Williams v Rosenstock, 2020 ABQB 303

JudgeHonourable Madam Justice Tamara L. Friesen
CourtCourt of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
Case DateMonday May 04, 2020
JurisdictionAlberta
Citations2020 ABQB 303
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
8 practice notes
  • Remington Development Corporation v Canadian Pacific Railway Company, 2022 ABKB 692
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • October 20, 2022
    ...of the 10th Ave Agreement, and the availability of Mr. Mason as a witness to either Remington or CPR: Williams v Rosenstock, 2020 ABQB 303 at para 24. An adverse inference would also not contribute to my analysis of the evidence and findings of fact, given that I have accepted Mr.......
  • KY v Bahler,
    • Canada
    • Court of King's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • May 8, 2023
    ...Thomas J at para 16 (“a reduced standard of care should not apply to rural medical practitioners”); Williams v Rosenstock, 2020 ABQB 303, Friesen J at para 117. Justice Germain wrote as follows in Skeels (Estate of) v Iwashkiw, 2006 ABQB 335 at paras 74, 76: [74] …. His......
  • Barbe v Evans, 2020 ABQB 599
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • October 9, 2020
    ...95 at para 169. [174] In terms of the Hospital Defendant, this Court recently explained the standard expected in Williams v Rosenstock, 2020 ABQB 303 at paras Nurses must exercise the care and skill that are reasonably expected of a prudent and careful nurse in similar circumstances: Wiebe ......
  • Zoerb v Saskatoon Regional Health Authority,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
    • October 5, 2022
    ...duty for the physician to guard against their own inexperience: Crick v Mohan (1993), 142 AR 281 (QB) at para 58; Williams v Rosenstock, 2020 ABQB 303 at para 105; Crawford v Penney, 2003 CanLII 32636 (Ont Sup Ct) at para [51]           The ......
  • Get Started for Free
8 cases
  • Remington Development Corporation v Canadian Pacific Railway Company, 2022 ABKB 692
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • October 20, 2022
    ...of the 10th Ave Agreement, and the availability of Mr. Mason as a witness to either Remington or CPR: Williams v Rosenstock, 2020 ABQB 303 at para 24. An adverse inference would also not contribute to my analysis of the evidence and findings of fact, given that I have accepted Mr.......
  • KY v Bahler,
    • Canada
    • Court of King's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • May 8, 2023
    ...Thomas J at para 16 (“a reduced standard of care should not apply to rural medical practitioners”); Williams v Rosenstock, 2020 ABQB 303, Friesen J at para 117. Justice Germain wrote as follows in Skeels (Estate of) v Iwashkiw, 2006 ABQB 335 at paras 74, 76: [74] …. His......
  • Barbe v Evans, 2020 ABQB 599
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • October 9, 2020
    ...95 at para 169. [174] In terms of the Hospital Defendant, this Court recently explained the standard expected in Williams v Rosenstock, 2020 ABQB 303 at paras Nurses must exercise the care and skill that are reasonably expected of a prudent and careful nurse in similar circumstances: Wiebe ......
  • Zoerb v Saskatoon Regional Health Authority,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
    • October 5, 2022
    ...duty for the physician to guard against their own inexperience: Crick v Mohan (1993), 142 AR 281 (QB) at para 58; Williams v Rosenstock, 2020 ABQB 303 at para 105; Crawford v Penney, 2003 CanLII 32636 (Ont Sup Ct) at para [51]           The ......
  • Get Started for Free

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT