Wongstedt v Wongstedt, 2017 SKCA 100
Judge | Caldwell, Herauf and Whitmore JJ.A |
Court | Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan) |
Case Date | November 16, 2017 |
Jurisdiction | Saskatchewan |
Citations | 2017 SKCA 100 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
41 practice notes
-
Table of Cases
...194 Wongstedt v Wongstedt, 2017 SKCA 100.................................................................................................................587 Wood v Boere, 2012 BCSC 252.................................................................................................................
-
Table of cases
...Wongstedt v Wongstedt, 2017 SKCA 100 ................................................................................................................557 Wood v Boere, 2012 BCSC 252 ....................................................................................................................
-
Evidence; Procedure; Costs
...upon by the 42 43 44 45 46 47 O v C, [2004] NJ No 19 (SC) (interim spousal support). 1995 CanLII 5715 (SKQB). Wongstedt v Wongstedt, 2017 SKCA 100 at para 34, Caldwell SG v KB, 2021 SKCA 133 at para 22. Kaatz v Kaatz, [2001] SJ No 661 (QB); compare Mercier v Mercier, [2005] AJ No 494 (CA). ......
-
Evidence; procedure; costs
...Sch D (Judicature Act). 41 O v C, [2004] NJ No 19 (SC) (interim spousal support). 42 1995 CanLII 5715 (SKQB). 43 Wongstedt v Wongstedt, 2017 SKCA 100 at para 34, Caldwell JA. 44 Kaatz v Kaatz, [2001] SJ No 661 (QB); compare Mercier v Mercier, [2005] AJ No 494 (CA). See also Hunchak v Anton,......
Request a trial to view additional results
31 cases
-
TYACKE v TYACKE, 2019 SKQB 271
...[125] Whether interim or final, the starting point for the determination of spousal support is entitlement: Wongstedt v Wongstedt, 2017 SKCA 100, 3 RFL (8th) 43. Only once the applicant spouse satisfies the court that he or she is lawfully entitled to support does the court engage in an ass......
-
Carruthers v Carruthers,
...in nature, and as such they attract a deferential standard of review in this Court. As stated by this Court in Wongstedt v Wongstedt, 2017 SKCA 100, 3 RFL (8th) [41] …It is rare for an appellate court to interfere with a costs award due to the inherently discretionary nature of those awards......
-
PATEL v. SASKATCHEWAN HEALTH AUTHORITY (formerly the Regina Qu’Appelle Regional Health Authority), 2020 SKQB 194
...and that which is not. The reasons for this proposition, and the associated procedure, are succinctly described in Wongstedt v Wongstedt, 2017 SKCA 100, [2018] 4 WWR 82 [38] … Where objections are taken to affidavit evidence, the judge who hears them should briefly articulate which portions......
-
Peterson v Peterson, 2019 SKCA 76
...only if it is shown that the order was made arbitrarily or without regard to the applicable principles. In Wongstedt v Wongstedt, 2017 SKCA 100, [2018] 4 WWR 82, Caldwell J.A. said, “the appellate court looks to see whether the judge misapplied some governing principle or rule or disregarde......
Request a trial to view additional results
9 books & journal articles
-
Table of Cases
...194 Wongstedt v Wongstedt, 2017 SKCA 100.................................................................................................................587 Wood v Boere, 2012 BCSC 252.................................................................................................................
-
Table of cases
...Wongstedt v Wongstedt, 2017 SKCA 100 ................................................................................................................557 Wood v Boere, 2012 BCSC 252 ....................................................................................................................
-
Evidence; Procedure; Costs
...upon by the 42 43 44 45 46 47 O v C, [2004] NJ No 19 (SC) (interim spousal support). 1995 CanLII 5715 (SKQB). Wongstedt v Wongstedt, 2017 SKCA 100 at para 34, Caldwell SG v KB, 2021 SKCA 133 at para 22. Kaatz v Kaatz, [2001] SJ No 661 (QB); compare Mercier v Mercier, [2005] AJ No 494 (CA). ......
-
Evidence; procedure; costs
...Sch D (Judicature Act). 41 O v C, [2004] NJ No 19 (SC) (interim spousal support). 42 1995 CanLII 5715 (SKQB). 43 Wongstedt v Wongstedt, 2017 SKCA 100 at para 34, Caldwell JA. 44 Kaatz v Kaatz, [2001] SJ No 661 (QB); compare Mercier v Mercier, [2005] AJ No 494 (CA). See also Hunchak v Anton,......
Request a trial to view additional results