Greater Vancouver Water District v. Bilfinger Berger AG et al., 2015 BCSC 485
| Jurisdiction | British Columbia |
| Judge | Griffin, J. |
| Court | Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada) |
| Citation | 2015 BCSC 485,[2015] B.C.T.C. Uned. 485,[2015] B.C.T.C. Uned. 485 (SC) |
| Date | 31 March 2015 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
82 practice notes
-
C.K.M. v. H.R.M.,
...need to calculate law alone: Kimball v. Nikiforuk, 2019 BCSC 964 at para. 40; Greater Vancouver Water District v. Bilfinger Berger AG, 2015 BCSC 485 at para. 85. Not all cases are suitable for summary trial; suitability depends on the facts and legal issues in each case. In Inspiration Mgmt......
-
Goy v. District of Sechelt,
...[14] The first is Coast Foundation v. Currie, 2003 BCSC 1781. The others are Greater Vancouver Water District v. Bilfinger Berger AG, 2015 BCSC 485; and Ferrer v. 589557 B.C. Ltd., 2020 BCCA 83. Coast Foundation is considered in the latter two decisions, and I will turn to them [15] In Grea......
-
Malish v. 2407077 Ontario Limited,
...or when the issues are not suitable for disposition under the rule. See also Greater Vancouver Water District v. Bilfinger Berger AG, 2015 BCSC 485 at paras. 102 and Application of the Law to the Facts [27] In this summary trial Mr. Malish asks for ......
-
The Redeemed Christian Church of God v. New Westminster (City),
...Court, in Ferrer v. 589557 B.C. Ltd., 2020 BCCA 83 at para. 27, quoting from Greater Vancouver Water District v. Bilfinger Berger AG, 2015 BCSC 485 at para. 110, recently distilled a number of relevant factors that must be considered when deciding whether to determine only some of the issue......
Get Started for Free
82 cases
-
C.K.M. v. H.R.M.,
...need to calculate law alone: Kimball v. Nikiforuk, 2019 BCSC 964 at para. 40; Greater Vancouver Water District v. Bilfinger Berger AG, 2015 BCSC 485 at para. 85. Not all cases are suitable for summary trial; suitability depends on the facts and legal issues in each case. In Inspiration Mgmt......
-
Goy v. District of Sechelt,
...[14] The first is Coast Foundation v. Currie, 2003 BCSC 1781. The others are Greater Vancouver Water District v. Bilfinger Berger AG, 2015 BCSC 485; and Ferrer v. 589557 B.C. Ltd., 2020 BCCA 83. Coast Foundation is considered in the latter two decisions, and I will turn to them [15] In Grea......
-
Malish v. 2407077 Ontario Limited,
...or when the issues are not suitable for disposition under the rule. See also Greater Vancouver Water District v. Bilfinger Berger AG, 2015 BCSC 485 at paras. 102 and Application of the Law to the Facts [27] In this summary trial Mr. Malish asks for ......
-
The Redeemed Christian Church of God v. New Westminster (City),
...Court, in Ferrer v. 589557 B.C. Ltd., 2020 BCCA 83 at para. 27, quoting from Greater Vancouver Water District v. Bilfinger Berger AG, 2015 BCSC 485 at para. 110, recently distilled a number of relevant factors that must be considered when deciding whether to determine only some of the issue......
Get Started for Free