Walton v. Warren, 2020 BCSC 19

JudgeHonourable Madam Justice MacNaughton
CourtSupreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
Case DateJanuary 09, 2020
JurisdictionBritish Columbia
Citations2020 BCSC 19
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
2 practice notes
  • In The Sale Of Property Responsibility For Removal And Remediation Of Underground Storage Tanks Needs To Be Clear
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • January 20, 2020
    ...January 9, 2020, the B.C. Supreme Court in Walton v. Warren 2020 BCSC 19 found in favour of the Purchaser when an undiscovered underground storage tank required removal and site remediation following closing. This ruling was given despite the Purchaser having signed off on an inspection rep......
  • The Deal That Didn't Tank: Walton v Warren
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • March 9, 2020
    ...policy impetus for environmental remediation now sufficiently overwhelming to trump the doctrine of merger? Footnotes 1 Walton v Warren, 2020 BCSC 19 2 Ibid at para 6. 3 Ibid at paras 6, 61. 4 Ibid at para 1. 5 Ibid at para 61. 6 Hashman v Anjulin Farms Ltd, [1973] SCR 268 at para 23 [Hashm......
2 firm's commentaries
  • In The Sale Of Property Responsibility For Removal And Remediation Of Underground Storage Tanks Needs To Be Clear
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • January 20, 2020
    ...January 9, 2020, the B.C. Supreme Court in Walton v. Warren 2020 BCSC 19 found in favour of the Purchaser when an undiscovered underground storage tank required removal and site remediation following closing. This ruling was given despite the Purchaser having signed off on an inspection rep......
  • The Deal That Didn't Tank: Walton v Warren
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • March 9, 2020
    ...policy impetus for environmental remediation now sufficiently overwhelming to trump the doctrine of merger? Footnotes 1 Walton v Warren, 2020 BCSC 19 2 Ibid at para 6. 3 Ibid at paras 6, 61. 4 Ibid at para 1. 5 Ibid at para 61. 6 Hashman v Anjulin Farms Ltd, [1973] SCR 268 at para 23 [Hashm......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT