Williams v Williams, 2020 ABCA 15
Judge | The Honourable Mr. Justice Peter Costigan; The Honourable Madam Justice Frederica Schutz; The Honourable Madam Justice Jo'Anne Strekaf |
Court | Court of Appeal (Alberta) |
Case Date | January 16, 2020 |
Jurisdiction | Alberta |
Citations | 2020 ABCA 15 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
7 practice notes
-
Spousal Support on or After Divorce
...the overall financial circumstances of the particular spouses. 679 2019 ABCA 159; see also SAL v BJL, 2019 ABCA 350; Williams v Williams, 2020 ABCA 15. 680 Yemchuk v Yemchuk, [2005] BCJ No 1748 (CA); Tedham v Tedham, 2005 BCCA 502; Kopelow v Warkentin, [2005] BCJ No 2412 (CA); Toth v Kun, [......
-
Spousal Support on or after Divorce
...the overall financial circumstances of the particular spouses. 675 2019 ABCA 159; see also SAL v BJL, 2019 ABCA 350; Williams v Williams, 2020 ABCA 15. 676 Yemchuk v Yemchuk, [2005] BCJ No 1748 (CA); Tedham v Tedham, 2005 BCCA 502; Kopelow v Warkentin, [2005] BCJ No 2412 (CA); Toth v Kun, [......
-
JC v KC,
...court, including solicitor-client communications or settlement discussions, without appropriate consents in place: Williams v Williams, 2020 ABCA 15 at para 22, citing Flock Estate v Flock, 2019 ABCA 194 at para 34. Further, even where there is no conflict, the lack of an independent eviden......
-
Burns v Burns,
...without consent of the other party: Bellatrix Exploration Ltd v Penn West Petroleum, 2013 ABCA 10 at para 26; Williams v Williams, 2020 ABCA 15 at para 22. Even settlement communications marked “Without Prejudice Except as to Costs”, as were some of the corresponde......
Request a trial to view additional results
5 cases
-
JC v KC,
...court, including solicitor-client communications or settlement discussions, without appropriate consents in place: Williams v Williams, 2020 ABCA 15 at para 22, citing Flock Estate v Flock, 2019 ABCA 194 at para 34. Further, even where there is no conflict, the lack of an independent eviden......
-
Burns v Burns,
...without consent of the other party: Bellatrix Exploration Ltd v Penn West Petroleum, 2013 ABCA 10 at para 26; Williams v Williams, 2020 ABCA 15 at para 22. Even settlement communications marked “Without Prejudice Except as to Costs”, as were some of the corresponde......
-
Stockall v Stockall, 2020 ABQB 229
...had occasion to review the treatment of insurance settlements for the purposes of the Matrimonial Property Act. In Williams v Williams 2020 ABCA 15, the court cited with approval the following statement of the law (at para 16) . . . [T]he intent of the Legislature under s 7(2)(d) of the Mat......
-
SZ v JZ,
...can be made that are in the best interests of the Child: See, for example CJ v Alberta (Child, Youth and Family Enhancement Act), 2020 ABCA 15 at para 14; SK v DG at paras [183] Accordingly, I appoint legal counsel for the Child (Counsel) in this matter i......
Request a trial to view additional results
2 books & journal articles
-
Spousal Support on or After Divorce
...the overall financial circumstances of the particular spouses. 679 2019 ABCA 159; see also SAL v BJL, 2019 ABCA 350; Williams v Williams, 2020 ABCA 15. 680 Yemchuk v Yemchuk, [2005] BCJ No 1748 (CA); Tedham v Tedham, 2005 BCCA 502; Kopelow v Warkentin, [2005] BCJ No 2412 (CA); Toth v Kun, [......
-
Spousal Support on or after Divorce
...the overall financial circumstances of the particular spouses. 675 2019 ABCA 159; see also SAL v BJL, 2019 ABCA 350; Williams v Williams, 2020 ABCA 15. 676 Yemchuk v Yemchuk, [2005] BCJ No 1748 (CA); Tedham v Tedham, 2005 BCCA 502; Kopelow v Warkentin, [2005] BCJ No 2412 (CA); Toth v Kun, [......