on Stringer v. Stringer, 2017 BCSC 1470 at paras. 152–153, and Walker v. Leung, 2014 BCSC 1623 at para. 162, in support of his argument that the Matthews Report is not an expert opinion. In my view, these cases are [53]      ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT