Weatherford Canada Partnership v. Addie et al., 2016 ABQB 188

CourtCourt of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
JudgeVeit, J.
Citation2016 ABQB 188
Date06 April 2016
Subject MatterPRACTICE,LIMITATION OF ACTIONS

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
8 practice notes
  • Composite Technologies Inc. v. Shawcor Ltd.
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • June 23, 2017
    ...A. Scalia & B. Garner, Reading Law: The Interpretation of Legal Texts 256 (2012). [48] See Weatherford Canada Partnership v. Addie, 2016 ABQB 188, ¶ 86 (“Weatherford cannot claim that is has been taken by surprise by Artermis’ position). [49] L. Abrams & K. McGuinness, Canadian Civi......
  • Hicke v Drefko, 2017 ABQB 795
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • December 22, 2017
    ...they “put [the party opposite] into such a position that they must be injured”: Weatherford Canada Partnership v. Addie 2016 ABQB 188, para. 62. That case noted that the amendment is to be allowed when it would “put the parties in the same position for the purposes of j......
  • Pembina Gas Services Ltd v Focus Corporation
    • Canada
    • Court of King's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • December 15, 2025
    ...the lawsuit: 681210 Alberta Ltd v Hunter, 2012 ABCA 83 at paras 31–33. 79 DPH relies on Weatherford Canada Partnership v Addie, 2016 ABQB 188, aff'd 2017 ABCA 110, leave to appeal to SCC refused, 37612 (30 November 2017) and says that just like that case, here PGS had a strategy not to add ......
  • RG Bissett Professional Corp v Kusick, 2018 ABQB 406
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • May 22, 2018
    ...and not a legal claim” was wrong (citing, M(K) v M(H), [1992] 3 SCR 6, 96 DLR (4th) 289); C.f. Weatherford Canada Partnership v Addie, 2016 ABQB 188 at paras 74-75, 2016 CarswellAlta [48] Mr. Kusick submits the Umpire properly considered the doctrine of laches in the context of the leading ......
  • Get Started for Free
8 cases
  • Composite Technologies Inc. v. Shawcor Ltd.
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • June 23, 2017
    ...A. Scalia & B. Garner, Reading Law: The Interpretation of Legal Texts 256 (2012). [48] See Weatherford Canada Partnership v. Addie, 2016 ABQB 188, ¶ 86 (“Weatherford cannot claim that is has been taken by surprise by Artermis’ position). [49] L. Abrams & K. McGuinness, Canadian Civi......
  • Hicke v Drefko, 2017 ABQB 795
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • December 22, 2017
    ...they “put [the party opposite] into such a position that they must be injured”: Weatherford Canada Partnership v. Addie 2016 ABQB 188, para. 62. That case noted that the amendment is to be allowed when it would “put the parties in the same position for the purposes of j......
  • Pembina Gas Services Ltd v Focus Corporation
    • Canada
    • Court of King's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • December 15, 2025
    ...the lawsuit: 681210 Alberta Ltd v Hunter, 2012 ABCA 83 at paras 31–33. 79 DPH relies on Weatherford Canada Partnership v Addie, 2016 ABQB 188, aff'd 2017 ABCA 110, leave to appeal to SCC refused, 37612 (30 November 2017) and says that just like that case, here PGS had a strategy not to add ......
  • RG Bissett Professional Corp v Kusick, 2018 ABQB 406
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • May 22, 2018
    ...and not a legal claim” was wrong (citing, M(K) v M(H), [1992] 3 SCR 6, 96 DLR (4th) 289); C.f. Weatherford Canada Partnership v Addie, 2016 ABQB 188 at paras 74-75, 2016 CarswellAlta [48] Mr. Kusick submits the Umpire properly considered the doctrine of laches in the context of the leading ......
  • Get Started for Free