Winnipeg (City) v. Caspian Projects Inc. et al., 2020 MBQB 131

JurisdictionManitoba
JudgeJOYAL C.J.Q.B.
Citation2020 MBQB 131
Date15 September 2020
CourtCourt of Queen's Bench of Manitoba (Canada)
Docket NumberCI 20-01-25295 (Winnipeg Centre)
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
2 practice notes
  • Springs of Living Water Centre Inc. v. The Government of Manitoba,
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Manitoba (Canada)
    • December 5, 2020
    ...of irreparable harm must be clear and not speculative. It cannot be presumed. (See Winnipeg (City) v. Caspian Projects Inc. et al., 2020 MBQB 131, at paragraph 27; Oberg et al. v. Canada (A.G.), 2012 MBQB 64, at paragraphs 32 - 33, 36 - 60; Sapotaweyak Cree Nation et al. v. Manitoba et al.,......
  • 7602678 Manitoba Ltd. v. 6399500 Manitoba Ltd.,
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Manitoba (Canada)
    • January 24, 2022
    ...of the test as succinctly set forth recently by the Honourable Chief Justice Joyal in Winnipeg (City) v. Caspian Projects Inc. et al., 2020 MBQB 131.  The issue of costs was adjourned pending determination of the First 639 PLAINTIFFS’ APPEAL DISMISSED [27]    ......
2 cases
  • Springs of Living Water Centre Inc. v. The Government of Manitoba,
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Manitoba (Canada)
    • December 5, 2020
    ...of irreparable harm must be clear and not speculative. It cannot be presumed. (See Winnipeg (City) v. Caspian Projects Inc. et al., 2020 MBQB 131, at paragraph 27; Oberg et al. v. Canada (A.G.), 2012 MBQB 64, at paragraphs 32 - 33, 36 - 60; Sapotaweyak Cree Nation et al. v. Manitoba et al.,......
  • 7602678 Manitoba Ltd. v. 6399500 Manitoba Ltd.,
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Manitoba (Canada)
    • January 24, 2022
    ...of the test as succinctly set forth recently by the Honourable Chief Justice Joyal in Winnipeg (City) v. Caspian Projects Inc. et al., 2020 MBQB 131.  The issue of costs was adjourned pending determination of the First 639 PLAINTIFFS’ APPEAL DISMISSED [27]    ......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT