Williams v Rosenstock
| Jurisdiction | Alberta |
| Court | Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada) |
| Judge | Honourable Madam Justice Tamara L. Friesen |
| Citation | 2020 ABQB 303 |
| Docket Number | 1103 15245 |
| Date | 04 May 2020 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
10 practice notes
-
Remington Development Corporation v Canadian Pacific Railway Company
...negotiation of the 10th Ave Agreement, and the availability of Mr. Mason as a witness to either Remington or CPR: Williams v Rosenstock, 2020 ABQB 303 at para 24. An adverse inference would also not contribute to my analysis of the evidence and findings of fact, given that I have accepted M......
-
KY v Bahler
...2011 ABQB 252, Thomas J at para 16 (“a reduced standard of care should not apply to rural medical practitioners”); Williams v Rosenstock, 2020 ABQB 303, Friesen J at para 117. Justice Germain wrote as follows in Skeels (Estate of) v Iwashkiw, 2006 ABQB 335 at paras 74, [74] .... Historicall......
-
La Trace v. Warkentin Building Movers
...68 [Mason]; Warner v Calgary Regional Health Authority (Rockyview General Hospital), 2020 ABQB 172 at para 101; Williams v Rosenstock, 2020 ABQB 303 at para 565. The requirement for professionals in the process of mitigation does not relieve the plaintiff from needing to take steps to mitig......
-
Zoerb v Saskatoon Regional Health Authority
...duty for the physician to guard against their own inexperience: Crick v Mohan (1993), 142 AR 281 (QB) at para 58; Williams v Rosenstock, 2020 ABQB 303 at para 105; Crawford v Penney, 2003 CanLII 32636 (Ont Sup Ct) at para [51] The decision as to whether to refer a patient is a matter of cli......
Get Started for Free
10 cases
-
Remington Development Corporation v Canadian Pacific Railway Company
...negotiation of the 10th Ave Agreement, and the availability of Mr. Mason as a witness to either Remington or CPR: Williams v Rosenstock, 2020 ABQB 303 at para 24. An adverse inference would also not contribute to my analysis of the evidence and findings of fact, given that I have accepted M......
-
KY v Bahler
...2011 ABQB 252, Thomas J at para 16 (“a reduced standard of care should not apply to rural medical practitioners”); Williams v Rosenstock, 2020 ABQB 303, Friesen J at para 117. Justice Germain wrote as follows in Skeels (Estate of) v Iwashkiw, 2006 ABQB 335 at paras 74, [74] .... Historicall......
-
Zoerb v Saskatoon Regional Health Authority
...duty for the physician to guard against their own inexperience: Crick v Mohan (1993), 142 AR 281 (QB) at para 58; Williams v Rosenstock, 2020 ABQB 303 at para 105; Crawford v Penney, 2003 CanLII 32636 (Ont Sup Ct) at para [51] The decision as to whether to refer a patient is a matter of cli......
-
La Trace v. Warkentin Building Movers
...68 [Mason]; Warner v Calgary Regional Health Authority (Rockyview General Hospital), 2020 ABQB 172 at para 101; Williams v Rosenstock, 2020 ABQB 303 at para 565. The requirement for professionals in the process of mitigation does not relieve the plaintiff from needing to take steps to mitig......
Get Started for Free
