Winmill v. Winmill, (1974) 5 N.R. 159 (FCA)
Judge | Thurlow and Ryan, JJ., and Sheppard, D.J. |
Court | Federal Court of Appeal (Canada) |
Case Date | June 28, 1974 |
Jurisdiction | Canada (Federal) |
Citations | (1974), 5 N.R. 159 (FCA) |
Winmill v. Winmill (1974), 5 N.R. 159 (FCA)
MLB headnote and full text
Winmill v. Winmill
Indexed As: Winmill v. Winmill
Federal Court of Appeal
Thurlow and Ryan, JJ., and Sheppard, D.J.
August 6, 1974.
Summary:
This headnote contains no summary.
Family Law - Topic 3504
Courts - Jurisdiction of Federal Court of Canada to hear a petition for divorce - Divorce Act, s. 2, 3, 4 and 5 - The Federal Court of Appeal held that s. 25 of the Federal Court Act was not applicable so as to give the Federal Court of Canada jurisdiction to hear divorce cases.
Cases Noticed:
Board v. Board (1919), 48 D.L.R. 13, folld. [para. 10].
Mayor of London v. Cox (1867), 2 E. & I. App. 239, folld. [para. 10].
Shuttleworth v. Seymour (1914), 28 W.L.R. 444, folld. [para. 14].
Margach v. The King, [1933] Ex.C.R. 7, folld. [para. 15].
Statutes Noticed:
Federal Court Act, S.C. 1970-71-72, c. 1, sect. 25 [para. 3].
Divorce Act, R.S.C. 1970, c. D-8, sect. 2, sect. 3, sect. 4, sect. 5 [para. 6].
Counsel:
W.M. O'Malley Forbes, for the appellant;
Lorne A. Montaine, for the respondent.
This appeal was heard by the Federal Court of Appeal at Vancouver, B.C., on June 28, 1974. Judgment was delivered by the Federal Court of Appeal on August 6, 1974 and the following opinions were filed:
THURLOW, J. - see paragraphs 1 to 11.
SHEPPARD, D.J. - see paragraphs 12 to 17.
RYAN, J., concurred with THURLOW, J.
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Canadian Human Rights Commission v. Canadian Liberty Net et al., (1996) 192 N.R. 298 (FCA)
...Human Rights Commission, [1990] 3 S.C.R. 892; 117 N.R. 191; 75 D.L.R.(4th) 577, consd. [para. 18]. Winmill v. Winmill, [1974] F.C. 686; 5 N.R. 159 (F.C.A.), consd. [para. Saskatchewan Wheat Pool v. Canada, [1983] 1 S.C.R. 205; 45 N.R. 425; 143 D.L.R.(3d) 9, refd to. [para. 24]. Bhadauria v.......
-
Thurber v. Thurber, (2002) 322 A.R. 242 (QB)
...- The Alberta Court of Queen's Bench rejected the argument - See paragraphs 23 to 29. Cases Noticed: Winmill v. Winmill, [1974] 1 F.C. 686; 5 N.R. 159 (F.C.A.), refd to. [para. 5]. Jadavji v. Jadavji, [2001] B.C.T.C. 767 (S.C. Master), affd. [2001] B.C.T.C. 1027 (S.C.), refd to. [para. 5]. ......
-
Creighton v. Franko et al., (1998) 151 F.T.R. 21 (TD)
...Baptiste et al. (1997), 118 F.T.R. 258 (T.D.), refd to. [para. 25]. Winmill v. Winmill, [1974] 1 F.C. 539 (T.D.), affd., [1974] 1 F.C. 686; 5 N.R. 159 (F.C.A.), refd to. [para. Creighton v. Saskatoon Credit Union Ltd. (1994), 72 F.T.R. 78 (T.D.), refd to. [para. 27]. Moyer v. Polsin (1992),......
-
Jadavji v. Jadavji,
...paragraphs 1 to 13. Cases Noticed: MacPherson v. MacPherson (1976), 28 R.F.L. 106 (Ont. C.A.), refd to. [para. 8]. Winmill v. Winmill (1974), 5 N.R. 159; 47 D.L.R.(3d) 597 (F.C.A.), refd to. [para. Statutes Noticed: Divorce Act, R.S.C. 1985 (2nd Supp.), c. 3, sect. 3(1) [para. 2]. Counsel: ......
-
Canadian Human Rights Commission v. Canadian Liberty Net et al., (1996) 192 N.R. 298 (FCA)
...Human Rights Commission, [1990] 3 S.C.R. 892; 117 N.R. 191; 75 D.L.R.(4th) 577, consd. [para. 18]. Winmill v. Winmill, [1974] F.C. 686; 5 N.R. 159 (F.C.A.), consd. [para. Saskatchewan Wheat Pool v. Canada, [1983] 1 S.C.R. 205; 45 N.R. 425; 143 D.L.R.(3d) 9, refd to. [para. 24]. Bhadauria v.......
-
Thurber v. Thurber, (2002) 322 A.R. 242 (QB)
...- The Alberta Court of Queen's Bench rejected the argument - See paragraphs 23 to 29. Cases Noticed: Winmill v. Winmill, [1974] 1 F.C. 686; 5 N.R. 159 (F.C.A.), refd to. [para. 5]. Jadavji v. Jadavji, [2001] B.C.T.C. 767 (S.C. Master), affd. [2001] B.C.T.C. 1027 (S.C.), refd to. [para. 5]. ......
-
Creighton v. Franko et al., (1998) 151 F.T.R. 21 (TD)
...Baptiste et al. (1997), 118 F.T.R. 258 (T.D.), refd to. [para. 25]. Winmill v. Winmill, [1974] 1 F.C. 539 (T.D.), affd., [1974] 1 F.C. 686; 5 N.R. 159 (F.C.A.), refd to. [para. Creighton v. Saskatoon Credit Union Ltd. (1994), 72 F.T.R. 78 (T.D.), refd to. [para. 27]. Moyer v. Polsin (1992),......
-
Jadavji v. Jadavji,
...paragraphs 1 to 13. Cases Noticed: MacPherson v. MacPherson (1976), 28 R.F.L. 106 (Ont. C.A.), refd to. [para. 8]. Winmill v. Winmill (1974), 5 N.R. 159; 47 D.L.R.(3d) 597 (F.C.A.), refd to. [para. Statutes Noticed: Divorce Act, R.S.C. 1985 (2nd Supp.), c. 3, sect. 3(1) [para. 2]. Counsel: ......