Wilson v. Wilson, (1998) 165 Sask.R. 241 (QB)
Judge | McIntyre, J. |
Court | Court of Queen's Bench of Saskatchewan (Canada) |
Case Date | April 02, 1998 |
Jurisdiction | Saskatchewan |
Citations | (1998), 165 Sask.R. 241 (QB);1998 CanLII 14060 (FCA);1998 CanLII 14060 (SK QB);[1998] 8 WWR 493;165 Sask R 241 |
Wilson v. Wilson (1998), 165 Sask.R. 241 (QB)
MLB headnote and full text
Temp. Cite: [1998] Sask.R. TBEd. AP.042
Donald Gordon Wilson (petitioner/applicant) v. June Alice Agnes Wilson (respondent/respondent)
(1989 Q.B. No. 012122)
Indexed As: Wilson v. Wilson
Saskatchewan Court of Queen's Bench
Judicial Centre of Regina
McIntyre, J.
April 2, 1998.
Summary:
Following a 1994 divorce, the father was ordered to pay $650 per month child support for each of two children. The father applied to vary child support on the ground that his present income as a farmer was substantially reduced. At issue was the calculation of the father's income for the purposes of the Federal Child Support Guidelines.
The Saskatchewan Court of Queen's Bench allowed the application and reduced child support to $494 per month per child.
Family Law - Topic 4045.5
Divorce - Corollary relief - Maintenance - Support guidelines - Calculation of income - Following a 1994 divorce, the father was ordered to pay $650 per month child support for each of two children - The father applied to vary child support on the ground that his present income as a farmer was substantially reduced - He earned $47,000 in 1994 and claimed his 1997 income was $23,415.23, as stated in his draft 1997 income tax return - The father claimed that ss. 16 and 17(1)(a) of the Guidelines should be applied to fix his income as stated in the 1997 draft return - The Saskatchewan Court of Queen's Bench held that the objective was to determine the fairest indicator of a person's income - A farmer's income fluctuated - The 1997 reduction in income reflected a drought - His 1998 income may increase - The fairest way to measure the father's income was to average the most recent three years of income information available.
Family Law - Topic 4045.5
Divorce - Corollary relief - Maintenance - Support guidelines - Calculation of income - At issue was the amount of a self-employed farmer's income for the purposes of the Federal Child Support Guidelines - For income tax purposes, the farmer was permitted to deduct capital cost allowance - The Saskatchewan Court of Queen's Bench stated that the farmer's disposable income was considerably more than his taxable income and "the calculation of expenses for the purposes of the Income Tax Act, such as capital cost allowance, reflect tax policy and not issues related to one's support obligations" - The court stated that where it was fair to do so, a portion of capital cost allowance claimed on property other than real property should be added back into income to more reasonably reflect the farmer's disposable pre-tax income - The court added back 50% of the capital cost allowance claimed on non-real property - See paragraphs 27 to 40.
Cases Noticed:
MacDonald v. Rasmussen (1997), 161 Sask.R. 103 (Q.B.), refd to. [para. 9].
Henry v. Henry, [1997] O.T.C. Uned. 655 (Gen. Div.), refd to. [para. 10].
Seiferling v. Langmaier, [1998] Sask.R. Uned. 015 (Q.B.), refd to. [para. 23].
Gorgichuk v. Gorgichuk (1997), 154 Sask.R. 273 (Fam. Div.), refd to. [para. 26].
Pyper v. Neville (1995), 132 Sask.R. 300 (Fam. Div.), refd to. [para. 26].
Doege v. Doege (1998), 162 Sask.R. 145 (Q.B.), refd to. [para. 29].
Beeler v. Beeler (1997), 161 Sask.R. 167 (Q.B.), refd to. [para. 30].
Nakonechny v. Nakonechny, [1997] Sask.R. Uned. 80 (Q.B.), refd to. [para. 31].
Jones v. Jones (1994), 122 Sask.R. 114; 4 R.F.L.(4th) 293 (Q.B.), refd to. [para. 31].
Levesque v. Levesque, [1994] 8 W.W.R. 859; 155 A.R. 26; 73 W.A.C. 26; 4 R.F.L.(4th) 375; 20 Alta. L.R.(3d) 429; 116 D.L.R.(4th) 314 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 35].
Statutes Noticed:
Divorce Act Regulations (Can.), Federal Child Support Guidelines, SOR/97-175, sect. 16, sect. 17(1), sect. 19(1)(g), sect. 19(2) [para. 8].
Federal Child Support Guidelines - see Divorce Act Regulations (Can.).
Counsel:
M.S. Scott, for Donald Gordon Wilson;
B.J. Cram, for June Alice Agnes Wilson.
This application was heard before McIntyre, J., of the Saskatchewan Court of Queen's Bench, Judicial Centre of Regina, who delivered the following judgment on April 2, 1998.
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Table of Cases
...463 Wilson v Wilson, [1998] SJ No 236, [1998] 8 WWR 493, 165 Sask R 241 (QB).......................... 131, 213, 214, 541 Wilson v Wilson, [1999] BCJ No 2458 (SC)................................................................................... 278, 284, 299, 424 Wilson v Wilson, [2004] BC......
-
Variation, Rescission, or Suspension of Child Support Orders
...Peterson v Peterson, 2011 SKQB 365. But see Chapter 11, Section I(2). Kinasewich v Kinasewich, [2000] AJ No 267 (QB); Wilson v Wilson, [1998] 8 WWR 493 (Sask Droit de la famille — 1271, [1989] RDF 592 (CS). Rivard v Rivard, [2004] AJ No 589 (QB); see also NSC v DC, 2011 NBQB 229; Francis v ......
-
Variation, rescission, or suspension of child support orders
...v Peterson, 2011 SKQB 365. But see Chapter 11, Section I(2). 41 Kinasewich v Kinasewich, [2000] AJ No 267 (QB); Wilson v Wilson, [1998] 8 WWR 493 (Sask QB). 42 Droit de la famille — 1271, [1989] RDF 592 (CS). 43 Rivard v Rivard, [2004] AJ No 589 (QB); see also NSC v DC, 2011 NBQB 229; Franc......
-
Table of cases
...443 Wilson v Wilson, [1998] SJ No 236, [1998] 8 WWR 493, 165 Sask R 241 (QB) ............................... 204, 205, 509 Wilson v Wilson, [1999] BCJ No 2458 (SC) ..................................................................................264, 269, 283, 405 Wilson v Wilson, [2004] BC......
-
NICHOLAUSON v NICHOLAUSON, 2019 SKQB 287
...source of income has been adopted in a number of cases. (See: Botha v. Botha, supra [2000 ABQB 870, 283 A.R. 201]; Wilson v. Wilson (1998), 165 Sask. R. 241 (Sask. Q.B.); Needham v. Needham (1998), 36 R.F.L. (4th) 395 (B.C. S.C. [In Chambers]); Lamb v. Lamb (1998), 166 Sask. R. 170 (Sask. Q......
-
S.K. v. R.K., (2015) 479 Sask.R. 94 (FD)
...not added back into R.K.'s income. Including 50% of the capital cost allowance in R.K.'s income, as was done in Wilson v. Wilson , (1998) 165 Sask R 241 (QB) and Dreger v. Dreger , 2000 SKQB 8, would increase R.K.'s income in 2012 and 2013 by approximately $72,000 in 2012 and $68,000 in 201......
-
Hauger v. Hauger, (2000) 268 A.R. 25 (QB)
...Wang v. Wang (1998), 110 B.C.A.C. 302; 178 W.A.C. 302; 39 R.F.L.(4th) 426 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 23, Appendix]. Wilson v. Wilson (1998), 165 Sask.R. 241 (Q.B.), refd to. [para. 29, Appendix]. Levesque v. Levesque, [1994] 8 W.W.R. 859; 155 A.R. 26; 73 W.A.C. 26; 20 Alta. L.R.(3d) 429; 4 R.F......
-
Sherlow v. Zubko, (1999) 247 A.R. 66 (QB)
...Fam. Div.), refd to. [para. 37]. Deneiko v. Deneiko (1998), 166 Sask.R. 144 (Q.B. Fam. Div.), refd to. [para. 37]. Wilson v. Wilson (1998), 165 Sask.R. 241 (Q.B.), refd to. [para. Adams v. Loov (1998), 222 A.R. 334 (Q.B.), refd to. [para. 39]. MacMinn v. MacMinn (1995), 174 A.R. 261; 102 W.......
-
Table of Cases
...463 Wilson v Wilson, [1998] SJ No 236, [1998] 8 WWR 493, 165 Sask R 241 (QB).......................... 131, 213, 214, 541 Wilson v Wilson, [1999] BCJ No 2458 (SC)................................................................................... 278, 284, 299, 424 Wilson v Wilson, [2004] BC......
-
Table of cases
...443 Wilson v Wilson, [1998] SJ No 236, [1998] 8 WWR 493, 165 Sask R 241 (QB) ............................... 204, 205, 509 Wilson v Wilson, [1999] BCJ No 2458 (SC) ..................................................................................264, 269, 283, 405 Wilson v Wilson, [2004] BC......
-
Variation, Rescission, or Suspension of Child Support Orders
...Peterson v Peterson, 2011 SKQB 365. But see Chapter 11, Section I(2). Kinasewich v Kinasewich, [2000] AJ No 267 (QB); Wilson v Wilson, [1998] 8 WWR 493 (Sask Droit de la famille — 1271, [1989] RDF 592 (CS). Rivard v Rivard, [2004] AJ No 589 (QB); see also NSC v DC, 2011 NBQB 229; Francis v ......
-
Variation, rescission, or suspension of child support orders
...v Peterson, 2011 SKQB 365. But see Chapter 11, Section I(2). 41 Kinasewich v Kinasewich, [2000] AJ No 267 (QB); Wilson v Wilson, [1998] 8 WWR 493 (Sask QB). 42 Droit de la famille — 1271, [1989] RDF 592 (CS). 43 Rivard v Rivard, [2004] AJ No 589 (QB); see also NSC v DC, 2011 NBQB 229; Franc......