Winmill v. Winmill, (1974) 5 N.R. 159 (FCA)

JudgeThurlow and Ryan, JJ., and Sheppard, D.J.
CourtFederal Court of Appeal (Canada)
Case DateJune 28, 1974
JurisdictionCanada (Federal)
Citations(1974), 5 N.R. 159 (FCA)

Winmill v. Winmill (1974), 5 N.R. 159 (FCA)

MLB headnote and full text

Winmill v. Winmill

Indexed As: Winmill v. Winmill

Federal Court of Appeal

Thurlow and Ryan, JJ., and Sheppard, D.J.

August 6, 1974.

Summary:

This headnote contains no summary.

Family Law - Topic 3504

Courts - Jurisdiction of Federal Court of Canada to hear a petition for divorce - Divorce Act, s. 2, 3, 4 and 5 - The Federal Court of Appeal held that s. 25 of the Federal Court Act was not applicable so as to give the Federal Court of Canada jurisdiction to hear divorce cases.

Cases Noticed:

Board v. Board (1919), 48 D.L.R. 13, folld. [para. 10].

Mayor of London v. Cox (1867), 2 E. & I. App. 239, folld. [para. 10].

Shuttleworth v. Seymour (1914), 28 W.L.R. 444, folld. [para. 14].

Margach v. The King, [1933] Ex.C.R. 7, folld. [para. 15].

Statutes Noticed:

Federal Court Act, S.C. 1970-71-72, c. 1, sect. 25 [para. 3].

Divorce Act, R.S.C. 1970, c. D-8, sect. 2, sect. 3, sect. 4, sect. 5 [para. 6].

Counsel:

W.M. O'Malley Forbes, for the appellant;

Lorne A. Montaine, for the respondent.

This appeal was heard by the Federal Court of Appeal at Vancouver, B.C., on June 28, 1974. Judgment was delivered by the Federal Court of Appeal on August 6, 1974 and the following opinions were filed:

THURLOW, J. - see paragraphs 1 to 11.

SHEPPARD, D.J. - see paragraphs 12 to 17.

RYAN, J., concurred with THURLOW, J.

To continue reading

Request your trial
4 practice notes
  • Canadian Human Rights Commission v. Canadian Liberty Net et al., (1996) 192 N.R. 298 (FCA)
    • Canada
    • Canada (Federal) Federal Court of Appeal (Canada)
    • 25 Enero 1996
    ...Human Rights Commission, [1990] 3 S.C.R. 892; 117 N.R. 191; 75 D.L.R.(4th) 577, consd. [para. 18]. Winmill v. Winmill, [1974] F.C. 686; 5 N.R. 159 (F.C.A.), consd. [para. Saskatchewan Wheat Pool v. Canada, [1983] 1 S.C.R. 205; 45 N.R. 425; 143 D.L.R.(3d) 9, refd to. [para. 24]. Bhadauria v.......
  • Thurber v. Thurber, (2002) 322 A.R. 242 (QB)
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • 2 Agosto 2002
    ...- The Alberta Court of Queen's Bench rejected the argument - See paragraphs 23 to 29. Cases Noticed: Winmill v. Winmill, [1974] 1 F.C. 686; 5 N.R. 159 (F.C.A.), refd to. [para. 5]. Jadavji v. Jadavji, [2001] B.C.T.C. 767 (S.C. Master), affd. [2001] B.C.T.C. 1027 (S.C.), refd to. [para. 5]. ......
  • Creighton v. Franko et al., (1998) 151 F.T.R. 21 (TD)
    • Canada
    • Canada (Federal) Federal Court (Canada)
    • 26 Junio 1998
    ...Baptiste et al. (1997), 118 F.T.R. 258 (T.D.), refd to. [para. 25]. Winmill v. Winmill, [1974] 1 F.C. 539 (T.D.), affd., [1974] 1 F.C. 686; 5 N.R. 159 (F.C.A.), refd to. [para. Creighton v. Saskatoon Credit Union Ltd. (1994), 72 F.T.R. 78 (T.D.), refd to. [para. 27]. Moyer v. Polsin (1992),......
  • Jadavji v. Jadavji,
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • 19 Abril 2001
    ...paragraphs 1 to 13. Cases Noticed: MacPherson v. MacPherson (1976), 28 R.F.L. 106 (Ont. C.A.), refd to. [para. 8]. Winmill v. Winmill (1974), 5 N.R. 159; 47 D.L.R.(3d) 597 (F.C.A.), refd to. [para. Statutes Noticed: Divorce Act, R.S.C. 1985 (2nd Supp.), c. 3, sect. 3(1) [para. 2]. Counsel: ......
4 cases
  • Canadian Human Rights Commission v. Canadian Liberty Net et al., (1996) 192 N.R. 298 (FCA)
    • Canada
    • Canada (Federal) Federal Court of Appeal (Canada)
    • 25 Enero 1996
    ...Human Rights Commission, [1990] 3 S.C.R. 892; 117 N.R. 191; 75 D.L.R.(4th) 577, consd. [para. 18]. Winmill v. Winmill, [1974] F.C. 686; 5 N.R. 159 (F.C.A.), consd. [para. Saskatchewan Wheat Pool v. Canada, [1983] 1 S.C.R. 205; 45 N.R. 425; 143 D.L.R.(3d) 9, refd to. [para. 24]. Bhadauria v.......
  • Thurber v. Thurber, (2002) 322 A.R. 242 (QB)
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • 2 Agosto 2002
    ...- The Alberta Court of Queen's Bench rejected the argument - See paragraphs 23 to 29. Cases Noticed: Winmill v. Winmill, [1974] 1 F.C. 686; 5 N.R. 159 (F.C.A.), refd to. [para. 5]. Jadavji v. Jadavji, [2001] B.C.T.C. 767 (S.C. Master), affd. [2001] B.C.T.C. 1027 (S.C.), refd to. [para. 5]. ......
  • Creighton v. Franko et al., (1998) 151 F.T.R. 21 (TD)
    • Canada
    • Canada (Federal) Federal Court (Canada)
    • 26 Junio 1998
    ...Baptiste et al. (1997), 118 F.T.R. 258 (T.D.), refd to. [para. 25]. Winmill v. Winmill, [1974] 1 F.C. 539 (T.D.), affd., [1974] 1 F.C. 686; 5 N.R. 159 (F.C.A.), refd to. [para. Creighton v. Saskatoon Credit Union Ltd. (1994), 72 F.T.R. 78 (T.D.), refd to. [para. 27]. Moyer v. Polsin (1992),......
  • Jadavji v. Jadavji,
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • 19 Abril 2001
    ...paragraphs 1 to 13. Cases Noticed: MacPherson v. MacPherson (1976), 28 R.F.L. 106 (Ont. C.A.), refd to. [para. 8]. Winmill v. Winmill (1974), 5 N.R. 159; 47 D.L.R.(3d) 597 (F.C.A.), refd to. [para. Statutes Noticed: Divorce Act, R.S.C. 1985 (2nd Supp.), c. 3, sect. 3(1) [para. 2]. Counsel: ......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT