Widmer Thrush v. Selby, 2019 MBQB 156
| Jurisdiction | Manitoba |
| Judge | MASTER PATTERSON |
| Citation | 2019 MBQB 156 |
| Date | 21 October 2019 |
| Court | Court of Queen's Bench of Manitoba (Canada) |
| Docket Number | CI 10-11-00215 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
3 practice notes
-
Esler v. Busch,
...L.R. (4th) 243). (emphasis added) [110] Citing a decision that I had previously issued in Widmer Thrush v. Selby, 2019 MBQB 156 (“Widmer”), where I had relied upon Justice Edmond’s decision in Fehr as well, Justice Thomson concluded at paragraph 20 of......
-
Bonnefoy v. Geisler, 2020 MBQB 45
...the material timeframe, and does not satisfy the requirement that a step taken was a significant advance. (See: Widmer Thrush v. Selby, 2019 MBQB 156 (CanLII), citing Fehr, [21] Having concluded that three or more years have passed without a significant advance in the action, I must, on mot......
-
Nygard International Partnership v. Canadian Broadcasting Corporation et al Nygard International Partnership v. Prowse Nygard International Partnership v. Neal, 2020 MBQB 71
...As a result, and having accepted, as was done in Fehr (supra), and in the decision of the learned master in Widmer Thrush v. Selby, 2019 MBQB 156, that the law directs that any three-year period in an action may be considered, I must apply that law to each motion on its merits, and with reg......
3 cases
-
Esler v. Busch,
...L.R. (4th) 243). (emphasis added) [110] Citing a decision that I had previously issued in Widmer Thrush v. Selby, 2019 MBQB 156 (“Widmer”), where I had relied upon Justice Edmond’s decision in Fehr as well, Justice Thomson concluded at paragraph 20 of......
-
Bonnefoy v. Geisler, 2020 MBQB 45
...the material timeframe, and does not satisfy the requirement that a step taken was a significant advance. (See: Widmer Thrush v. Selby, 2019 MBQB 156 (CanLII), citing Fehr, [21] Having concluded that three or more years have passed without a significant advance in the action, I must, on mot......
-
Nygard International Partnership v. Canadian Broadcasting Corporation et al Nygard International Partnership v. Prowse Nygard International Partnership v. Neal, 2020 MBQB 71
...As a result, and having accepted, as was done in Fehr (supra), and in the decision of the learned master in Widmer Thrush v. Selby, 2019 MBQB 156, that the law directs that any three-year period in an action may be considered, I must apply that law to each motion on its merits, and with reg......